Mr Hammer wrote on Oct 14^th, 2016 at 12:52pm:


Bill Shorten is 49 years old.

I doubt that Trump would be interested in raping him.

Im not on the jury but my guess is that there will be be found no substance behind these allegations, just like the majority of allegations of sexual abuse.

Maybe Trump will flee America like Roman Polanski after he did the same thing ...

Secret Wars wrote on Oct 14^th, 2016 at 1:38pm:


Really - who was that?

Fuzzball wrote on Oct 14^th, 2016 at 1:27pm:


This is a thread about Donald Trump being accused of raping at least one child.

You seem to be attempting to divert attention away from that fact.

I wonder why that is.

"A federal judge in New York has ordered counsel for Donald Trump and the disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein to appear in court along with the attorney for a woman referred to only as “Jane Doe” who alleges the Republican presidential nominee raped her when she was 13."

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14^th, 2016 at 1:53pm:


'It seems', you're the one with an obsession in child sexual abuse haemorrhoid, you've posted on the subject regularly, and well before Donald Trump threw his hat in the ring for the Whitehouse, in fact a couple of years before..........

What are you trying to hide haemorrhoid?

Fuzzball wrote on Oct 14^th, 2016 at 1:58pm:


Once again, you try to divert attention away from the fact that Donald Trump has been accused of raping at least one child.

Why is that?

I'm curious.

"At one party, Trump is accused of tying one of the young girls to the bed before raping her while the victim repeatedly plead with him to stop."

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14^th, 2016 at 1:58pm:


Of course you endorsed him ...

Secret Wars wrote on Oct 14^th, 2016 at 2:06pm:


No.

I just told you that I didn't.

Please do some research, and learn a little about how our political system works.

Lawsuit alleging Donald Trump forcibly raped girl, 13, gets pre-trial date

Secret Wars wrote on Oct 14^th, 2016 at 2:17pm:


Incorrect.

A federal judge in New York has ordered counsel for Donald Trump and the disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein to appear in court along with the attorney for a woman

A Guardian investigation this summer found that the lawsuit appeared to have been coordinated by a former producer on the Jerry Springer TV show who has been associated in the past with a range of disputed claims involving celebrities including OJ Simpson and Kurt Cobain. A publicist acting for “Jane Doe” also attempted to sell a video in which the woman describes her allegations against Trump to media outlets at a $1m price tag.

The court order gives no details of the legal complaint raised by “Jane Doe”. It instructs all parties to the case to set out in advance the nature of the allegations and the “principal defenses”, as well as any previous motions and discovery as well as the “estimated length of trial”.

Karnal wrote on Oct 14^th, 2016 at 3:27pm:


Yep, I saw that.

" ... presiding judge, Ronnie Abrams, scheduled a conference hearing between both legal teams for December 16.

"The meet is intended to decipher whether this legal complaint goes to trial or can be settled out of court."

Pretrial conference

The Guardian investigation found that a publicist calling himself “Al Taylor” attempted to sell the videotape of “Jane Doe” relating her allegations for $1m. It linked Taylor through a variety of means including shared email addresses and phone numbers to Norm Lubow, who used to work on Springer’s daytime talk show.

Lubow was connected to a contentious claim, raised in the 1998 documentary movie Kurt and Courtney, that Courtney Love offered a fellow musician $50,000 to murder her husband, Kurt Cobain of Nirvana. Love denied the charge.

According to the New York Post, Lubow was also behind a tabloid newspaper story that OJ Simpson bought illicit drugs on the day his estranged wife Nicole Brown was killed.

When the Guardian quizzed “Al Taylor” about his true identity, the publicist replied: “Just be warned, we’ll sue you if we don’t like what you write. We’ll sue your ass, own your ass and own your newspaper’s ass as well, punk.”

The Trump presidential campaign did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the forthcoming court proceedings. A lawyer for the Trump Organization told the Guardian in July: “This is basically a sham lawsuit brought by someone who desires to impact the presidential election.”

lee wrote on Oct 14^th, 2016 at 3:16pm:


A pretrial conference.

Karnal wrote on Oct 14^th, 2016 at 5:57pm:



Saw today on the news that Trumps lawyers asked one of the networks to stop showing these 'false' (his words, not mine) allegations designed to tarnish his name or they'll be sued. The network wrote back to them and refused.

I don't think the network would take such a stand if they thought the claims were 'trumped' up.

"We did what the law allows," an attorney for the Times wrote. "We published newsworthy information about a subject of deep public concern. If Mr. Trump disagrees, if he believes that American citizens had no right to hear what these women had to say and that the law of this country forces us and those who would criticize him to stand silent or be punished, we welcome the opportunity to have a court set him straight."

Karnal wrote on Oct 14^th, 2016 at 5:57pm:



Saw today on the news that Trumps lawyers asked one of the networks to stop showing these 'false' (his words, not mine) allegations designed to tarnish his name or they'll be sued. The network wrote back to them and refused.

I don't think the network would take such a stand if they thought the claims were 'trumped' up.

http://ih1.redbubble.net/image.229667891.4741/raf,750x1000,075,t,f89f2b:1617e563...

lee wrote on Oct 15^th, 2016 at 9:51pm:


Accused or sexually assaulting at least 8 women, and raping at least one child, and you support him no matter what.

That's a decision you'll have to live with.

The day he goes to prison, or dies, I'll be throwing the biggest party you've ever seen.

lee wrote on Oct 15^th, 2016 at 10:05pm:


The day he is convicted, and goes to gaol, I'll be celebrating.

You, however, will still be making excuses for him.

Some people are apologists for rapists, some people are not.

You, however, will still be making excuses for him.

Some people are apologists for rapists, some people are not.

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 16^th, 2016 at 1:40am:


Some people, like you, have such a sad F***ing life that they stay up to 1.40am on this forum repeating themselves over and over again with the same schit.

You sad little thing haemorrhoid.......

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 18^th, 2016 at 7:46am:


Wow, A lawyer directing a judge.