Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 9
Send Topic Print
Muhammed committed genocide (Read 8831 times)
Unforgiven
Gold Member
*****
Offline


I have sinned

Posts: 8879
Gender: male
Re: Muhammed committed genocide
Reply #45 - Feb 13th, 2017 at 10:16pm
 
The Shabra Shatila massacre was an act of genocide fomented by Israel.

...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sabra_and_Shatila_massacre

Quote:
Sabra and Shatila massacre

The Sabra and Shatila massacre was the killing of between 762 and 3,500 civilians, mostly Palestinians and Lebanese Shiites, by a militia close to the Kataeb Party, also called Phalange, a predominantly Christian Lebanese right-wing party in the Sabra neighborhood and the adjacent Shatila refugee camp in Beirut, Lebanon. From approximately 18:00 on 16 September to 08:00 on 18 September 1982, a widespread massacre was carried out by the militia virtually under the eyes of their Israeli allies.[4][5][6][7]

The Phalanges, allies to the Israeli Defence Forces (IDF), were ordered by the IDF to clear out Sabra and Shatila from Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) fighters, as part of the IDF maneuvering into West Beirut. The IDF received reports of some of the Phalanges atrocities in Sabra and Shatila but failed to stop them.[8]

The massacre was presented as retaliation for the assassination of newly elected Lebanese president Bachir Gemayel, the leader of the Lebanese Kataeb Party. It was wrongly assumed that Palestinian militants had carried out the assassination. In June 1982, the Israel Defense Forces had invaded Lebanon with the intention of rooting out the PLO. By mid-1982, under the supervision of the Multinational Force, the PLO withdrew from Lebanon following weeks of battles in West Beirut and shortly before the massacre took place.

Various forces — Israeli, Phalangists and possibly also the South Lebanon Army (SLA) — were in the vicinity of Sabra and Shatila at the time of the slaughter, taking advantage of the fact that the Multinational Force had removed barracks and mines that had encircled Beirut's predominantly Muslim neighborhoods and kept the Israelis at bay during the Beirut siege.[9] The Israeli advance over West Beirut in the wake of the PLO withdrawal, which enabled the Phalangist raid, was considered a violation of the ceasefire agreement between the various forces.[10] The Israeli Army surrounded Sabra and Shatila and stationed troops at the exits of the area to prevent camp residents from leaving and, at the Phalangists' request,[11] fired illuminating flares at night.[12][13]

According to Alain Menargues, the direct perpetrators of the killings were the "Young Men", a gang recruited by Elie Hobeika, a prominent figure in the Phalanges, the Lebanese Forces intelligence chief and liaison officer with Mossad, from men who had been expelled from the Lebanese Forces for insubordination or criminal activities.[14] The killings are widely believed to have taken place under Hobeika's direct orders. Hobeika's family and fiancée had been murdered by Palestinian militiamen, and their Lebanese allies, at the Damour massacre of 1976,[15][16] itself a response to the 1976 Karantina massacre of Palestinians and Lebanese Muslims at the hands of Christian militants. Hobeika later became a long-serving Member of the Parliament of Lebanon and served in several ministerial roles.[17] Other Phalangist commanders involved were Joseph Edde from South Lebanon, Dib Anasta, head of the Phalangist Military Police, Michael Zouein, and Maroun Mischalani from East Beirut. In all 300–400 militiamen were involved, including some from Sa'ad Haddad's South Lebanon Army.[18]

In 1983, a commission chaired by Seán MacBride, the assistant to the UN Secretary General and President of United Nations General Assembly at the time, concluded that Israel, as the camp's occupying power, bore responsibility for the violence.[19] The commission also concluded that the massacre was a form of genocide.[20]

In 1983, the Israeli Kahan Commission, appointed to investigate the incident, found that Israeli military personnel, aware that a massacre was in progress, had failed to take serious steps to stop it. The commission deemed Israel indirectly responsible, and Ariel Sharon, then Defense Minister, bore personal responsibility "for ignoring the danger of bloodshed and revenge", forcing him to resign.[21]
...
Back to top
 

“I’ll let you be in my dreams if I can be in yours” Bob Dylan
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 96364
Re: Muhammed committed genocide
Reply #46 - Feb 13th, 2017 at 11:55pm
 
Aussie wrote on Feb 13th, 2017 at 9:42pm:
Bugger!  I thought I asked him all that with the short:

Quote:
Do your believe that Snow White was the fairest of them all, FD?

