Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Poll Poll
Question: Is the statement is my signature racist?

yes    
  5 (55.6%)
no    
  3 (33.3%)
depends    
  1 (11.1%)
don't know    
  0 (0.0%)




Total votes: 9
« Created by: polite_gandalf on: Jan 29th, 2017 at 9:05am »

Pages: 1 ... 47 48 49 50 51 52
Send Topic Print
What is racism? (Read 92785 times)
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 96187
Gender: male
Re: What is racism?
Reply #720 - Feb 6th, 2017 at 7:28pm
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 6th, 2017 at 8:58am:
Frank wrote on Feb 5th, 2017 at 9:14pm:
polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 5th, 2017 at 5:49pm:
freediver wrote on Feb 5th, 2017 at 8:51am:
What is a "racial marker" Gandalf? Is it something a Muslim uses to turn a non-racist statement into a racist one?


Tell me FD, do you reckon muslims are the only people who would consider the statement in my signature racist? And do you think anyone who considers it racist is necessarily involved in some sinister conspiracy to deflect attention away from criticism of Islam?

freediver wrote on Feb 5th, 2017 at 8:51am:
If intelligence is a marker, does that mean it is racist to say that doctors are intelligent?


doctors are not an ethno-cultural group, as I've mentioned before. They are a profession.



The Comparison of Mean IQ in Muslim and Non-Muslim CountriesDonald I. Templer

Abstract
The present research found that the Muslim country mean IQ of 81 is half a standard deviation below the mean IQ of non-Muslim nations and is not related to strength of Muslim culture as defined by the percentage of Muslims in the country. The mean IQ of 84 in Arab countries is not associated with per capita income and is incompatible with the intellectual achievements of the golden age of the Muslim Empire. Possible explanations for this decline include hybridization with sub-Saharan Africans, dysgenic decrease in the more educated Muslims employing birth control as suggested by Meisenberg, the Muslim religion not fostering critical thinking, and the intellectual contributions being both exaggerated and made by non-Muslims.




Ahem.....  Islam tends to make you thick, in other words.


You are quoting a well-known racist who believes negroes are intellectually deficient because of their genes. If you read the whole article, you'll see that of these "possible explanations" he actually argues against the one you highlighted - noting that "the strength of muslim culture does not seem very relevant to the IQ differences" and concluding that "It is here suggested that genetic factors are more important than economic/religious/cultural variables" - in explaining the IQ differences in arabs and muslims.

No, for old fashioned racists like Templer, it comes down to genetics, and his explanation is a far less nuanced one - simply that muslims became dumber once they started interbreeding with the inferior negroes.

So no, Islam doesn't tend to make you thick - according to Templar, interbreeding with inferior negroids makes you thick.


Ah yes - FD's "plausible theory". FD said he was going to put this article in the Wiki.

What happened, FD?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 96187
Gender: male
Re: What is racism?
Reply #721 - Feb 6th, 2017 at 7:43pm
 
freediver wrote on Feb 6th, 2017 at 6:42pm:
Gandalf, would it be fair to say that you have still not come up with a coherent definition of racism and that your efforts to racialise criticism of Islam actually compel you to muddy the waters as much as possible?

Quote:
Tell me FD, do you reckon muslims are the only people who would consider the statement in my signature racist?


I expect there is a reason you only included half the sentence - the same reason why you put far more effort into "interpreting" what Moses says.

Quote:
And do you think anyone who considers it racist is necessarily involved in some sinister conspiracy to deflect attention away from criticism of Islam?


I think they are doing their best with half a sentence.

Quote:
doctors are not an ethno-cultural group, as I've mentioned before. They are a profession.


Neither are Muslims. Islam is a religion, remember. You can actually choose to become a Muslim far easier than you can choose to become a doctor. Remember, you are the one who insisted that "fake" racial grouping are equally legitimate for constructing racism. You have even conceded before that doctors could be such a grouping, when you were banging on about markers. Of course, you change your mind regularly, and you seem to have dropped the BS about markers completely.


No, FD, it is not fair to say that Moses' retarded inbred stance is some form of legitimate criticism of Islam, and nor is it reasonable.

It's completely delusional, as every schoolboy knows.

Yes, it may be easier to become a Muslim than a doctor, but it is not so easy to not become a Muslim, now is it? Trump has just tried to ban all religions from a handful of Muslim-majority nations. Your religion is not on your passport. Apart from your airport questions, you've been championing this policy for years, no?

