Brian is that like when Nazis and Muslims invent anti-Jew conspiracies to promote their cause?

freediver wrote on Jan 4^th, 2017 at 4:41pm:


Clearly words don't have meaning FD, since 'sand negro' is not a race, yet its still racist. And there is no reason to assume the term is 'referring to a race' whenever someone uses it - any more than 'inbred retarded muslim' is. Basically you are saying that you can make up any  derogatory 'racey' sounding name, insist that it is referring to a race, and ta-da, its a racist term. And then you get to pick and choose which bigoted broad-brushing of an entire group is racist, and which is not - even though its all the same type of bigotry. Thus you can cunningly point out how moses' outrageously bigoted slur about 100% of muslim males is above anything else, most importantly, "not racist" - and de-facto not as bad as "blatant racism" - aka muslims and their apologists saying mean things about jews.

freediver wrote on Jan 4^th, 2017 at 4:41pm:


LOL nice try... but the racist part about inbred-retarded muslims is not 'muslim', its 'inbred-retarded'. Just like the racism in "all muslims are sand-negroes" is sand-negroes, not muslims. And lo and behold, a retarded inbred can only be a retarded inbred if their parents are also retarded inbred. You know, its a genetic thing, just like your sand-niggery affliction.

freediver wrote on Jan 4^th, 2017 at 4:41pm:


Well you failed. I literally said the exact opposite of what you 'paraphrased'. Read it again please.

freediver wrote on Jan 4^th, 2017 at 4:41pm:


I see. Would you describe it as "blatant racism"? Are you going to pursue Frank for months on end, start 20 threads in a row mocking him and pin him up in the hall of shame - aka the wiki?

Quote:


Thanks Gandalf. That pretty much sums up your argument.

Quote:


It only has any meaning at all if the meaning is shared Gandalf.

Quote:


People do it all the time Gandalf. Would you argue that sand negro is not racist because I just made it up?

Quote:


Different types Gandalf. I have provided a clear distinction, whereas yours is all over the place.

Quote:


No Gandalf. I point out that it is not racist. This is not cunning at all. It falls into the bleeding obvious category.

Quote:


Like I keep telling you, inbred is not a race. Retarded is not a race. Muslim is not a race. Stringing them together in ever more convoluted ways does not make it racist.

Quote:


This is neither true, nor is it anything that anyone here has claimed. It is your invention, in a desperate effort to racialise Moses's criticism of Islam.

Quote:


Or, you could explain what makes one version racist and the other not racist, as I have done for you. Boil it down please, without all the waffle and hyperbole.

freediver wrote on Jan 4^th, 2017 at 8:09pm:


This is a relief. The post-2007 FD is back.

I thought we were experiencing a transit of Venus or a return of Halley's Comet.

freediver wrote on Jan 4^th, 2017 at 8:34pm:


This is where you should be correcting me, FD.

If you made a mistake about my views, I'd certainly be correcting you.

If you were spot-on, I'd say ah.

Karnal wrote on Jan 4^th, 2017 at 8:55pm:



Enjoy the poo sandwich, Karnal, say miam-miam. You know you want to.

freediver wrote on Jan 4^th, 2017 at 8:09pm:


Good point FD - and neither is 'sand negro' a race. And stringing it together with 'muslim' does not make it racist. This is your logic by the way, not mine. No one except you is defining 'sand negro' as a race, you are just making it up as you go. Hence words clearly have no meaning - to you.