Australian Politics Forum - Senator Lambie on sharia

rhino

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17179
Gender: male

Re: Senator Lambie on sharia
Reply #60 - Feb 14^th, 2017 at 2:37pm

John Smith wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 2:22pm:

rhino wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 2:06pm:

John Smith wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 2:03pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 1:58pm:

John Smith wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 1:55pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 1:53pm:

John Smith wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 1:44pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 1:40pm:

Cheers Grendel.

http://rs199.pbsrc.com/albums/aa279/LolaBonne/Forum%20Pics/Anotherwankfest.jpg

No answer it seems. Roll Eyes

did you ask a question?

I'll repeat myself dumbass. How are people meant to understand Sharia Law when it is has various interpretations?

how do people understand the bible when it has various interpretations?

The Bible is in writing with agreed interpretations, Sharia law is not.

ohh, so the roman catholic agree with the church of England, who in turn agrees with the Russian orthodox, whoi agree with the Greek Orthodox, who agree with the joho's, who agree with all the other 'christian' faiths?

get real.

No the point though, there are agreed interpretations of the Bible, the King James version being one. There are no agreed interpretations of sharia law.

Back to top

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 75080
Gender: male

Re: Senator Lambie on sharia
Reply #61 - Feb 14^th, 2017 at 2:41pm

rhino wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 2:37pm:

No the point though, there are agreed interpretations of the Bible,

as there are agreed interpretations on sharia ... all the extremists agree on their version, the moderates on theirs, and others still might believe in another version altogether.

Not that I believe in any of them anyway, but the one thing I definitely don't believe is some Islamphobes version of Sharia.

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

polite_gandalf

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male

Re: Senator Lambie on sharia
Reply #62 - Feb 14^th, 2017 at 2:53pm

Grendel wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 1:32pm:

I was giving you the opportunity to explain yourself and Sharia... you refused. Not to worry I've started doing it for you. Are you sure you are not bwian????? [/color] Cheesy

Do you have reading comprehension problems?

I explained myself perfectly, and I'll explain again just for you: those "laws" you list are not, in my opinion, part of sharia. To me, Sharia is only personal acts of worship that don't affect anyone else: praying, fasting, giving charity, belief in one God etc. That, in case you are still confused is "explaining myself and Sharia".

If you were after something else, I suggest you learn how to compose the right question in coherent English.

Back to top

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:

Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.

IP Logged

Grendel

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male

Re: Senator Lambie on sharia
Reply #63 - Feb 14^th, 2017 at 3:00pm

polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 2:53pm:

Grendel wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 1:32pm:

I was giving you the opportunity to explain yourself and Sharia... you refused. Not to worry I've started doing it for you. Are you sure you are not bwian????? [/color] Cheesy

Do you have reading comprehension problems?

I explained myself perfectly, and I'll explain again just for you: those "laws" you list are not, in my opinion, part of sharia. To me, Sharia is only personal acts of worship that don't affect anyone else: praying, fasting, giving charity, belief in one God etc. That, in case you are still confused is "explaining myself and Sharia".

If you were after something else, I suggest you learn how to compose the right question in coherent English.

Are YOU sure YOU are not BWIAN?
BTW if you have bothered to read what I posted/wrote... YOU are the one with ENGLISH COMPREHENSION PROBLEMS. Cheesy

I have no problems with HALAL except where the money goes, I have no real issues with SHARIA except the more stupid laws and punishments that belong no where sane people live.

Back to top

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 96417

Re: Senator Lambie on sharia
Reply #64 - Feb 14^th, 2017 at 3:04pm

rhino wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 2:37pm:

John Smith wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 2:22pm:

rhino wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 2:06pm:

John Smith wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 2:03pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 1:58pm:

John Smith wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 1:55pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 1:53pm:

John Smith wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 1:44pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 1:40pm:

Cheers Grendel.

http://rs199.pbsrc.com/albums/aa279/LolaBonne/Forum%20Pics/Anotherwankfest.jpg

No answer it seems. Roll Eyes

did you ask a question?

I'll repeat myself dumbass. How are people meant to understand Sharia Law when it is has various interpretations?

how do people understand the bible when it has various interpretations?

The Bible is in writing with agreed interpretations, Sharia law is not.

ohh, so the roman catholic agree with the church of England, who in turn agrees with the Russian orthodox, whoi agree with the Greek Orthodox, who agree with the joho's, who agree with all the other 'christian' faiths?

get real.

