Australian Politics Forum - Pre-emptive damage limitation

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register

Forum rules, Recent posts (with text), RSS, Search options, Browse all uploaded images
Home, Articles, Green Tax Shift, Evolution,

Australian Politics Forum › General Discussion › America › Pre-emptive damage limitation

‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›

Pages: 1

Pre-emptive damage limitation (Read 448 times)

bogarde73

Gold Member

Offline

Anti-Global & Contra Mundum

Posts: 18443
Gender: male

Pre-emptive damage limitation
Oct 24^th, 2016 at 9:36am

By Tom Howell Jr. - The Washington Times - Updated: 7:17 p.m. on Sunday, October 23, 2016

Voter fraud has occurred in recent presidential elections, officials in key swing states say, yet its magnitude falls short of the type of systematic cheating that Donald Trump is prophesying.
Ohio’s secretary of state discovered dozens of people who appeared to vote in two states or cast ballots as noncitizens in 2012. Pennsylvania recorded 28 fraud cases from 2000 to 2016, resulting in 17 convictions on charges such as voter impersonation and fraudulent use of absentee ballots.

In Wisconsin, officials said attempts to impersonate other voters are rare, though ex-felons sometimes manage to vote before their rights have been restored. Reid Magney, a spokesman at the Wisconsin Elections Commission, said the agency may get a couple of dozen of such cases out of 3 million votes cast.

Analysts said those kinds of irregularities, while serious, wouldn’t have swung the election in any of those states, each of which Barack Obama won by tens or hundreds of thousands of votes in both of his presidential races.

“I’m not aware of any widespread fraud in any of the key states in 2008 and 2012. Surely there was no fraud that actually made a difference to the outcome,” said Joshua A. Douglas, a law professor at the University of Kentucky who teaches and researches election law.

Questions about whether rigging or fraud could sway an election made news after Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump raised fears about it.

Know the enemies of a civil society by their public behaviour, by their fraudulent claim to be liberal-progressive, by their propensity to lie and, above all, by their attachment to authoritarianism.

IP Logged

bogarde73 Gold Member Offline Anti-Global & Contra Mundum Posts: 18443 Gender:	Re: Pre-emptive damage limitation Reply #1 - Oct 24^th, 2016 at 9:37am Rig the polls, rig the vote. No problem, what result do you want?
Back to top	Know the enemies of a civil society by their public behaviour, by their fraudulent claim to be liberal-progressive, by their propensity to lie and, above all, by their attachment to authoritarianism. IP Logged

Marla Gold Member Offline Weed is my Jesus Posts: 13723 Colorado Gender:	Re: Pre-emptive damage limitation Reply #2 - Oct 24^th, 2016 at 9:49am Please shut up. You're beyond tedious with this spam.
Back to top	I know progress has no patience but something's got to give IP Logged

Karnal Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 96413	Re: Pre-emptive damage limitation Reply #3 - Oct 24^th, 2016 at 10:34am bogarde73 wrote on Oct 24^th, 2016 at 9:37am: Rig the polls, rig the vote. No problem, what result do you want? That depends, Bogie. Have you read your article? Try reading the bit you highlighted.
Back to top	IP Logged

polite_gandalf Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 20027 Canberra Gender:	Re: Pre-emptive damage limitation Reply #4 - Oct 24^th, 2016 at 11:42am Karnal wrote on Oct 24^th, 2016 at 10:34am: bogarde73 wrote on Oct 24^th, 2016 at 9:37am: Rig the polls, rig the vote. No problem, what result do you want? That depends, Bogie. Have you read your article? Try reading the bit you highlighted. LOL I was about to say... Maybe boges misread it?
Back to top	A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said: Quote: Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms. IP Logged