Frank wrote on Jan 2^nd, 2017 at 9:02pm:


But, old boy, we love the Danes. We don't feel a burden to civilise you whatsoever. No BO, no curry stains.

Carry on, dear boy.

Frank wrote on Jan 2^nd, 2017 at 9:38pm:


Do you know any Danes?

Gordon wrote on Jan 2^nd, 2017 at 10:53pm:


Correlation not causation, is it?

Karnal wrote on Jan 2^nd, 2017 at 11:01pm:


I think it's the excessive cumin they eat seeping out of their skin. Yuk.  Hey, have you noticed how lots of them use a gas bottle and burner in their kitchen?  On the house keeping scale they're about equal to mainland chonks.

moses wrote on Jan 2^nd, 2017 at 3:31pm:


Correct moses. The only thing that makes men better than others in the eyes of God is their level of belief in God. Not race, not tribal, skin colour etc...

As I said, Islam is against racism.

On [superintendent Valeria] Silva’s watch, the city’s high schools have become menacing places where gangs of out-of-control teens prowl the halls, and “classroom invasions” by students settling private disputes are commonplace. Today, fights that “might have been between two individuals” can grow into “mêlées involving up to 40 or 50 people,” according to Steve Linders, a St Paul police spokesman. Roving packs often attack individuals, and police have had to use chemical irritants to break up what they call “riots.” […] One high school has issued emergency whistles to teachers and assigned a guard to every floor. A teacher who was crushed into a shelf in a classroom invasion now instructs her students to use a “secret knock” to enter her classroom.

The discipline policies that gave rise to this chaos sprang from Silva’s embrace of “racial equity” ideology. In St Paul, as across the nation, black students as a group are referred for discipline at higher rates than their peers. Silva made eliminating this racial gap a top priority. In Silva’s view, the gap is caused by teachers’ racial bias and cultural insensitivity, not by higher rates of misconduct by black students. She mandated “white privilege” training for all district personnel, eliminated “continual wilful disobedience” as a suspendable offence, and shifted many special education students with behaviour problems — students who are disproportionately black — to mainstream classrooms.

As Silva’s new discipline regime took hold, reading and math scores dropped and headlines about assaults on teachers appeared with disturbing frequency. Yet instead of reconsidering, her administration moved quickly to control public relations damage. For example, district officials attempted to silence critics by accusing them of having “issues with racial equity,” one veteran teacher told City Pages. In December 2015, teachers threatened to strike over mounting safety concerns… Meanwhile, St Paul families of all races began flooding into charter and suburban public schools, taking millions of dollars in state aid with them.
http://thefederalist.com/2016/07/29/federal-racial-discipline-quotas-create-chao...

freediver wrote on Jan 2^nd, 2017 at 3:24pm:


No FD, I have never once said that mocking people for their chosen religion is racist - In fact I have argued the exact opposite. See if you can understand the difference between these two statements:  1. all muslims are stupid because they are retarded due to inbreeding; 2. all muslims are stupid because Islamic text is nonsensical and absurd. Both are crude and ignorant, but only one of those statements is racist - can you guess which one?

Quote:


no, you're not listening to what I have already explained. Prejudice and hate on the basis of fabricated categorisations -  such as "all blacks" is the epitome of racism - precisely because the categorisation is arbitrary and wholly unscientific. The commonality in all forms of racism is what they call 'outgroup homogeneity' - prejudice against members of a "group" that are perceived to be all the same. In this case, all the many different cultures and ethnicities who happen to have black skin are reduced to the one type. In moses' case, reducing all muslims to a monolithic group of inbred, psychopathic retards. Thats not to say it isn't based on an element of truth - a minority of muslims are inbred, and rates are higher than anywhere else.


Quote:


Oh FD, I would just *LOVE* to hear you come up with an example of "prejudice against muslims" that *IS* racist in your view. Would you care to have a shot? For someone who insists that reducing 100% of the male muslim population to a mindless, psychopathic, retarded collective isn't racist, it would be fascinating to see what you come up with.

Quote:


It is. I've never worked out your obsession with this. Is it because you are confusing rational and irrational fear of Islam? Hint: Islamophobia can only be irrational fear.

freediver wrote on Jan 2^nd, 2017 at 3:34pm:


Best try and comprehend what I actually wrote FD, before you confuse yourself more.

Also Islam promotes no such thing: judgement is for God and God alone.

polite_gandalf wrote on Jan 2^nd, 2017 at 2:47pm:


If you call being lumped into the one category by someone in an ill-thought out rant on an internet forum being a "victim", then sure - but its not my definition of victimhood. Also I don't give moses credit for properly thinking through what he said. I think its safe to assume he wasn't thinking about non-arab, western converts when he uttered his drivel - would you agree?

Suffice to say, I won't be victimised in any meaningful way by racists - like muslim women getting their hijab ripped off, or an elderly couple getting beaten up by thugs because of something that happened on another continent. Calling me a "victim" of moses' racism rather cheapens actual victims who actually suffer from racism wouldn't you say?

polite_gandalf wrote on Jan 2^nd, 2017 at 12:44pm:


It is not a tiny minority - it is universal in the actual relevant field of social sciences. Try doing a bit of reading and educate yourself. In the article I posted in my other thread about racism, we see that a majority of anthropologists don't believe in 'race'

Quote:


Ah I see - so "race" really means "ethnicity"? So tell me FD, do you think you can be racist against ethnicities? Where does "race" even fit in then? What is the point of the word?

As for your "idiotic copout", perhaps you should have actually read your article:

Quote:


Add to that cultural traditions, and membership of an arab nation - and you have the explanation of what it means to be 'Arab' - not genes, not skin colour, not any other biological markers. Arabs are not a "race", and therefore, by your own logic, cannot be the subjects of racism.