Brian Ross wrote on Feb 15
th, 2017 at 7:03pm:
Yadda, if you seek to hide yourself behind a pseudonym then you cannot claim that pseudonym is your real name.
I doubt anybody would seek you out to hurt you.
I have been online now for over 25 years, always using my real name/login. I have upset a lot of people in that time and guess what, I am still alive, uncrippled and still upsetting people.
Come out of your cupboard. It will do you good. Face the light. Indeed, see the light!
LOLBrian,
Your assessment, as to my continued personal safety [should i reveal my RL identity], imo,
defies reason.
Your passing assurance [as to our general safety in the world], imo, blatantly ignores or denies, the rather obvious nature and character, of the follower of ISLAM,
as a type.
Deceitful, intimidatory, violent.Yadda said/argued.....
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1421614428/709#709 Quote:
The entire history of ISLAM attests to the fact that the use of terror [by moslems] has served the interests of moslems/ISLAM well.
Mohammed himself attested to that fact [that terrorism works] in the Hadith.
Moslems have come to understand [through previous experience], that if they threaten violence against a group, very often the mere threat of their violence [intimidation], will have an effect which is to the advantage of 'the moslem'.
This consequence occurs, because those who have been threatened [by 'the moslem'] will often see no harm in appeasing 'the moslem' in his demands, in order to avoid the other 'consequences' of displeasing him.
....
freedom of speech = = the freedom to express ideas and concepts.
But, moslems reject all ideas and concepts which they [moslems] deem to be un-ISLAMIC in their basis, OR, ideas and concepts which they [moslems] deem to threaten the integrity of the ideas and concepts which ISLAM itself, promotes in the world.
And in that, we come back to a necessary recognition by us, of the wholly supremacist [fascist] nature of ISLAM.
i.e.
[Wherever moslems have become a significantly large minority, within a larger non-moslem host community]....
ISLAM takes to itself, the 'divine' right to oppose and prohibit the broadcasting of any ideas and concepts which do not actively promote the interests of ISLAM/moslems - on pain of death! [e.g. Charlie Hebdo attacks, Copenhagen attacks, etc]
i.e.
Moslems try to impose a new 'reasonable' 'idea', upon those that they [moslems] live among, the new and 'reasonable' idea, that scrutiny and criticism of the ideas and concepts which ISLAM promotes in the world, should be strictly prohibited.
Why so ?
Because the masters of ISLAM [i.e. the clerics] know that there is no benefit to ISLAM, if they were to ever allow any scrutiny [and consequent criticism] of the ideas and concepts which ISLAM promotes in the world.
Any scrutiny [and consequent criticism] of ISLAM, can never serve the interests of ISLAM/moslems.
Any scrutiny [and consequent criticism] of ISLAM, can only ever be to the detriment of the interests of ISLAM/moslems !!
Brian Ross,
As to my 'identity' and my persona...
I am here!
I am, 'identified'! ....everyone who frequents OzPol regularly, and has read more than say, 5 of my posts, will probably have an opinion about 'Yadda'.
And in fact, the truth is, that if i had a personality that wanted to hide 'who i am', from the world, then i doubt that i would be here, on this public forum, posting my 'egregious' opinions, on OzPol.
Brian,
No one needs to intimately know the identity of any person who may express something on a public forum,
in order to know if they agree [or disagree] with his/her expressed opinions on any particular topic.
Thankfully, to personally benefit from the 'value' of a worthy or 'good idea' or opinion, which is being publicly expressed, all we need do, is to be exposed to that idea or opinion.
[And contrawise, whenever we are exposed to an 'idea' or opinion with which we disagree, we 'instantly' know, that we disagree with it.]
And on a public forum, such as this, if we ever come across some opinion, or some argument with which we vehemently disagree with,
what then ?
-------- >
Yadda said.....
Quote:
"And if the detractors [of certain comments i have made] have a legitimate complaint, then let them air it [IN THE FORUM], and have their complaint tested in debate!
.....FOR ALL TO SEE.
.....Open societies do not fear the opinions of fools.
....they rather, EXPOSE and laugh at folly!
In any free and open debate, if a 'position' is absurd, if an 'argument' is absurd,
...then the debater is [often] condemned to all, WITH HIS OWN WORDS.
And isn't the exposure of folly, and error, THE VERY FUNCTION, of free and open debate?
Free and open debate *is meant* to be a contest of ideas!
....where every folly is revealed."
The ideas and concepts, which flow from the human psyche, are often 'well expressed' in our common words, imo.
And in common words, we will often instantly identify, either merit or folly being expressed.....
We are what we repeatedly do.
Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit.
- Aristotle
"Glory follows virtue as if it were its shadow."
- Marcus Tullius Cicero, Roman Statesman
Forum
Pages: 