Check your bathroom mirror.  It might be you who is.


Embarrassed


Or we could ask him this:

FD, are you tinted?

Remember, there are no right or wrong answers.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 96364
Re: Muhammed committed genocide
Reply #47 - Feb 13th, 2017 at 11:56pm
 
Unforgiven wrote on Feb 13th, 2017 at 10:16pm:
The Shabra Shatila massacre was an act of genocide fomented by Israel.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/4/42/Massacre_of_palestinians_in_shati...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sabra_and_Shatila_massacre

Quote:
Sabra and Shatila massacre

The Sabra and Shatila massacre was the killing of between 762 and 3,500 civilians, mostly Palestinians and Lebanese Shiites, by a militia close to the Kataeb Party, also called Phalange, a predominantly Christian Lebanese right-wing party in the Sabra neighborhood and the adjacent Shatila refugee camp in Beirut, Lebanon. From approximately 18:00 on 16 September to 08:00 on 18 September 1982, a widespread massacre was carried out by the militia virtually under the eyes of their Israeli allies.[4][5][6][7]

The Phalanges, allies to the Israeli Defence Forces (IDF), were ordered by the IDF to clear out Sabra and Shatila from Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) fighters, as part of the IDF maneuvering into West Beirut. The IDF received reports of some of the Phalanges atrocities in Sabra and Shatila but failed to stop them.[8]

The massacre was presented as retaliation for the assassination of newly elected Lebanese president Bachir Gemayel, the leader of the Lebanese Kataeb Party. It was wrongly assumed that Palestinian militants had carried out the assassination. In June 1982, the Israel Defense Forces had invaded Lebanon with the intention of rooting out the PLO. By mid-1982, under the supervision of the Multinational Force, the PLO withdrew from Lebanon following weeks of battles in West Beirut and shortly before the massacre took place.

Various forces — Israeli, Phalangists and possibly also the South Lebanon Army (SLA) — were in the vicinity of Sabra and Shatila at the time of the slaughter, taking advantage of the fact that the Multinational Force had removed barracks and mines that had encircled Beirut's predominantly Muslim neighborhoods and kept the Israelis at bay during the Beirut siege.[9] The Israeli advance over West Beirut in the wake of the PLO withdrawal, which enabled the Phalangist raid, was considered a violation of the ceasefire agreement between the various forces.[10] The Israeli Army surrounded Sabra and Shatila and stationed troops at the exits of the area to prevent camp residents from leaving and, at the Phalangists' request,[11] fired illuminating flares at night.[12][13]

According to Alain Menargues, the direct perpetrators of the killings were the "Young Men", a gang recruited by Elie Hobeika, a prominent figure in the Phalanges, the Lebanese Forces intelligence chief and liaison officer with Mossad, from men who had been expelled from the Lebanese Forces for insubordination or criminal activities.[14] The killings are widely believed to have taken place under Hobeika's direct orders. Hobeika's family and fiancée had been murdered by Palestinian militiamen, and their Lebanese allies, at the Damour massacre of 1976,[15][16] itself a response to the 1976 Karantina massacre of Palestinians and Lebanese Muslims at the hands of Christian militants. Hobeika later became a long-serving Member of the Parliament of Lebanon and served in several ministerial roles.[17] Other Phalangist commanders involved were Joseph Edde from South Lebanon, Dib Anasta, head of the Phalangist Military Police, Michael Zouein, and Maroun Mischalani from East Beirut. In all 300–400 militiamen were involved, including some from Sa'ad Haddad's South Lebanon Army.[18]

In 1983, a commission chaired by Seán MacBride, the assistant to the UN Secretary General and President of United Nations General Assembly at the time, concluded that Israel, as the camp's occupying power, bore responsibility for the violence.[19] The commission also concluded that the massacre was a form of genocide.[20]

In 1983, the Israeli Kahan Commission, appointed to investigate the incident, found that Israeli military personnel, aware that a massacre was in progress, had failed to take serious steps to stop it. The commission deemed Israel indirectly responsible, and Ariel Sharon, then Defense Minister, bore personal responsibility "for ignoring the danger of bloodshed and revenge", forcing him to resign.[21]
...


