Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 ... 10
Send Topic Print
If freedom of speech means anything, it means... (Read 20905 times)
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: If freedom of speech means anything, it means...
Reply #30 - Dec 8th, 2016 at 8:51am
 
freediver wrote on Dec 7th, 2016 at 10:01pm:
polite_gandalf wrote on Dec 7th, 2016 at 11:57am:
Yadda wrote on Dec 7th, 2016 at 9:31am:
Main Street, Australia, is too politically correct, imo,        and i believe that our police 'service' would NOT allow anyone to freely be critical of ISLAM,       .....and to freely make such statements, in any central public space, within an Australian city.


You are perfectly free to be critical of Islam Yadda, as shock jocks, right wing politicians and neo-nazis demonstrate on a daily basis. What you are not free to do is to intimidate or incite violence. Unfortunately for you the line has been blurred because like minded people have so often coupled verbal assaults with physical assaults. Thus intimidatory verbal assaults on women wearing hijabs by men shouldn't be tolerated if the victim reasonably feels she is in danger of physical assault - as she so often is (ripping of hijab, spitting). But no muslim should (and I don't believe can), be able to gag anyone merely for being "offensive" - without being intimidatory or incitatory. The only intellectual debate Australians (and much of the west) are specifically banned from is advocating holocaust denial.


What if it offends or insults someone?


I think we can all agree that 18c of the RDA is clumsily worded, as clearly the intent of the law is to protect against racial vilification - and in reality that is the only thing that is ever pursued in regards to this subsection. Someone may "offend" you with his arguments about an ethnicity of which you are a member of - but it may not have been done with the intent to vilify. And the key point is that this sort of "offense" and even "insult" is protected by the provisions in 18d. Thus why Bill Leak has never been gagged via 18c - even though he demonstrably has offended a lot of Aboriginal people.
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 42329
Re: If freedom of speech means anything, it means...
Reply #31 - Dec 8th, 2016 at 5:31pm
 
Belgarion wrote on Dec 8th, 2016 at 8:38am:
Brian Ross wrote on Dec 7th, 2016 at 9:41pm:
Belgarion wrote on Dec 7th, 2016 at 8:23pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Dec 7th, 2016 at 4:57pm:
Belgarion wrote on Dec 7th, 2016 at 3:21pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Dec 7th, 2016 at 2:14pm:
Belgarion wrote on Dec 7th, 2016 at 9:10am:
I agree with the OP. Freedom of speech means exactly that. There is no human right not to be offended. Any opinion can be expressed and any opinion can be challenged.


Except according to the laws of Libel, Slander and criminality, right, Belgarion?   Roll Eyes


Yes  Brian, but you know these laws relate to actual damage to an individuals reputation, they are not intended to be used to silence opinion.  Roll Eyes


Ah, but if you knew anything about Criminal Libel cases, the truth is immaterial to the outcome, Belgarion.   The damage to their reputation is what matters, no matter if it is the truth or not.    Roll Eyes


The truth is a legitimate defence in such cases, as is the concept of honest opinion.   Making a statement known to be untrue, or recklessly making a statement without checking its truthfulness is what the libel laws jump on. Roll Eyes



The "truth" is immaterial in such cases, Belgarion.   Roll Eyes


From the Defamation Act 2005 Brian.....

    "The publication of any false imputation concerning a person, or a member of his family, whether living or dead, by which (a) the reputation of that person is likely to be injured or (b) he is likely to be injured in his profession or trade or (c) other persons are likely to be induced to shun, avoid, ridicule or despise him."..........


"25 Defence of justification
It is a defence to the publication of defamatory matter if the defendant proves that the defamatory imputations carried by the matter of which the plaintiff complains are substantially true."

Not even 100%, true, just substantially true.....


You are assuming that Criminal Defamation is only covered by Section 18c of the Racial Discrimination Act, Belgarion.

In reality, it is covered by other acts which predate that act, such as in NSW Crimes Act 1900, as well as the uniform Defamation Act 2005.   Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49389
At my desk.
Re: If freedom of speech means anything, it means...
Reply #32 - Dec 8th, 2016 at 6:44pm
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Dec 8th, 2016 at 8:51am:
freediver wrote on Dec 7th, 2016 at 10:01pm:
polite_gandalf wrote on Dec 7th, 2016 at 11:57am:
Yadda wrote on Dec 7th, 2016 at 9:31am:
Main Street, Australia, is too politically correct, imo,        and i believe that our police 'service' would NOT allow anyone to freely be critical of ISLAM,       .....and to freely make such statements, in any central public space, within an Australian city.