But I'm curious. What do you think of Trump's Musel policy? Do you concur?

I've answered all your questions, FD. Do you think it would be fair to have a stab?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 47083
Gender: male
Re: What is racism?
Reply #722 - Feb 6th, 2017 at 8:19pm
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 6th, 2017 at 8:58am:
Frank wrote on Feb 5th, 2017 at 9:14pm:
polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 5th, 2017 at 5:49pm:
freediver wrote on Feb 5th, 2017 at 8:51am:
What is a "racial marker" Gandalf? Is it something a Muslim uses to turn a non-racist statement into a racist one?


Tell me FD, do you reckon muslims are the only people who would consider the statement in my signature racist? And do you think anyone who considers it racist is necessarily involved in some sinister conspiracy to deflect attention away from criticism of Islam?

freediver wrote on Feb 5th, 2017 at 8:51am:
If intelligence is a marker, does that mean it is racist to say that doctors are intelligent?


doctors are not an ethno-cultural group, as I've mentioned before. They are a profession.



The Comparison of Mean IQ in Muslim and Non-Muslim CountriesDonald I. Templer

Abstract
The present research found that the Muslim country mean IQ of 81 is half a standard deviation below the mean IQ of non-Muslim nations and is not related to strength of Muslim culture as defined by the percentage of Muslims in the country. The mean IQ of 84 in Arab countries is not associated with per capita income and is incompatible with the intellectual achievements of the golden age of the Muslim Empire. Possible explanations for this decline include hybridization with sub-Saharan Africans, dysgenic decrease in the more educated Muslims employing birth control as suggested by Meisenberg, the Muslim religion not fostering critical thinking, and the intellectual contributions being both exaggerated and made by non-Muslims.




Ahem.....  Islam tends to make you thick, in other words.


You are quoting a well-known racist who believes negroes are intellectually deficient because of their genes. If you read the whole article, you'll see that of these "possible explanations" he actually argues against the one you highlighted - noting that "the strength of muslim culture does not seem very relevant to the IQ differences" and concluding that "It is here suggested that genetic factors are more important than economic/religious/cultural variables" - in explaining the IQ differences in arabs and muslims.

No, for old fashioned racists like Templer, it comes down to genetics, and his explanation is a far less nuanced one - simply that muslims became dumber once they started interbreeding with the inferior negroes.

So no, Islam doesn't tend to make you thick - according to Templar, interbreeding with inferior negroids makes you thick.


Prof Steve Jones, one of Britain’s most eminent scientists, has warned that the level of inbreeding among the nation’s Muslims is endangering the health of future generations.
By Jonathan Wynne-Jones Religious Affairs Correspondent8:15AM BST 29 May 2011

The geneticist said that it was common in the Islamic world for men to marry their nieces and cousins.
He said that Bradford has a particular problem and warned that it could affect the health of children born into these marriages.
Prof Jones, who lectures at University College London, is likely to find himself at the centre of controversy in the wake of the comments.
Similar remarks made by Phil Woolas, a Labour environment minister, in 2008 resulted in calls for him to be sacked from the government.
Prof Jones, who writes for the Telegraph’s science pages, told an audience at the Hay Festival: “There may be some evidence that cousins marrying one another can be harmful.
“It is common in the Islamic world to marry your brother’s daughter, which is actually closer than marrying your cousin.
“We should be concerned about that as there can be a lot of hidden genetic damage. Children are much more likely to get two copies of a damaged gene.”
He added: “Bradford is very inbred. There is a huge amount of cousins marrying each other there.” Research in Bradford has found that babies born to Pakistani women are twice as likely to die in their first year as babies born to white mothers, with genetic problems linked to inbreeding identified as a “significant” cause.
Studies have found that within the city, more than 70 per cent of marriages are between relations, with more than half involving first cousins.
Separate studies have found that while British Pakistanis make up three per cent of all births, they account for one in three British children born with genetic illnesses. Prof Jones also said that incest was more common than is often realised in every part of society, adding that it had been particular prevalent among royalty and suggested it is still ­continuing.
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 96187
Gender: male
Re: What is racism?
Reply #723 - Feb 7th, 2017 at 1:10am
 
Frank wrote on Feb 6th, 2017 at 8:19pm:
polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 6th, 2017 at 8:58am:
Frank wrote on Feb 5th, 2017 at 9:14pm:
polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 5th, 2017 at 5:49pm:
freediver wrote on Feb 5th, 2017 at 8:51am:
What is a "racial marker" Gandalf? Is it something a Muslim uses to turn a non-racist statement into a racist one?