FD doesn't discuss modern history, Forgiven, he's more of a classics scholar.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Unforgiven
Gold Member
*****
Offline


I have sinned

Posts: 8879
Gender: male
Re: Muhammed committed genocide
Reply #48 - Feb 14th, 2017 at 1:07am
 
Karnal wrote on Feb 13th, 2017 at 11:56pm:
FD doesn't discuss modern history, Forgiven, he's more of a classics scholar.


Classic propaganda? Classic fantasy? Classic fake news? or all three?
Back to top
 

“I’ll let you be in my dreams if I can be in yours” Bob Dylan
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 96364
Re: Muhammed committed genocide
Reply #49 - Feb 14th, 2017 at 10:20am
 
Unforgiven wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 1:07am:
Karnal wrote on Feb 13th, 2017 at 11:56pm:
FD doesn't discuss modern history, Forgiven, he's more of a classics scholar.


Classic propaganda? Classic fantasy? Classic fake news? or all three?


I'm not sure. He sort of makes things up and attaches them to inbreeding graphs.

Classic Freeeeedom, I think it's called.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Online


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49347
At my desk.
Re: Muhammed committed genocide
Reply #50 - Feb 14th, 2017 at 3:47pm
 
Aussie wrote on Feb 13th, 2017 at 7:56pm:
freediver wrote on Feb 13th, 2017 at 7:42pm:
Are you saying that the only possible explanation for Muhammed murdering 800 people in one day without trial is that they were all treacherous arseholes?


No, are you?  I said that 'I dunno.'

What does your favoured fable say FD?


You did not say you don't know. You were very sure about the treacherous assholes bit. Do you always make up excuses for Islamic genocide at the same time as insisting you do not know if it even happened? How can you be so sure that if Muhammed murdered all those people, then all 800 of them were treacherous assholes?

There is enough there to convince both most Muslims and most historians. You said that if the fable is true, that is how it happened. But the only justification Muhammed needed to slaughter all those people was an angel telling him to. Apparently Muhammed was planning on taking a bath.

All of Gandalf's racist propaganda about mindless collectives, no individuality, personality defined by your tribe, lessons learned from allowing other tribes of Jews to live etc, are all more recent additions by Muslims who have finally realised that the story needs more spin. Chances are some of them are Gandalf's own personal fabrications, before he decided to go with "it's all another Jewish conspiracy."

What do you think of Gandalf's excuses?

You still have not explained how you went from "a national, racial, political, or cultural group" to "every Jew". When you see a Jew, is "Jew" the only group you can imagine them belonging to? Why are you so committed to protecting Muhammed from a charge of genocide that you would deliberately misinterpret your own definition?
Back to top
« Last Edit: Feb 14th, 2017 at 3:55pm by freediver »  

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 96364
Re: Muhammed committed genocide
Reply #51 - Feb 14th, 2017 at 4:03pm
 
freediver wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 3:47pm:
Aussie wrote on Feb 13th, 2017 at 7:56pm:
freediver wrote on Feb 13th, 2017 at 7:42pm:
Are you saying that the only possible explanation for Muhammed murdering 800 people in one day without trial is that they were all treacherous arseholes?


No, are you?  I said that 'I dunno.'

What does your favoured fable say FD?


You did not say you don't know. You were very sure about the treacherous assholes bit. Do you always make up excuses for Islamic genocide at the same time as insisting you do not know if it even happened? How can you be so sure that if Muhammed murdered all those people, then all 800 of them were treacherous assholes?

There is enough there to convince both most Muslims and most historians. You said that if the fable is true, that is how it happened. But the only justification Muhammed needed to slaughter all those people was an angel telling him to. Apparently Muhammed was planning on taking a bath.

All of Gandalf's racist propaganda about mindless collectives, no individuality, personality defined by your tribe, lessons learned from allowing other tribes of Jews to live etc, are all more recent additions by Muslims who have finally realised that the story needs more spin. Chances are some of them are Gandalf's own personal fabrications, before he decided to go with "it's all another Jewish conspiracy."

