Australian Politics Forum - Trumps own SCOTUS nominee skewers him

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Trumps own SCOTUS nominee skewers him
Reply #15 - Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:18pm

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:13pm:

Im not sure, im going to need more information, straight from the horses mouth.

LOL...

let me guess how this goes.

A poster goes to lengths to list all the offensive and stupid Trump comments and tweets and then you scream FAKE NEWS and go on your normal deluded way.

The link in the OP can give you all you need to know... but we know you wont do that.

'The delusion is strong in this one...'

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 75097
Gender: male

Re: Trumps own SCOTUS nominee skewers him
Reply #16 - Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:25pm

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:07pm:

John Smith wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:03pm:

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:01pm:

John Smith wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 4:59pm:

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 4:54pm:

John Smith wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 4:28pm:

expect a lot more of his 'yes men' to turn on him

I dont think you know what a yes man is.

you think trump would have nominated anyone who he didn't think was going to toe his line? Cheesy

What does it look like smith?

what does what look like Honky?

Well obviously he has nominated someone for another reason than just to "toe his line". Maybe its because he'd be a good fit for yhe job?

like his education secretary? Cheesy

Probably the only thing stopping him putting a family member in as a supreme court judge was the fact that they have to be qualified.

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

...

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male

Re: Trumps own SCOTUS nominee skewers him
Reply #17 - Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:25pm

Quote:

Neil Gorsuch told a Democratic senator in a private meeting that President Trump's tweets attacking a fellow judge were "demoralising".

Senator Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut told the press after the meeting that Gorsuch was not impressed with the president's behaviour.

Interesting that only one word was a direct quotation from Neil Gorsuch, while the rest of the fluff was spoken by Richard Blumenthal.

As I said, I need more information straight from the horses mouth.

Back to top

In the fullness of time...

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Trumps own SCOTUS nominee skewers him
Reply #18 - Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:33pm

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:25pm:

Quote:

Neil Gorsuch told a Democratic senator in a private meeting that President Trump's tweets attacking a fellow judge were "demoralising".

Senator Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut told the press after the meeting that Gorsuch was not impressed with the president's behaviour.

Interesting that only one word was a direct quotation from Neil Gorsuch, while the rest of the fluff was spoken by Richard Blumenthal.

As I said, I need more information straight from the horses mouth.

and there we go... more of the 'fake news' delusion.

idiot.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 75097
Gender: male

Re: Trumps own SCOTUS nominee skewers him
Reply #19 - Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:35pm

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:25pm:

Interesting that only one word was a direct quotation from Neil Gorsuch, while the rest of the fluff was spoken by Richard Blumenthal.

As I said, I need more information straight from the horses mouth.

you must have missed this bit Cheesy

A spokesperson for Gorsuch later confirmed the exchange.

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

...

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male

Re: Trumps own SCOTUS nominee skewers him
Reply #20 - Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:39pm

John Smith wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:35pm:

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:25pm:

Interesting that only one word was a direct quotation from Neil Gorsuch, while the rest of the fluff was spoken by Richard Blumenthal.

As I said, I need more information straight from the horses mouth.

you must have missed this bit Cheesy

A spokesperson for Gorsuch later confirmed the exchange.

No, I did not miss that, I'm simply better at finding meaning than you are.

This says that a spokesperson confirmed AN exchange, not that this particular rendition of it is verbatim.

Back to top

In the fullness of time...

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Trumps own SCOTUS nominee skewers him
Reply #21 - Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:39pm

John Smith wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:35pm:

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:25pm:

Interesting that only one word was a direct quotation from Neil Gorsuch, while the rest of the fluff was spoken by Richard Blumenthal.

As I said, I need more information straight from the horses mouth.

you must have missed this bit Cheesy

A spokesperson for Gorsuch later confirmed the exchange.

He missed the entire thing including all the tweets themselves.

It is fun watching trumpoid twist around like this.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Trumps own SCOTUS nominee skewers him
Reply #22 - Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:41pm

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:39pm:

John Smith wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:35pm:

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:25pm:

Interesting that only one word was a direct quotation from Neil Gorsuch, while the rest of the fluff was spoken by Richard Blumenthal.

As I said, I need more information straight from the horses mouth.

you must have missed this bit Cheesy

A spokesperson for Gorsuch later confirmed the exchange.

No, I did not miss that, I'm simply better at finding meaning than you are.

This says that a spokesperson confirmed AN exchange, not that this particular rendition of it is verbatim.

LOL you are better at AVOIDING meaning. The meaning is very clear that the exchange happened exactly as reported.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

John Smith Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 75097 Gender:	Re: Trumps own SCOTUS nominee skewers him Reply #23 - Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:41pm ... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:39pm: No, I did not miss that, I'm simply better at finding meaning than you are. This says that a spokesperson confirmed AN exchange, not that this particular rendition of it is verbatim. actually he confirmed THE exchange
Back to top	Our esteemed leader: I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus. IP Logged

...