Tell me FD, do you reckon muslims are the only people who would consider the statement in my signature racist? And do you think anyone who considers it racist is necessarily involved in some sinister conspiracy to deflect attention away from criticism of Islam?

freediver wrote on Feb 5th, 2017 at 8:51am:
If intelligence is a marker, does that mean it is racist to say that doctors are intelligent?


doctors are not an ethno-cultural group, as I've mentioned before. They are a profession.



The Comparison of Mean IQ in Muslim and Non-Muslim CountriesDonald I. Templer

Abstract
The present research found that the Muslim country mean IQ of 81 is half a standard deviation below the mean IQ of non-Muslim nations and is not related to strength of Muslim culture as defined by the percentage of Muslims in the country. The mean IQ of 84 in Arab countries is not associated with per capita income and is incompatible with the intellectual achievements of the golden age of the Muslim Empire. Possible explanations for this decline include hybridization with sub-Saharan Africans, dysgenic decrease in the more educated Muslims employing birth control as suggested by Meisenberg, the Muslim religion not fostering critical thinking, and the intellectual contributions being both exaggerated and made by non-Muslims.




Ahem.....  Islam tends to make you thick, in other words.


You are quoting a well-known racist who believes negroes are intellectually deficient because of their genes. If you read the whole article, you'll see that of these "possible explanations" he actually argues against the one you highlighted - noting that "the strength of muslim culture does not seem very relevant to the IQ differences" and concluding that "It is here suggested that genetic factors are more important than economic/religious/cultural variables" - in explaining the IQ differences in arabs and muslims.

No, for old fashioned racists like Templer, it comes down to genetics, and his explanation is a far less nuanced one - simply that muslims became dumber once they started interbreeding with the inferior negroes.

So no, Islam doesn't tend to make you thick - according to Templar, interbreeding with inferior negroids makes you thick.


Prof Steve Jones, one of Britain’s most eminent scientists, has warned that the level of inbreeding among the nation’s Muslims is endangering the health of future generations.
By Jonathan Wynne-Jones Religious Affairs Correspondent8:15AM BST 29 May 2011

The geneticist said that it was common in the Islamic world for men to marry their nieces and cousins.
He said that Bradford has a particular problem and warned that it could affect the health of children born into these marriages.
Prof Jones, who lectures at University College London, is likely to find himself at the centre of controversy in the wake of the comments.
Similar remarks made by Phil Woolas, a Labour environment minister, in 2008 resulted in calls for him to be sacked from the government.
Prof Jones, who writes for the Telegraph’s science pages, told an audience at the Hay Festival: “There may be some evidence that cousins marrying one another can be harmful.
“It is common in the Islamic world to marry your brother’s daughter, which is actually closer than marrying your cousin.
“We should be concerned about that as there can be a lot of hidden genetic damage. Children are much more likely to get two copies of a damaged gene.”
He added: “Bradford is very inbred. There is a huge amount of cousins marrying each other there.” Research in Bradford has found that babies born to Pakistani women are twice as likely to die in their first year as babies born to white mothers, with genetic problems linked to inbreeding identified as a “significant” cause.
Studies have found that within the city, more than 70 per cent of marriages are between relations, with more than half involving first cousins.
Separate studies have found that while British Pakistanis make up three per cent of all births, they account for one in three British children born with genetic illnesses. Prof Jones also said that incest was more common than is often realised in every part of society, adding that it had been particular prevalent among royalty and suggested it is still ­continuing.


Culture, innit.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: What is racism?
Reply #724 - Feb 7th, 2017 at 6:40am
 
freediver wrote on Feb 6th, 2017 at 6:42pm:
I expect there is a reason you only included half the sentence


Yes there is FD, its called a character limit. Thats pretty funny though to pull out the old "quotey out of context" on that. What do you reckon the rest of the sentence said - "actually I'm just kidding - muslims are wonderful human beings"?