What do you think of Gandalf's excuses?


Yes, FD, but the question I have is why you have to make stuff up to try to prove this.

Aussie, can you ask FD that?
Back to top
« Last Edit: Feb 14th, 2017 at 4:10pm by Karnal »  
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 38833
Gender: male
Re: Muhammed committed genocide
Reply #52 - Feb 14th, 2017 at 4:17pm
 
freediver wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 3:47pm:
Aussie wrote on Feb 13th, 2017 at 7:56pm:
freediver wrote on Feb 13th, 2017 at 7:42pm:
Are you saying that the only possible explanation for Muhammed murdering 800 people in one day without trial is that they were all treacherous arseholes?


No, are you?  I said that 'I dunno.'

What does your favoured fable say FD?


You did not say you don't know. You were very sure about the treacherous assholes bit. Do you always make up excuses for Islamic genocide at the same time as insisting you do not know if it even happened? How can you be so sure that if Muhammed murdered all those people, then all 800 of them were treacherous assholes?


Why do you consistenty lie about what Members post, freediver.  I said this:

Quote:
If the fable is true, Mo massacred a bunch a treacherous arseholes who happened to be Jewish.  If they had been a bunch a treacherous arseholes who happened to be Methodist, would you have given a stuff?


You then asked:

Quote:
Were all 800 of them treacherous arseholes?


To which I replied:

Quote:
Dunno.  Do you?



Quote:
There is enough there to convince both most Muslims and most historians. You said that if the fable is true, that is how it happened. But the only justification Muhammed needed to slaughter all those people was an angel telling him to. Apparently Muhammed was planning on taking a bath.


Which particular fable?  You are pretty good at creating the modern version.

Quote:
All of Gandalf's racist propaganda about mindless collectives, no individuality, personality defined by your tribe, lessons learned from allowing other tribes of Jews to live etc, are all more recent additions by Muslims who have finally realised that the story needs more spin. Chances are some of them are Gandalf's own personal fabrications, before he decided to go with "it's all another Jewish conspiracy."

What do you think of Gandalf's excuses?


Which ones?  His, or those you reckon are his?

And finally, by popular request ~ "Why you have to make stuff up to try to prove this."


Quote:
You still have not explained how you went from "a national, racial, political, or cultural group" to "every Jew". When you see a Jew, is "Jew" the only group you can imagine them belonging to? Why are you so committed to protecting Muhammed from a charge of genocide that you would deliberately misinterpret your own definition?


You asked about my definition of genocide.  If it was to be a genocide of Jews, it is implicit to my definition that means all the Jews.

Why have you not answered my question about the slaughter of Methodist Lawyers?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Online


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49347
At my desk.
Re: Muhammed committed genocide
Reply #53 - Feb 14th, 2017 at 4:34pm
 
Quote:
If the fable is true, Mo massacred a bunch a treacherous arseholes


This is wht you said Aussie, but there is nothing in the "fable" (ie, the historical account) of all 800 of them being treacherous assholes. You made that up. Prefacing it with "if the fable is true" does not mean you didn't make up the reast, unless you are insisting you are making up a completely new story and talking about that.

Quote:
Which particular fable?  You are pretty good at creating the modern version.


Are you now saying you do not even know what tribe you were talking about when you came out with the "treacherous assholes" bit?

Quote:
You asked about my definition of genocide.  If it was to be a genocide of Jews, it is implicit to my definition that means all the Jews.


No-one said it had to be genocide of all Jews Jews except you. You said that according to your definition of genocide, it had to mean "all Jews". How do you make the giant leap from the definition you presented to "all Jews"?

Quote:
Why have you not answered my question about the slaughter of Methodist Lawyers?


You successfully identified two different groupings there, which is one more than you are prepared to acknowledge in the case of Muhammed's genocide. Why is that? Presumably if we added that they were all black lesbians, you would include those as additional groups they belong to. But not so with Jews - all they are is Jewish, and the only way to commit genocide against people who are Jewish is to slaughter every Jew on earth.