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male

Re: Trumps own SCOTUS nominee skewers him
Reply #24 - Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:43pm

John Smith wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:41pm:

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:39pm:

No, I did not miss that, I'm simply better at finding meaning than you are.

This says that a spokesperson confirmed AN exchange, not that this particular rendition of it is verbatim.

actually he confirmed THE exchange Cheesy

All that we're given is one word - that cannot, by definition, be an exchange.

All I need is peoples own words. Is that too much to ask?

Back to top

In the fullness of time...

IP Logged

...

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male

Re: Trumps own SCOTUS nominee skewers him
Reply #25 - Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:44pm

longweekend58 wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:41pm:

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:39pm:

John Smith wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:35pm:

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:25pm:

Interesting that only one word was a direct quotation from Neil Gorsuch, while the rest of the fluff was spoken by Richard Blumenthal.

As I said, I need more information straight from the horses mouth.

you must have missed this bit Cheesy

A spokesperson for Gorsuch later confirmed the exchange.

No, I did not miss that, I'm simply better at finding meaning than you are.

This says that a spokesperson confirmed AN exchange, not that this particular rendition of it is verbatim.

LOL you are better at AVOIDING meaning. The meaning is very clear that the exchange happened exactly as reported.

How easily and uncritically you accept what fits with your prejudices.

Don't worry, you're not alone on that score.

Back to top

In the fullness of time...

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Trumps own SCOTUS nominee skewers him
Reply #26 - Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:45pm

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:43pm:

John Smith wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:41pm:

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:39pm:

No, I did not miss that, I'm simply better at finding meaning than you are.

This says that a spokesperson confirmed AN exchange, not that this particular rendition of it is verbatim.

actually he confirmed THE exchange Cheesy

All that we're given is one word - that cannot, by definition, be an exchange.

All I need is peoples own words. Is that too much to ask?

in this case, yes. You were not party to an unrecorded conversation. You are however party to the summation of that conversaion and its salient points as agreed to by BOTH parties.

You cannot continue to deny the undeniable.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Trumps own SCOTUS nominee skewers him
Reply #27 - Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:47pm

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:44pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:41pm:

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:39pm:

John Smith wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:35pm:

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:25pm:

Interesting that only one word was a direct quotation from Neil Gorsuch, while the rest of the fluff was spoken by Richard Blumenthal.

As I said, I need more information straight from the horses mouth.

you must have missed this bit Cheesy

A spokesperson for Gorsuch later confirmed the exchange.

No, I did not miss that, I'm simply better at finding meaning than you are.

This says that a spokesperson confirmed AN exchange, not that this particular rendition of it is verbatim.

LOL you are better at AVOIDING meaning. The meaning is very clear that the exchange happened exactly as reported.

How easily and uncritically you accept what fits with your prejudices.

Don't worry, you're not alone on that score.

tell me... how many people (approx) were physically at the Trump inauguration? was it bigger than Obama's in 2009 as Trump has claime or not?

this is an easy answer for an intelligent person.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

...

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male

Re: Trumps own SCOTUS nominee skewers him
Reply #28 - Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:48pm

longweekend58 wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:45pm:

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:43pm:

John Smith wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:41pm:

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:39pm:

No, I did not miss that, I'm simply better at finding meaning than you are.

This says that a spokesperson confirmed AN exchange, not that this particular rendition of it is verbatim.

actually he confirmed THE exchange Cheesy

All that we're given is one word - that cannot, by definition, be an exchange.

All I need is peoples own words. Is that too much to ask?

in this case, yes.

Then how could a reasonable person unequivocally state an opinion on something, when the only available source has been injected with bias?

How I ask you - how?

Back to top

In the fullness of time...

IP Logged

...

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male

Re: Trumps own SCOTUS nominee skewers him
Reply #29 - Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:49pm

longweekend58 wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:47pm:

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:44pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:41pm:

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:39pm:

John Smith wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:35pm:

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:25pm:

Interesting that only one word was a direct quotation from Neil Gorsuch, while the rest of the fluff was spoken by Richard Blumenthal.

As I said, I need more information straight from the horses mouth.

you must have missed this bit Cheesy

A spokesperson for Gorsuch later confirmed the exchange.

No, I did not miss that, I'm simply better at finding meaning than you are.

This says that a spokesperson confirmed AN exchange, not that this particular rendition of it is verbatim.

LOL you are better at AVOIDING meaning. The meaning is very clear that the exchange happened exactly as reported.

How easily and uncritically you accept what fits with your prejudices.

Don't worry, you're not alone on that score.

tell me... how many people (approx) were physically at the Trump inauguration? was it bigger than Obama's in 2009 as Trump has claime or not?

this is an easy answer for an intelligent person.

Physically at the inauguration - no it was not.

But undoubtedly it was the most witnessed inauguration ever.

If you bothered listening to sean Spicers own words, this would not confuse you so.

Back to top

In the fullness of time...

IP Logged