No the point though, there are agreed interpretations of the Bible, the King James version being one. There are no agreed interpretations of sharia law.

The King James Bible is a translation, Rhino, not an interpretation.

Sharia law is all interpretation. It's based on Muhammed's teachings and other Sharia rulings. It often calls to question other Sharia rulings.

Back to top

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 96417

Re: Senator Lambie on sharia
Reply #65 - Feb 14^th, 2017 at 3:05pm

Grendel wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 3:00pm:

polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 2:53pm:

Grendel wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 1:32pm:

I was giving you the opportunity to explain yourself and Sharia... you refused. Not to worry I've started doing it for you. Are you sure you are not bwian????? [/color] Cheesy

Do you have reading comprehension problems?

I explained myself perfectly, and I'll explain again just for you: those "laws" you list are not, in my opinion, part of sharia. To me, Sharia is only personal acts of worship that don't affect anyone else: praying, fasting, giving charity, belief in one God etc. That, in case you are still confused is "explaining myself and Sharia".

If you were after something else, I suggest you learn how to compose the right question in coherent English.

Are YOU sure YOU are not BWIAN?

Is this the right question, G?

Back to top

IP Logged

rhino

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17179
Gender: male

Re: Senator Lambie on sharia
Reply #66 - Feb 14^th, 2017 at 3:09pm

Karnal wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 3:04pm:

rhino wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 2:37pm:

John Smith wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 2:22pm:

rhino wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 2:06pm:

John Smith wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 2:03pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 1:58pm:

John Smith wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 1:55pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 1:53pm:

John Smith wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 1:44pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 1:40pm:

Cheers Grendel.

http://rs199.pbsrc.com/albums/aa279/LolaBonne/Forum%20Pics/Anotherwankfest.jpg

No answer it seems. Roll Eyes

did you ask a question?

I'll repeat myself dumbass. How are people meant to understand Sharia Law when it is has various interpretations?

how do people understand the bible when it has various interpretations?

The Bible is in writing with agreed interpretations, Sharia law is not.

ohh, so the roman catholic agree with the church of England, who in turn agrees with the Russian orthodox, whoi agree with the Greek Orthodox, who agree with the joho's, who agree with all the other 'christian' faiths?

get real.

No the point though, there are agreed interpretations of the Bible, the King James version being one. There are no agreed interpretations of sharia law.

The King James Bible is a translation, Rhino, not an interpretation.

Incorrect. It is an interpretation.

Quote:

Sharia law is all interpretation. It's based on Muhammed's teachings and other Sharia rulings. It often calls to question other Sharia rulings.

Incorrect again, Sharia law is simply customary law which obviously varies from region to region, even between villages in the same region.

Back to top

IP Logged

Grendel

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male

Re: Senator Lambie on sharia
Reply #67 - Feb 14^th, 2017 at 3:45pm

polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 2:53pm:

Grendel wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 1:32pm:

I was giving you the opportunity to explain yourself and Sharia... you refused. Not to worry I've started doing it for you. Are you sure you are not bwian????? [/color] Cheesy

Do you have reading comprehension problems?

I explained myself perfectly, and I'll explain again just for you: those "laws" you list are not, in my opinion, part of sharia. To me, Sharia is only personal acts of worship that don't affect anyone else: praying, fasting, giving charity, belief in one God etc. That, in case you are still confused is "explaining myself and Sharia".

If you were after something else, I suggest you learn how to compose the right question in coherent English.

Good grief bwian.... you need to explain your pov in general, you need to explain Sharia to those who don't understand it. I merely gave you the opportunity... you don't need to explain it to me. I already get it.
You need to be a realist though and not an apologist... you need admit there are problems with it in the non-muslim societies muslims choose to reside in.

Feel free to point out anywhere I've got it wrong. Just don't start posting any more yawns. Oh and don't flame me... or I will flame back. Wink

Back to top

IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Online

Representative of me

Posts: 42308

Re: Senator Lambie on sharia
Reply #68 - Feb 14^th, 2017 at 7:15pm

... wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 9:10am:

polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 8:32am:

Its pretty obvious Jacqui has not made any efforts since then to better understand the Sharia and that there is no one simplistic definition of it.

Yeah well its also pretty obvious that progressives haven't made any efforts to better understand the opinions of their "conservative" compatriots either. Not surprising, considering they shut down every forum where they could potentially hear what those opinions are.

And so here we are, the channels of dialogue broken down, progressives unwilling to compromise on pushing through their year zero agenda, and conservatives fed up with conceding point after point after point.