You are perfectly free to be critical of Islam Yadda, as shock jocks, right wing politicians and neo-nazis demonstrate on a daily basis. What you are not free to do is to intimidate or incite violence. Unfortunately for you the line has been blurred because like minded people have so often coupled verbal assaults with physical assaults. Thus intimidatory verbal assaults on women wearing hijabs by men shouldn't be tolerated if the victim reasonably feels she is in danger of physical assault - as she so often is (ripping of hijab, spitting). But no muslim should (and I don't believe can), be able to gag anyone merely for being "offensive" - without being intimidatory or incitatory. The only intellectual debate Australians (and much of the west) are specifically banned from is advocating holocaust denial.


What if it offends or insults someone?


I think we can all agree that 18c of the RDA is clumsily worded, as clearly the intent of the law is to protect against racial vilification - and in reality that is the only thing that is ever pursued in regards to this subsection. Someone may "offend" you with his arguments about an ethnicity of which you are a member of - but it may not have been done with the intent to vilify. And the key point is that this sort of "offense" and even "insult" is protected by the provisions in 18d. Thus why Bill Leak has never been gagged via 18c - even though he demonstrably has offended a lot of Aboriginal people.


So how is it that Toben was not protected by 18d, cii? Did they put him in jail for being unfair, or for not believing what he said?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: If freedom of speech means anything, it means...
Reply #33 - Dec 8th, 2016 at 7:01pm
 
Evidently holocaust denial is a special category. According to Brandis, its straight away deemed to be racial vilification - no ifs or buts apparently.
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
Belgarion
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 5459
Gender: male
Re: If freedom of speech means anything, it means...
Reply #34 - Dec 8th, 2016 at 7:14pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on Dec 8th, 2016 at 5:31pm:
You are assuming that Criminal Defamation is only covered by Section 18c of the Racial Discrimination Act, Belgarion.

In reality, it is covered by other acts which predate that act, such as in NSW Crimes Act 1900, as well as the uniform Defamation Act 2005.   Roll Eyes


"DEFAMATION ACT 2005 - LONG TITLE

An Act to enact in New South Wales provisions to promote uniform laws of defamation in Australia; to repeal the Defamation Act 1974 ; to amend the Crimes Act 1900 in relation to criminal defamation;

The new act trumps everything else Brian....  Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

"I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."

Voltaire.....(possibly)
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 96446
Re: If freedom of speech means anything, it means...
Reply #35 - Dec 8th, 2016 at 9:09pm
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Dec 8th, 2016 at 7:01pm:
Evidently holocaust denial is a special category. According to Brandis, its straight away deemed to be racial vilification - no ifs or buts apparently.


Do you think Brandis may be driven by political motives?

I'd ask FD, but he won't say.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: If freedom of speech means anything, it means...
Reply #36 - Dec 9th, 2016 at 6:45am
 
Karnal wrote on Dec 8th, 2016 at 9:09pm:
polite_gandalf wrote on Dec 8th, 2016 at 7:01pm:
Evidently holocaust denial is a special category. According to Brandis, its straight away deemed to be racial vilification - no ifs or buts apparently.


Do you think Brandis may be driven by political motives?

I'd ask FD, but he won't say.


I think the entire 'holocaust-denial industry' is driven by political motives, and thats the whole issue here. Make a public speech in Australia arguing that the Armenian genocide never happened - and watch what happens - nothing. Do the same for the holocaust and there will be political forces coming down on you like a tonne of bricks - with the RDA in hand. There are powerful and well funded pro-Israel lobbies constantly pushing this agenda, and both major parties are deeply in bed with them. Like I said, its become a special category - and its precisely because of political motives.
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
Belgarion
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 5459
Gender: male
Re: If freedom of speech means anything, it means...
Reply #37 - Dec 9th, 2016 at 7:34am
 
Do the people who would make holocaust denial a crime not see that they are playing directly into the deniers hands?  Instead of having these claims out in the open where they can be criticised, the deniers can then say 'The government is trying to shut me up, therefore I must be onto something!' and then someone will begin to listen...

