freediver wrote on Feb 14
th, 2017 at 3:47pm:
Aussie wrote on Feb 13
th, 2017 at 7:56pm:
freediver wrote on Feb 13
th, 2017 at 7:42pm:
Are you saying that the only possible explanation for Muhammed murdering 800 people in one day without trial is that they were all treacherous arseholes?
No, are you? I said that 'I dunno.'
What does your favoured fable say FD?
You did not say you don't know. You were very sure about the treacherous assholes bit. Do you always make up excuses for Islamic genocide at the same time as insisting you do not know if it even happened? How can you be so sure that if Muhammed murdered all those people, then all 800 of them were treacherous assholes?
Why do you consistenty lie about what Members post, freediver. I said this:
Quote:If the fable is true, Mo massacred a bunch a treacherous arseholes who happened to be Jewish. If they had been a bunch a treacherous arseholes who happened to be Methodist, would you have given a stuff?
You then asked:
Quote:Were all 800 of them treacherous arseholes?
To which I replied:
Quote:Dunno. Do you?
Quote:There is enough there to convince both most Muslims and most historians. You said that if the fable is true, that is how it happened. But the only justification Muhammed needed to slaughter all those people was an angel telling him to. Apparently Muhammed was planning on taking a bath.
Which particular fable? You are pretty good at creating the modern version.
Quote:All of Gandalf's racist propaganda about mindless collectives, no individuality, personality defined by your tribe, lessons learned from allowing other tribes of Jews to live etc, are all more recent additions by Muslims who have finally realised that the story needs more spin. Chances are some of them are Gandalf's own personal fabrications, before he decided to go with "it's all another Jewish conspiracy."
What do you think of Gandalf's excuses?
Which ones? His, or those
you reckon are his?
And finally, by popular request ~ "Why you have to make stuff up to try to prove this."
Quote:You still have not explained how you went from "a national, racial, political, or cultural group" to "every Jew". When you see a Jew, is "Jew" the only group you can imagine them belonging to? Why are you so committed to protecting Muhammed from a charge of genocide that you would deliberately misinterpret your own definition?
You asked about my definition of genocide. If it was to be a genocide of Jews, it is implicit to my definition that means
all the Jews.
Why have you not answered my question about the slaughter of Methodist Lawyers?