Feel free to increase the signature character limit and I'll happily post the entire sentence.

freediver wrote on Feb 6th, 2017 at 6:42pm:
You can actually choose to become a Muslim


All muslims today are born stupid, due to irreversible damage done to the muslim gene pool - as a result of 1400 years of inbreeding - according to moses. Thats the only way he can explain how people could follow such absurd texts. Try to keep up FD.
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49222
At my desk.
Re: What is racism?
Reply #725 - Feb 7th, 2017 at 8:21am
 
Gandalf, would it be fair to say that you have still not come up with a coherent definition of racism and that your efforts to racialise criticism of Islam actually compel you to muddy the waters as much as possible? Why did you start a thread called "What is racism?" if you were just going to spend 50 pages dodging that very question?

Have you given up on that BS about markers for markers for race?

Why does Muslim count as a race but not doctor? Have you changed your mind about whether doctors can be a marker for the purpose of racism?

Quote:
Yes there is FD, its called a character limit. Thats pretty funny though to pull out the old "quotey out of context" on that. What do you reckon the rest of the sentence said - "actually I'm just kidding - muslims are wonderful human beings"?


You want me to guess what the rest of the quote said?

I think you picked that sentence fragment because it is the closest thing Moses has said to all the lies you have been replacing his words with, like your little fantasy about a subspecies. You did not quote the whole sentence for the same reason you prefer to offer your "interpretation" of Moses' words rather than what he actually said.

Quote:
All muslims today are born stupid, due to irreversible damage done to the muslim gene pool - as a result of 1400 years of inbreeding - according to moses. Thats the only way he can explain how people could follow such absurd texts. Try to keep up FD.


Have you asked him to explain? Perhaps you could even ask him to explain his own words rather than your interpretation efforts.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Feb 7th, 2017 at 8:31am by freediver »  

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: What is racism?
Reply #726 - Feb 7th, 2017 at 9:33am
 
freediver wrote on Feb 7th, 2017 at 8:21am:
Gandalf, would it be fair to say that you have still not come up with a coherent definition of racism and that your efforts to racialise criticism of Islam actually compel you to muddy the waters as much as possible? Why did you start a thread called "What is racism?" if you were just going to spend 50 pages dodging that very question?

Have you given up on that BS about markers for markers for race?

Why does Muslim count as a race but not doctor? Have you changed your mind about whether doctors can be a marker for the purpose of racism?


My definition is very coherent, and I've basically been talking about nothing else for the whole thread. That said, the thread was started in order to get a coherent answer from you,  given the clear contradictions in your "explanations" thus far - not for me to explain my interpretation.

Still, I am happy to give and explain my definition, and I've been pretty much been doing nothing else the whole 49 pages of this thread - and counting.

Racism is denigrating ethno-cultural groups of people on the basis of 'racial markers' - which are stereotypes that 'racialise' the group in order to portray them as inferior, and portray the 'ingroup' as superior. It could be anything that defines the ethno-cultural group in the mind of the racist - skin colour, slanty eyes, turbans, the way they pee, or even level of intellect due to 1400 years of inbreeding. Therefore racism is not only the belief that one or more 'races' are superior/inferior, it also requires the belief that races can be defined (through racial markers) in the first place. This is the standard definition as used in the field - which you would know if you actually bothered to educate yourself. It is nothing to do with denigrating ideology/religion or professions.

freediver wrote on Feb 7th, 2017 at 8:21am:
You want me to guess what the rest of the quote said?


you don't have to guess FD - I helpfully provided the link on the sig. You can click on it and read the entire post whenever you see my post - if you like. Are you considering increasing the character limit for signatures? I would actually prefer to include the entire quote if I could.


freediver wrote on Feb 7th, 2017 at 8:21am:
Have you asked him to explain? Perhaps you could even ask him to explain his own words rather than your interpretation efforts.


http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1484972483/17#17
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49222
At my desk.
Re: What is racism?
Reply #727 - Feb 7th, 2017 at 12:06pm
 
Quote:
Racism is denigrating ethno-cultural groups of people on the basis of 'racial markers' - which are stereotypes that 'racialise' the group in order to portray them as inferior, and portray the 'ingroup' as superior. It could be anything that defines the ethno-cultural group in the mind of the racist - skin colour, slanty eyes, turbans, the way they pee, or even level of intellect due to 1400 years of inbreeding. Therefore racism is not only the belief that one or more 'races' are superior/inferior, it also requires the belief that races can be defined (through racial markers) in the first place. This is the standard definition as used in the field - which you would know if you actually bothered to educate yourself. It is nothing to do with denigrating ideology/religion or professions.