This applies to every attempt to censor free speech. Far better to have everything out in the open where it can be examined than driven underground to attract a credulous audience.
Back to top
 

"I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."

Voltaire.....(possibly)
 
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: If freedom of speech means anything, it means...
Reply #38 - Dec 9th, 2016 at 8:23am
 
Belgarion wrote on Dec 9th, 2016 at 7:34am:
Do the people who would make holocaust denial a crime not see that they are playing directly into the deniers hands?  Instead of having these claims out in the open where they can be criticised, the deniers can then say 'The government is trying to shut me up, therefore I must be onto something!' and then someone will begin to listen...

This applies to every attempt to censor free speech. Far better to have everything out in the open where it can be examined than driven underground to attract a credulous audience.


I used to wonder this too Belgarion, but lets face it - holocaust denial hasn't become any more credible in society because of these gags. The Frederic Toben's and David Irvings haven't become martyrs of free speech despite both being gaoled for what they have said and written. And lets not be naive and ignore the incredibly effective propaganda machine behind the holocaust industry. The fact that Brandis can boldly come out and say straight up that holocaust denial is automatically equivalent to racial vilification - without even raising eyebrows says it all really. We've all bought into it, we've become conditioned to think that gagging holocaust denial is an acceptable course of action - despite otherwise passionately defending free speech. And its even worse in Europe - understandably so since thats where it all happened. I never could get over the sheer brazen absurdity of French politicians walking hand in hand down the street in solidarity with Charlie Hebdo and the attack on their freedom - while at the very same time a French anti-semite was getting his door kicked down by police over some nasty words he said about jews on facebook. I kid you not, this really happened, look it up.
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 21885
A cat with a view
Re: If freedom of speech means anything, it means...
Reply #39 - Dec 9th, 2016 at 8:38am
 
Belgarion wrote on Dec 9th, 2016 at 7:34am:

Do the people who would make holocaust denial a crime             not see that they are playing directly into the deniers hands?

Instead of having these claims out in the open where they can be criticised, the deniers can then say 'The government is trying to shut me up, therefore I must be onto something!' and then someone will begin to listen...

This applies to every attempt to censor free speech.

Far better to have everything out in the open where it can be examined                than driven underground to attract a credulous audience.




Belgarion,

Exactly.

Well said.


Back to top
 

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: If freedom of speech means anything, it means...
Reply #40 - Dec 9th, 2016 at 8:48am
 
A disclaimer to what I just wrote about how gagging "works" in terms of not making Toben and Irving martyrs. Where that doesn't apply is outside the west, particular in the muslim world where holocaust denial is high to the point (in some places) of being socially acceptable. But this is merely an extension of the cultural-political war between the muslim world and the western world - centering on the legitimacy of Israel. Where the 'holocaust industry' and all the associated propaganda and intellectual intolerance that goes with it merely reinforces their perception of the hypocricy and sinister motives of the west in oppressing the muslim world.

And so one could say that its the muslim world that represents your "underground" where western belligerance against holocaust denial has created that "credulous audience".
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 21885
A cat with a view
Re: If freedom of speech means anything, it means...
Reply #41 - Dec 9th, 2016 at 9:30am
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Dec 9th, 2016 at 8:48am:
A disclaimer to what I just wrote about how gagging "works" in terms of not making Toben and Irving martyrs. Where that doesn't apply is outside the west, particular in the muslim world where holocaust denial is high to the point (in some places) of being socially acceptable. But this is merely an extension of the cultural-political war between the muslim world and the western world - centering on the legitimacy of Israel. Where the 'holocaust industry' and all the associated propaganda and intellectual intolerance that goes with it merely reinforces their perception of the hypocricy and sinister motives of the west in oppressing the muslim world.

And so one could say that its the muslim world that represents your "underground" where western belligerance against holocaust denial has created that "credulous audience".



gandalf,

You would seem to be suggesting,               that if only there was no state of Israel, there would be no need found among moslems, for enmity and hatred, towards persons who are not moslems [because of the Wests support of the Jewish state] ?

