The 'Climate Change' hoax has become a cult that involves the movement of billions of dollars around the world. It's something like the international charity rackets that make certain leading individuals very rich indeed.

Pho? Relax. The Mekong isn't about to evaporate because of 'Climate Change', and those fish farms for the export trade to Australia and elsewhere will still be swimming in human sh!t from a 1000 miles of upstream toilet-dumping by a couple of million people.

Pho Huc wrote on Dec 25^th, 2016 at 7:45pm:


What do you mean by 'impartial'?

The 'Climate Change' hoax is all about university funding grants, moral posturing, political agendas, social engineering, and lots of money being 'gifted' to the Third World from the pockets of the much-abused Western taxpayers.

There's nothing 'impartial' about it.

Our own top politicians think nothing of spending $64,000,000 of taxpayers' money on a non-binding plebiscite to ask the punters what they think about buggery being sanctified by marriage vows.

I mean, fair bloody dinkum, cobber.

And you're telling us we can trust our politicians with what they tell us on any particular subject, and we should respect them for how they are using our money?

Lord Herbert wrote on Dec 25^th, 2016 at 7:59pm:


Sweetie??  it is the scientists advising us all of this,, not the pollies. Depending on their views they'll say anything, but opinion isn't fact. I don't listen to what the pollies are saying, because their agenda is all about gaining and retaining personal power, unfortunately.  I mean, I'd like to think there are some who are honest, but its like being a cop. Once you join you have to think like a cop, or you get charged with criminal offenses for telling the truth.

Scientists on the other hand, have a different agenda. AND.. if they are to be given any credence by their peers, they have certain RULES, which dictate how seriously  their findings will be taken, by their peers.  Pollies, in the main, have shown themselves to be like ferals, they'll do whatever it takes for power.

Please don't confuse government bullshit for scientific theory.

Emma wrote on Dec 25^th, 2016 at 10:53pm:


You got proof it hasen't?

Rider wrote on Dec 26^th, 2016 at 9:32am:


Have you seen the latest temps in Siberia?   More record lows.....

But I'd reckon that would just be local weather wouldnt it?  Not the calamitous world exploding (in a billion years time) kind of bleating piffle we see from the swampies.

Jovial Monk wrote on Dec 26^th, 2016 at 4:32pm:


Isn't it marvellous what weather can do?

Emma wrote on Dec 26^th, 2016 at 10:06pm:



You do understand it is not a recent phenomenon? First  described in 1853.