You still have not explained how you went from "a national, racial, political, or cultural group" to "every Jew". When you see a Jew, is "Jew" the only group you can imagine them belonging to? Why are you so committed to protecting Muhammed from a charge of genocide that you would deliberately misinterpret your own definition?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 38833
Gender: male
Re: Muhammed committed genocide
Reply #54 - Feb 14th, 2017 at 4:41pm
 
Quote:
You still have not explained how you went from "a national, racial, political, or cultural group" to "every Jew". When you see a Jew, is "Jew" the only group you can imagine them belonging to? Why are you so committed to protecting Muhammed from a charge of genocide that you would deliberately misinterpret your own definition?


There you go again.  You posted 50% of my definition.  The preceding 50% referred to extermination.  As far as I am concerned the whole of that definition means every Jew not a small group of Jews.  If the fable is true, a small group of treacherous people who happened to be Jews were massacred.

Here's an idea, Effende.  Why don't you tell us your version of this alleged event of 1300/1400 years ago.  Then we might get somewhere.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Online


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49347
At my desk.
Re: Muhammed committed genocide
Reply #55 - Feb 14th, 2017 at 4:44pm
 
Quote:
As far as I am concerned the whole of that definition means every Jew not a small group of Jews.


Why do you need the word extermination to end up with Jew Aussie? It is like you cannot even comprehend the question I am asking you because you cannot comprehend that these people might belong to groups other than "every Jew". Do they all look the same to you or something?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 38833
Gender: male
Re: Muhammed committed genocide
Reply #56 - Feb 14th, 2017 at 4:49pm
 
freediver wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 4:44pm:
Quote:
As far as I am concerned the whole of that definition means every Jew not a small group of Jews.


Why do you need the word extermination to end up with Jew Aussie? It is like you cannot even comprehend the question I am asking you because you cannot comprehend that these people might belong to groups other than "every Jew". Do they all look the same to you or something?


I don't, Effende, and that is precisely why, as far as I am concerned given the definition I have adopted,  Mo did not commit genocide of Jews in that fable.  If the fable is correct, there was no genocide....there was a massacre.

Why is it so important to you to refer to it as genocideMassacre not sexy enough for your agenda?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Online


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49347
At my desk.
Re: Muhammed committed genocide
Reply #57 - Feb 14th, 2017 at 6:08pm
 
Quote:
given the definition I have adopted,  Mo did not commit genocide of Jews in that fable


Did he commit genocide?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 38833
Gender: male
Re: Muhammed committed genocide
Reply #58 - Feb 14th, 2017 at 6:23pm
 
freediver wrote on Feb 14th, 2017 at 6:08pm:
Quote:
given the definition I have adopted,  Mo did not commit genocide of Jews in that fable


Did he commit genocide?


Taking ~ Effende ~ how I interpret that definition I have adopted ~ no, for zillionth time.  If the fable is true,  it was a massacre of a mob, who incidentally were Jewish, who allegedly did the dirty on a pissed off Mo.  Not unusual I would guess at the time, Effende.

What would you have done if you were Mo in that perhaps pretend position, Effende?

According to another fable, God is responsible for the drowning deaths of many Egyptians.  Was that genocide, and were all whom he drowned murderous arseholes?  I also seem to have a dim recollection of another fable in which, it is said, that God sent down some evil force to some place, and said evil force murdered innocent kids.  You heard that one, Effende?

I don't believe one word of it.  Do you?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Online


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49347
At my desk.
Re: Muhammed committed genocide
Reply #59 - Feb 14th, 2017 at 6:37pm
 
I will try to dumb it down even more for you Aussie.

1)

You made a leap from your definition:

extermination of a national, racial, political, or cultural group

to:

extermination of every Jew

Obviously the extermination bit is irrelevant here. You did in fact make a leap from "a national, racial, political, or cultural group" to "every Jew". Why did you do this, and why did you have such incredible difficulty understanding such a simple question?

2)

You also stated:

Quote:
If the fable is true, Mo massacred a bunch a treacherous arseholes


even though there is nothing in the original fable to suggest that they were all treacherous assholes. So why did you make this leap? Your only answer so far has been to try to slither away from this by pretending you do not even know which fable we are talking about, which leads to the obvious question, why would you make such statements about a fable if you did not even know what you were talking about?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 9
Send Topic Print