SadKangaroo wrote on Jun 10^th, 2018 at 8:21am:


another lie and made up scenario ..

you lie constantly and make up untrue statements

I have no enemies, kate spade was also a murder victim some suspect

I simply post information concerning his suspected murder .. it happens you know ,

or are you that sheltered in your suburban hideaway ..

The Death of Anthony Bourdain: Coverups, Lies, Connections, Fault, Causation & Media Redirection

and so you simply lie, spam and attack the poster

when ontopic posts are being posted on the appropriate thread ..

you do this to feel important somehow, you MUST be important , in your clouded mind ,

and so you lie , make up scenarios , and attack everything I post ,

you are indeed quite sad, yet exposed as we continue

Kate Spade Husband's Mouse Mask, Bourdain's Death - PIZZAGATE Connection?

OPEN SIGNALING - Andy Spade and Harvey Weinstein (Suicides of Kate Spade and Anthony Bourdain)

see the mouse mask * red scarf *

I made one mistake which I won't shy away from. 

Unlike yourself who seems to think that if you deflect or refuse to admit to your lies, as in you're showing further dishonesty, then it never happened, bravo.

Quote:


I had always admired Bourdain, I have all his books and loved his TV Shows.  It came as a real shock that he was hurting so much in his personal life that he would take such a drastic step.

The news hit hard and out of nowhere.

But to have people like you Light, some of the most dispicable characters out there who like yourself routinly exploit the abuse of children to fuel their political attacks and fantastic conspiracy propaganda to then take his passing and mix that into you shenanigans when there isn't a shred of supporting evidence AND the originating source is a not fake news site that just spread flat out lies (as you do) just proves who and what you really are and takes any possibility of genuine concern out of the mix for you.

Take it as a personal attack if you like, but mate, you're actions leave one to only conclude that you're scum.

Or perhaps it's more accurate to describe you as, Santorum.

But I know, you think you can just ignore this by reporting my mistake.  Go ahead.  As usual, you'll only be fooling yourself or those desperate enough to have support on their side that they'll humour you.

it_is_the_light wrote on Jun 12^th, 2018 at 7:08am:


Pot, Kettle, Black.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/lifestyle/1989/08/01/the-bombshell-that-d...

THE BOMBSHELL THAT DIDN'T EXPLODE

By Eleanor R and olph
August 1, 1989
With a story about "key officials of the Reagan and Bush administration" involved in a "callboy ring," the Washington Times in late June seemed poised to give this town the one thing it adores -- a summer scandal. But as of last week, journalists have been left debating whether the Times published a blockbuster or a "blockbluster," as one critic put it. The story is intriguing -- involving male prostitution and a lobbyist who used parties to promote his business connections and business connections to promote his parties. But is it a government scandal or just a sordid slice of life in a city that happens to be Washington, D.C.? Washington Times Editor in Chief Arnaud de Borchgrave, when asked whether the story is as big as his paper has advertised, says that the scandal is evolving. "This story is going to be much like Watergate," de Borchgrave said. "It will go on for months; each time you shake the tree, something else falls out of it." Numerous Washingtonians in recent weeks have said that the Times's exclusives, many of which have not been reprinted in other papers, are worthy of more effort from the thousands of reporters who work in Washington. "We can get a little too stuffy," said Stephen Hess, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution. "In some way, that's a classic story. It's just that the press has become so professional that we have a class structure built in now and we look down our noses at yellow journalism -- the kind that Hearst and Pulitzer made their reputations with." Other journalists in Washington are not so certain. "Where's the beef? I can't figure out what's going on here," said James Glassman, editor and publisher of Roll Call, a twice-weekly newspaper that covers Congress. "I don't think there's much substance to it, but it's a good old-fashioned, sell-newspapers kind of journalism." The story began, many journalists say now, on Feb. 28 with what appeared to be a routine raid by D.C. police and the U.S. Secret Service on a house in the 6000 block of 34th Place NW. Sources have told reporters that the primary purpose for the raid by D.C. police was to investigate a male prostitution call service. The Secret Service, which investigates most credit card fraud, was there to determine whether operators of the prostitution service were using customers' card numbers illegally. After the raid, the house remained cluttered with stacks of documents, furniture and an odd variety of carved, stuffed and miniature elephants -- believed to be the collection of one of the tenants. When U.S. marshals came to evict the tenants' belongings, the owner and her lawyer, Marc Moskowitz, promised some reporters a chance to rummage through the debris. In many cases, Moskowitz agreed to give reporters access to the house if they would not mention the owner's name. Three months after the raid, after U.S. marshals swept furniture and belongings onto the sidewalk, Moskowitz gave reporters the walk-through. When the journalists saw documents -- pages from ledgers, a diary, pornographic pictures or toys -- he said they could take them. Reporters hauled paper away in boxes, he said. "It was like a garage sale. It was like a carnival atmosphere," Moskowitz said. Among news organizations that had reporters carting away ledgers and documents from the house, according to Moskowitz, were The Washington Post, Regardie's, Channel 9 (WUSA) and Channel 4 (WRC). Moskowitz said he did not see a reporter from the Washington Times, but de Borchgrave said, "We had our people there, and we all divided the goodies." The piecemeal distribution of these documents kept many journalists wondering who had what. Rumors proliferated in Washington that the documents revealed names of famous clients of the prostitution service that allegedly was operating out of the house. For example, Moskowitz and a number of reporters who covered this story said they had heard that Regardie's reporter Keith Girard carried out a diary full of "some big names," as Moskowitz put it. "It's more like an engagement book," said Girard. "It's interesting but there's nothing in it, in and of itself, that is particularly revealing about politicians or anything." Girard and other reporters who looked through the data said that they found information implicating doctors or lawyers who could afford the service's steep fees, which started at $150 and rapidly escalated. "We checked into it; we sent reporters out when they raided the house in February and again when they had the eviction," said Jack Nelson, Washington bureau chief of the Los Angeles Times. "We never did turn up with anything that looked like a national story. "To tell the truth, the reason editors in L.A. weren't interested in it was that the New York Times and The Washington Post hadn't been interested in it," said Nelson. "If they had, our editors would have said, 'Where's the story?' " Howell Raines, the New York Times's Washington bureau chief, said his paper ran a short story on the resignation of a Labor Department aide who quit after he was named by the Washington Times as being part of the scandal. "I don't take the Washington Times seriously as a journalistic entity, so I view with suspicion almost anything that they do,

