Quote:Muslims do pray 5 times (not 6) a day, and they do believe its the Islamic command to do so. That someone might consider these beliefs the beliefs of an idiot, does not make him a racist. Of course he may be a racist depending on what else he thinks about muslims - like believing that the reason that they are stupid is because they are all inbred.
You are still yet to explain how inbred is a race.
Quote:This would be denigrating an entire group based on an ignorant stereotype (that all muslims are inbred)
What about the stereotype that all Muslims are stupid? How is one racist and the other not?
Quote:whereas your example is denigrating an entire group based on something that is (for the purposes of this discussion) true - if you are a muslim then in theory you do pray 5 times a day, and believe its the Islamic command to do so.
So whether a statement is racist depends on whether there is an element of truth to it?
Quote:Logical fallacy. All racism is outgroup homogeneity, but not all outgroup homogeneity is racism.
How do you tell when it is? Is Moses' comment racist because it is incorrect regarding the extent of inbreeding, but not because of his claim that Muslims are stupid?
Quote:What makes it racist? That its homogenising an entire group in order to denigrate them. It is literally no different in this respect to labelling all muslims inbred retards.
Sand negro is a racial grouping or stereotype. Stupid is not. Inbred is not. Muslim is not.
Quote:Of course you need a 'rational' explanation to explain irrational behaviour. Its not a paradox FD. Researchers are coming up with explanations for racism all the time. What, do you think these explanations have to be "irrational"? Come now FD, use that brain of yours.
Are any of those researchers concluding that racism is the only rational explanation for Islamophobia?
This is actually starting to sound like a tautology to me. It is not a statement about Islamophobia. Rather it is a revelation of your attempt to discard the meaning of racism.
Quote:So what is the "racial aspect"?
The ethnicity, which just happens to coincide in this case with a lot of other cultural baggage such as language. I do not think Aussie was claiming that all the Israelis had to do to get his approval for the existence of Israel is to learn Arabic. A child born to Arabic parents will still be an Arab even if it is stolen, taken to the other side of the world, and raised with a different language and culture.
Quote:So races are a more specific form of ethnicities, or are they a subset of ethnicities?
Neither. Ethnicity is a broader term. Race refers only to inherited physical characteristics. Ethnicity incorporates culture etc. The language of the Arabs is part of their ethnicity, but is irrelevent to their race. That being said, ethnicity can be used to refer to race alone without causing confusion, except among those who seek it out.
Edit: I just googled it, and most results define ethnicity as excluding race - ie only the cultural aspect. So they are mutually exclusive terms, though I am pretty sure the terms get used interchangeably, perhaps because people think "ethnically chinese" is more politically correct than "racially chinese" when describing people.