But gandalf, isn't it true, that the moslem hatred for Jews [and other persons who are not moslems] is secure and well founded within the legitimate doctrines ISLAM ?

i.e.
gandalf, isn't it true that;

EVEN IF THE STATE ISRAEL DID NOT EXIST,         .......that there still exists within the legitimate doctrines ISLAM,           a complete religious justification for moslem hatred,          for Jews [and for all other persons who are not moslems] ?




"Strongest among men in enmity to the believers              wilt thou find the Jews and Pagans; and nearest among them in love to the believers wilt thou find those who say, "We are Christians": because amongst these are men devoted to learning and men who have renounced the world, and they are not arrogant."
Koran 5.82


"There is for you an excellent example (to follow) in Abraham and those with him, when they said to their people: "We are clear of you and of whatever ye worship besides Allah: we have rejected you, and there has arisen, between us and you, enmity and hatred for ever,- unless ye believe in Allah and Him alone"....."
Koran 60:4



Back to top
 

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
Postmodern Trendoid III
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 10266
Gender: male
Re: If freedom of speech means anything, it means...
Reply #42 - Dec 9th, 2016 at 12:21pm
 
Karnal wrote on Dec 8th, 2016 at 9:09pm:
polite_gandalf wrote on Dec 8th, 2016 at 7:01pm:
Evidently holocaust denial is a special category. According to Brandis, its straight away deemed to be racial vilification - no ifs or buts apparently.


Do you think Brandis may be driven by political motives?

I'd ask FD, but he won't say.


Abbott dropped the revision or repeal of 18c due to pressure from Jewish groups.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 96446
Re: If freedom of speech means anything, it means...
Reply #43 - Dec 9th, 2016 at 12:41pm
 
Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Dec 9th, 2016 at 12:21pm:
Karnal wrote on Dec 8th, 2016 at 9:09pm:
polite_gandalf wrote on Dec 8th, 2016 at 7:01pm:
Evidently holocaust denial is a special category. According to Brandis, its straight away deemed to be racial vilification - no ifs or buts apparently.


Do you think Brandis may be driven by political motives?

I'd ask FD, but he won't say.


Abbott dropped the revision or repeal of 18c due to pressure from Jewish groups.


Ah yes. We grew here they flew here, no?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49389
At my desk.
Re: If freedom of speech means anything, it means...
Reply #44 - Dec 9th, 2016 at 12:49pm
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Dec 9th, 2016 at 8:23am:
Belgarion wrote on Dec 9th, 2016 at 7:34am:
Do the people who would make holocaust denial a crime not see that they are playing directly into the deniers hands?  Instead of having these claims out in the open where they can be criticised, the deniers can then say 'The government is trying to shut me up, therefore I must be onto something!' and then someone will begin to listen...

This applies to every attempt to censor free speech. Far better to have everything out in the open where it can be examined than driven underground to attract a credulous audience.


I used to wonder this too Belgarion, but lets face it - holocaust denial hasn't become any more credible in society because of these gags. The Frederic Toben's and David Irvings haven't become martyrs of free speech despite both being gaoled for what they have said and written. And lets not be naive and ignore the incredibly effective propaganda machine behind the holocaust industry. The fact that Brandis can boldly come out and say straight up that holocaust denial is automatically equivalent to racial vilification - without even raising eyebrows says it all really. We've all bought into it, we've become conditioned to think that gagging holocaust denial is an acceptable course of action - despite otherwise passionately defending free speech. And its even worse in Europe - understandably so since thats where it all happened. I never could get over the sheer brazen absurdity of French politicians walking hand in hand down the street in solidarity with Charlie Hebdo and the attack on their freedom - while at the very same time a French anti-semite was getting his door kicked down by police over some nasty words he said about jews on facebook. I kid you not, this really happened, look it up.


We wouldn't know who Toben was if not for the fact he was jailed for denying the holocaust. It took them about ten years to do it, and he milked it for free publicity the whole way. It doesn't resonate with most Australians because of the message itself (and we are not compelled by our religion to think up reasons to continue slaughtering Jews, just like Muhammed did). 18c has helped Toben overcome the difficulties of getting holocaust denial back into the public debate.

I also think the Islamic victimhood industry is just as much to blame for the current state of affairs. A classic example of this is Gandalf's insistence that all Islamophobia is based on racism.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 ... 10
Send Topic Print