Maybe more propaganda is what's needed to fix this potentially explosive state of affairs.

What I find interesting is how conservatives claim victimhood over the presence of Muslims within their society, while still outnumbering them one thousand to one. They claim they are not allowed to express their opinions when in reality they doing exactly that, even when their opinions are offensive and of course, persecution of innocents because they look different/worship differently/love people differently to them. Roll Eyes

Back to top

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Online

Representative of me

Posts: 42308

Re: Senator Lambie on sharia
Reply #69 - Feb 14^th, 2017 at 7:16pm

Grendel wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 3:45pm:

polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 2:53pm:

Grendel wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 1:32pm:

I was giving you the opportunity to explain yourself and Sharia... you refused. Not to worry I've started doing it for you. Are you sure you are not bwian????? [/color] Cheesy

Do you have reading comprehension problems?

I explained myself perfectly, and I'll explain again just for you: those "laws" you list are not, in my opinion, part of sharia. To me, Sharia is only personal acts of worship that don't affect anyone else: praying, fasting, giving charity, belief in one God etc. That, in case you are still confused is "explaining myself and Sharia".

If you were after something else, I suggest you learn how to compose the right question in coherent English.

Good grief bwian.... you need to explain your pov in general, you need to explain Sharia to those who don't understand it. I merely gave you the opportunity... you don't need to explain it to me. I already get it.
You need to be a realist though and not an apologist... you need admit there are problems with it in the non-muslim societies muslims choose to reside in.

Feel free to point out anywhere I've got it wrong. Just don't start posting any more yawns. Oh and don't flame me... or I will flame back. Wink

Methinks you have the wrong attribution for your opinions, Geoff... Roll Eyes

Back to top

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

Grendel Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 28080 Gender:	Re: Senator Lambie on sharia Reply #70 - Feb 14^th, 2017 at 8:51pm You are welcome to make a constructive comment bwian.... something you may have forgotten how to do. I was making a point to Gandalf... which looks to have gone whoosh right over your head. how ususual
Back to top	IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Online

Representative of me

Posts: 42308

Re: Senator Lambie on sharia
Reply #71 - Feb 14^th, 2017 at 10:50pm

Grendel wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 8:51pm:

You are welcome to make a constructive comment bwian.... something you may have forgotten how to do.

I was making a point to Gandalf... which looks to have gone whoosh right over your head.
how ususual Grin

*SIGH*, as usual, you have failed to retract your comment. I am not Gandalf and Gandalf is not me. Clear? I am myself and me alone. Now, please correct your posts or I will be forced to complain. Tsk, tsk. Roll Eyes

Back to top

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

Grendel

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male

Re: Senator Lambie on sharia
Reply #72 - Feb 15^th, 2017 at 9:01am

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 10:50pm:

Grendel wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 8:51pm:

You are welcome to make a constructive comment bwian.... something you may have forgotten how to do.

I was making a point to Gandalf... which looks to have gone whoosh right over your head.
how ususual Grin

*SIGH*, as usual, you have failed to retract your comment. I am not Gandalf and Gandalf is not me. Clear? I am myself and me alone. Now, please correct your posts or I will be forced to complain. Tsk, tsk. Roll Eyes

WHOOSH!!!

You are 1 thing bwian... an idiot.

Back to top

IP Logged

Sprintcyclist

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 40769
Gender: male

Re: Senator Lambie on sharia
Reply #73 - Feb 15^th, 2017 at 7:38pm

bogarde73 wrote on Feb 14^th, 2017 at 6:56am:

I might have to revise my opinion of this woman, whom I admit to previously regarding as a bit of a yobbo.

As reported in ABC News, she apparently took apart some Islamic woman supporter of sharia law on the Q&A program.
There is only one law for everybody here she yelled at her and that isn't sharia law. So the report says, she received huge applause for her stand.
Well done senator.

She further said she supported the Trump measure to ban immigration from specified countries and wanted a similar measure here.

Amen to that.

Jacqui is very good.

She sees islam as the cult it is.

Back to top

Modern Classic Right Wing

IP Logged

Brian Ross Gold Member Online Representative of me Posts: 42308	Re: Senator Lambie on sharia Reply #74 - Feb 15^th, 2017 at 7:46pm Sprintcyclist wrote on Feb 15^th, 2017 at 7:38pm: Jacqui is very good. She sees islam as the [a] cult it is. Pity she and you are incorrect...
Back to top	Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... IP Logged