Aussie wrote on Feb 12
th, 2017 at 9:15pm:
Geez you are a piece of work FD. Why do you misrepresent what people post? I guess you do because that is the only way you can appear to be advancing a stupid position.
Quote:Perhaps Aussie thinks that "Jew" is the only thing that counts as a "group".
Why did you omit, edit out, the descriptor.....
cultural from this definition I adopted:
Quote:"the deliberate and systematic extermination of a national, racial, political, or
cultural
group"
What makes you think I did that Aussie?
Quote:No-one (with a brain) has tried that because they know the response will be that a tribe is part of a cultural group, not the whole group.
The "whole group" being "every Jew"?
Quote:And definitely don't mention that Gandalf specifically said the 'mindless collective' phenomenon was not specific to the jewish tribe, or to being jew - as he is clearly dishonestly implying.
Are you saying you would racialise other groups even when not trying to justify genocide?
Quote:The reality is, the massacre almost certainly never happened - the "account" of the massacre has clearly been lifted from another massacre of jews by Romans during the Roman occupation. It is also directly contradicted by the Quran itself - which states that only some of the military aged males were executed, while some were imprisoned. This is consistent with other sources which states that only the ring leaders were executed, and the rest were spared.
Why do you think wikipedia gets it so wrong?
Quote:Whats interesting here though is how FD has suddenly discovered his moral compass now that he has (yet again) brought up the issue of muslims attacking jews.
Are you suggesting I never criticised your racist support for genocide before?
Quote:but mention an alleged 1400 year old massacre of male warriors who took up arms
Previously you insisted they were slaughtered for treachery. Have you changed your mind, or simply invented a more convenient excuse? They never actually took up arms. No-one was killed until Muhammed slaughtered the entire tribe. If they actually took up arms, you would feel no need to justify the genocide by saying they were all liable for the supposed treason of a few because of the outgroup homogeneity. Bottom line is, 800 innocent people were killed, without trial, and you justify this with the most absurd racial stereotypes one can imagine, even using the alleged crimes of completely different Jewish tribes.
If only the warriors were executed, why did they check which boys had pubes in order to decide who dies? Is that how Muslims are supposed to think? Grass on the wicket, it's either time to play cricket (if it's a girl) or time to die if it's a boy?
Forum
Pages: 