De Niro's Dark Dirty Secret Comes Out After He Sneaks Into UN For Showdown With Trump!

https://theintercept.com/2018/01/23/robert-de-niro-barbuda-hotel-hurricane-irma/

ROBERT DE NIRO ACCUSED OF EXPLOITING HURRICANE IRMA TO BUILD RESORT IN BARBUDA

A CHORUS OF VOICES from the Caribbean island of Barbuda is accusing Robert De Niro of being part of a backroom effort to exploit a devastating hurricane to fundamentally change the island’s communal land ownership law in the interest of developers — changes opposed by many Barbudans, but which could aid the actor’s controversial plans to build a large luxury resort called Paradise Found Nobu.

Earlier this month, with almost no international news coverage and with the majority of Barbudans still displaced from the storm, an amendment to the law in question was quietly pushed through the Senate of Antigua and Barbuda — a body dominated by politicians from the wealthier and more populous island of Antigua. If the amendment stands, a tradition of communal land rights that dates back to the abolition of slavery in 1834 — and which has protected Barbuda as a rare beacon of sustainable development in the Caribbean — will be extinguished.

But as news of the change trickles out, Barbudans are fighting back, challenging the legality of the amendment to the Barbuda Land Act. And they say the island’s highest-profile investor, Robert De Niro, stands to benefit most.

“It’s just a scam to take away the land from the Barbudans so they can give it to people like Robert de Niro,” said Mackenzie Frank, a former senator from the island. “Anyone who has beach land is laughing all the way to the bank.”

De Niro, who has so far stayed silent as the controversy has grown, did not respond to The Intercept’s requests for comment.

Up until the recent changes, land in Barbuda was held in common: It could not be bought or sold, and though developers could lease land for 50 years, their projects needed to win the consent of a majority of Barbudans. It was a rare example of participatory economic planning and successful land redistribution to freed slaves and their descendants.

But the Land Act was resented by foreign investors and wealthy Antiguans, and the latest push to alter the law first reared its head just days after Hurricane Irma roared through Barbuda. The island had been hit by storms before, but never like this: Upwards of 90 percent of the buildings in Barbuda were damaged, and all residents were evacuated to Antigua.

https://www.smh.com.au/business/hurricane-irma-hits-james-packer-and-robert-de-n...

Hurricane Irma hits James Packer and Robert De Niro's Caribbean resort plans

James Packer was probably hoping for a quiet lead-up to his 50th birthday this weekend at his Argentinian polo ranch, Ellerstina, on the outskirts of Buenos Aires.



Hurricane Irma changed all that when it tore apart the Carribean island of Barbuda this week. This is the island that will be home to the $US250 million ($310.7 million) luxury resort that Packer is building in partnership with Hollywood legend Robert De Niro.

"Barbuda now is literally rubble," said Gaston Browne, the Prime Minister of Antigua and Barbuda, after the devastating hurricane.

SadKangaroo wrote on Jun 12^th, 2018 at 7:51am:


Sad, Master Light posts relevant on topic information - the contents of which you obviously disagree with. Either refute the info or don't comment. Personal attacks make you look foolish.

Also you claim he is a liar - so back up your claims with examples or go away.

Richdude wrote on Jun 12^th, 2018 at 11:59pm:


He posts information proven to be untrue, and he knows it.

I've shown this to him time and time again, he doubles down, reposts the same thing (often word for word in an attempt to spam away the facts that disprove his claims) then follows it up which childish memes.

It's happened 100s of times in almost every corner of this forum that he posts.

From posting images of firefighting aircraft claiming it to be evidence of a chemtrail conspiracy, being shown the facts that it is in fact firefighting gear, he reposts the same images with crybaby gifs to follow.

His points get disproved, he's shown why, ignores it, continues lying.

This has happened in Drain the Swamp, Chemtrails, Flat Earth, Pizzagate, various threads about the lies Trump has told at rallies and speeches, UFO/Alien threads, the various threads about school shootings etc etc, the list keeps going on and on and on and he does the same thing everywhere.

He takes the opinion of a fringe conspiracy blogger/youtuber, presents it as a fact (first lie), then when provided with truth AND the facts and evidence to back it up, he cherry picks quotes, ignores the cited proof that questions his lies, reposts his lies and attacks those who call him out.

Rich, you're a clever man.  You've seen this happen time and time again, you know what's going on.

Don't let your desire to believe the information he spreads cloud you from the truth too...