Why does clothing, religion and methods of peeing count, but not profession? What made you change your mind about whether doctors can be a marker for a marker for a stereotype that racialises an in group?

If our government believes it is possible to define aborigines for the purpose of giving them money, are they racist? If you believe it is possible to define English people for the purpose of forced mass migration, are you racist? And what if you follow a prophet who not only believed this, but followed through?

Your definition is also circular. You are saying that racism is when you racialise a group of people. But you still fall short of actually defining anything. There is a whole lot of waffle, but it still boils down to saying that racism is racism - which is exactly what you need to get away with racialising criticism of Islam. If you don't like it, you call it racism.

Did you have the link there when you first posted the poll?
Back to top
« Last Edit: Feb 7th, 2017 at 12:13pm by freediver »  

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 47083
Gender: male
Re: What is racism?
Reply #728 - Feb 7th, 2017 at 12:46pm
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 7th, 2017 at 9:33am:
Racism is denigrating ethno-cultural groups of people on the basis of 'racial markers' - which are stereotypes that 'racialise' the group in order to portray them as inferior, and portray the 'ingroup' as superior. It could be anything that defines the ethno-cultural group in the mind of the racist - skin colour, slanty eyes, turbans, the way they pee, or even level of intellect due to 1400 years of inbreeding. Therefore racism is not only the belief that one or more 'races' are superior/inferior, it also requires the belief that races can be defined (through racial markers) in the first place. This is the standard definition as used in the field - which you would know if you actually bothered to educate yourself. It is nothing to do with denigrating ideology/religion or professions.




You mean like Muhammed did with the Jews and now Muslims do who are his followers??

Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: What is racism?
Reply #729 - Feb 7th, 2017 at 1:02pm
 
freediver wrote on Feb 7th, 2017 at 12:06pm:
Why does clothing, religion and methods of peeing count, but not profession?


Professions are not an ethno-cultural group. How many times do I need to repeat this?

freediver wrote on Feb 7th, 2017 at 12:06pm:
If our government believes it is possible to define aborigines for the purpose of giving them money, are they racist? If you believe it is possible to define English people for the purpose of forced mass migration, are you racist? And what if you follow a prophet who not only believed this, but followed through?


There is no logic to any of this. Who is saying or indicating somehow that one 'race' is superior over the other? If that is happening, then its racist - simple. Don't over think this FD.

freediver wrote on Feb 7th, 2017 at 12:06pm:
Did you have the link there when you first posted the poll?


Yes. Not that it makes any difference - the rest of the sentence doesn't make it any less racist:

Quote:
Is it a coincidence that muslims have inbred themselves into a subgroup of low intelligence beings, who are stupid enough to absolutely worship every piece of filth and perversion in the qur'an as being irrevocably perfect and pure?

Or was it planed by evilness?


What do you reckon FD? Was the creation of a stupid race subspecies err I mean subgroup of beings through 1400 years of inbreeding a happy accident, or a sinister conspiracy that was planned from the beginning by an Smiley
evil mastermind
Smiley ? I think moses is leaning towards the latter. But we probably should check with him to confirm shouldn't we?



Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 96187
Gender: male
Re: What is racism?
Reply #730 - Feb 7th, 2017 at 3:50pm
 
Indeed we should, G. But we should check with FD first.

FD, was the retarded Muslim subspecies a cunning plan by the evil paedophile prophet Mohammed?

Do you concur with Moses?

And do you now contend that you can't possibly be racist because governments have policies to lift indigenous people out of poverty?

Don't overthink this, FD. A simple yes or no will suffice.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 96187
Gender: male
Re: What is racism?
Reply #731 - Feb 8th, 2017 at 4:04pm
 
Karnal wrote on Feb 6th, 2017 at 7:43pm:
freediver wrote on Feb 6th, 2017 at 6:42pm:
Gandalf, would it be fair to say that you have still not come up with a coherent definition of racism and that your efforts to racialise criticism of Islam actually compel you to muddy the waters as much as possible?

[quote]Tell me FD, do you reckon muslims are the only people who would consider the statement in my signature racist?


I expect there is a reason you only included half the sentence - the same reason why you put far more effort into "interpreting" what Moses says.

Quote:
And do you think anyone who considers it racist is necessarily involved in some sinister conspiracy to deflect attention away from criticism of Islam?


I think they are doing their best with half a sentence.

Quote:
doctors are not an ethno-cultural group, as I've mentioned before. They are a profession.


Neither are Muslims. Islam is a religion, remember. You can actually choose to become a Muslim far easier than you can choose to become a doctor. Remember, you are the one who insisted that "fake" racial grouping are equally legitimate for constructing racism. You have even conceded before that doctors could be such a grouping, when you were banging on about markers. Of course, you change your mind regularly, and you seem to have dropped the BS about markers completely.


No, FD, it is not fair to say that Moses' retarded inbred stance is some form of legitimate criticism of Islam, and nor is it reasonable.

It's completely delusional, as every schoolboy knows.

Yes, it may be easier to become a Muslim than a doctor, but it is not so easy to not become a Muslim, now is it? Trump has just tried to ban all religions from a handful of Muslim-majority nations. Your religion is not on your passport, you see.

And apart from your airport questions, you've been championing this very policy for years, no?

Not racist, of course. Syrians, Yemenis, Somalis, ooga-boogas, etc, are not a race.

But I'm curious. What do you think of Trump's Musel policy? Do you concur?

I've answered all your questions, FD. Do you think it would be fair to have a stab at this?

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49222
At my desk.
Re: What is racism?
Reply #732 - Feb 9th, 2017 at 12:39pm
 
Quote:
Professions are not an ethno-cultural group. How many times do I need to repeat this?


You previously said they could be a marker for a race. What is the difference between a marker for a race and an ethno-cultural group? Have you changed your mind on this, or is this some subtle distinction you are making? I have asked several times but never gotten a straight answer. Is this another example of you conceding something without telling anyone? Or perhaps you are simply dodging the question.

When you converted to Islam, did you change your ethno-cultural group?

Quote:
There is no logic to any of this. Who is saying or indicating somehow that one 'race' is superior over the other? If that is happening, then its racist - simple. Don't over think this FD.


I am saying they define a race for the purpose of handing out money. You said that it is racist to insist you can do this.

Quote:
Yes. Not that it makes any difference - the rest of the sentence doesn't make it any less racist:


I am pretty sure fewer people would have voted racist if you included the rant about the Koran, and even fewer if you used any of the other quotes you have used in the past that made it clear he was literally referring to inbreeding.

Quote:
What do you reckon FD? Was the creation of a stupid race subspecies err I mean subgroup of beings through 1400 years of inbreeding


You are putting word into his mouth again.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: What is racism?
Reply #733 - Feb 9th, 2017 at 1:05pm
 
freediver wrote on Feb 9th, 2017 at 12:39pm:
What is the difference between a marker for a race and an ethno-cultural group? Have you changed your mind on this, or is this some subtle distinction you are making? I have asked several times but never gotten a straight answer.


Because you are so clueless it just seems in your confused mind that I have never explained.

There is the most clear explanation in the world on this very page:

polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 7th, 2017 at 9:33am:
Racism is denigrating ethno-cultural groups of people on the basis of 'racial markers' - which are stereotypes that 'racialise' the group in order to portray them as inferior, and portray the 'ingroup' as superior. It could be anything that defines the ethno-cultural group in the mind of the racist - skin colour, slanty eyes, turbans, the way they pee, or even level of intellect due to 1400 years of inbreeding.


Go on FD, I double dare you to again pretend that I have never clearly explained the relationship between 'marker for a race' and 'ethno-cultural group'.

freediver wrote on Feb 9th, 2017 at 12:39pm:
I am saying they define a race for the purpose of handing out money. You said that it is racist to insist you can do this.


ummm no.

freediver wrote on Feb 9th, 2017 at 12:39pm:
I am pretty sure fewer people would have voted racist if you included the rant about the Koran


sure - because as soon as I include that, the bit about muslims being a "subgroup" of beings who are born stupid due to 1400 years of inbreeding must magically disappear.
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 96187
Gender: male
Re: What is racism?
Reply #734 - Feb 9th, 2017 at 1:08pm
 
Quote:
I have asked several times but I have never got a straight answer.


You're lucky, FD. I've never gotten an answer at all.

Quote:
Or perhaps you are simply dodging the question.


Do you think?
Back to top
« Last Edit: Feb 9th, 2017 at 1:13pm by Karnal »  
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 47 48 49 50 51 52
Send Topic Print