Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
Rush Limbaugh (Read 820 times)
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 139586
Gender: male
Re: Rush Limbaugh
Reply #15 - Feb 18th, 2025 at 7:03pm
 
Dnarever wrote on Feb 18th, 2025 at 7:01pm:
What a waste of space he was. Early propagandist for the mean and nasty right.


Thankfully he's not stealing our oxygen any more.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 48077
Gender: male
Re: Rush Limbaugh
Reply #16 - Feb 18th, 2025 at 7:05pm
 
Dnarever wrote on Feb 18th, 2025 at 7:01pm:
What a waste of space he was. Early propagandist for the mean and nasty right.



I bet you have never actually listened to him, stupid fowl.

You are gobbling up the Granuiad and ABC bollocks totally uncritically, like the waddling, shitting ditz you are.

Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 59347
Here
Gender: male
Re: Rush Limbaugh
Reply #17 - Feb 18th, 2025 at 7:06pm
 
Karnal wrote on Feb 15th, 2017 at 10:24am:
What does Rush mean by this, Bogie?

Quote:
There will be more ICE raids this afternoon to make people forget about this.


I'm curious.


I don't think he means anything he has been dead since 2021. He had little meaning before 2021 but none at all since.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 59347
Here
Gender: male
Re: Rush Limbaugh
Reply #18 - Feb 18th, 2025 at 7:08pm
 
Frank wrote on Feb 18th, 2025 at 7:05pm:
Dnarever wrote on Feb 18th, 2025 at 7:01pm:
What a waste of space he was. Early propagandist for the mean and nasty right.



I bet you have never actually listened to him, stupid fowl.

You are gobbling up the Granuiad and ABC bollocks totally uncritically, like the waddling, shitting ditz you are.



I feel so much better since I stopped reading your dribble but for a little bet I reckon that you tried to insult me?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 139586
Gender: male
Re: Rush Limbaugh
Reply #19 - Feb 18th, 2025 at 7:08pm
 

No need to listen to the silly old bastard.

This tells you all you need to know:

Of Limbaugh's controversial statements and allegations they have investigated, Politifact has rated 84% as ranging from "Mostly False" to "Pants On Fire" (signifying false statements that cannot be reasonably assessed as merely errors), with 5% of Limbaugh's contested statements rising to the level of "Mostly True" and 0% rated "True".

These debunked allegations by Limbaugh include suggestions that the existence of gorillas disproves the theory of evolution, that Ted Kennedy sent a letter to Soviet General Secretary Yuri Andropov seeking to undercut President Reagan, that a recent lack of hurricanes disproves climate change, and that President Obama wanted to mandate circumcision.


He was just another right-wing lunatic peddling bullshit.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 48077
Gender: male
Re: Rush Limbaugh
Reply #20 - Feb 18th, 2025 at 7:09pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 18th, 2025 at 7:03pm:
Dnarever wrote on Feb 18th, 2025 at 7:01pm:
What a waste of space he was. Early propagandist for the mean and nasty right.


Thankfully he's not stealing our oxygen any more.


You despicable creeps cannot tolerate ANY diversity of views. Your immediate reaction to ANY different - DIVERSE! - view is to label it unacceptabke. That way you dont have to actually think, thinking being the crucifix, sunlight and garlick to you weirdo zombie cockroaches.

Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 139586
Gender: male
Re: Rush Limbaugh
Reply #21 - Feb 18th, 2025 at 7:14pm
 
Frank wrote on Feb 18th, 2025 at 7:09pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 18th, 2025 at 7:03pm:
Dnarever wrote on Feb 18th, 2025 at 7:01pm:
What a waste of space he was. Early propagandist for the mean and nasty right.


Thankfully he's not stealing our oxygen any more.


You despicable creeps cannot tolerate ANY diversity of views. Your immediate reaction to ANY different - DIVERSE! - view is to label it unacceptabke. That way you dont have to actually think, thinking being the crucifix, sunlight and garlick to you weirdo zombie cockroaches.



Not diversity - bullshit.

Of Limbaugh's controversial statements and allegations they have investigated, Politifact has rated 84% as ranging from "Mostly False" to "Pants On Fire" (signifying false statements that cannot be reasonably assessed as merely errors), with 5% of Limbaugh's contested statements rising to the level of "Mostly True" and 0% rated "True".

These debunked allegations by Limbaugh include suggestions that the existence of gorillas disproves the theory of evolution, that Ted Kennedy sent a letter to Soviet General Secretary Yuri Andropov seeking to undercut President Reagan, that a recent lack of hurricanes disproves climate change, and that President Obama wanted to mandate circumcision.


Why would anyone listen to someone so full of
sh
it?

Different views are fine - lies and conspiracy theories are not.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 59347
Here
Gender: male
Re: Rush Limbaugh
Reply #22 - Feb 18th, 2025 at 7:25pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 18th, 2025 at 7:03pm:
Dnarever wrote on Feb 18th, 2025 at 7:01pm:
What a waste of space he was. Early propagandist for the mean and nasty right.


Thankfully he's not stealing our oxygen any more.



Not sure that his species has any use for that particular gas.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 59347
Here
Gender: male
Re: Rush Limbaugh
Reply #23 - Feb 18th, 2025 at 7:35pm
 
Rush is the start of the reason that so many on the right are completely brain dead.

Rush Lumbar (90's) Bill O'reilly (1996) Hannity (2000's) Carlson (2010's)

Many on the right have been subjected to the continuous stream of mind numbing biased dishonest rhetoric slammed down their throat for about 4 decades now - just on FOX propaganda or Fox Lies alone.

No wonder that so many of them are now non compos mentis.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 42463
Re: Rush Limbaugh
Reply #24 - Feb 18th, 2025 at 8:09pm
 
Frank wrote on Feb 18th, 2025 at 7:09pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 18th, 2025 at 7:03pm:
Dnarever wrote on Feb 18th, 2025 at 7:01pm:
What a waste of space he was. Early propagandist for the mean and nasty right.


Thankfully he's not stealing our oxygen any more.


You despicable creeps cannot tolerate ANY diversity of views. Your immediate reaction to ANY different - DIVERSE! - view is to label it unacceptabke. That way you dont have to actually think, thinking being the crucifix, sunlight and garlick to you weirdo zombie cockroaches.


You describe yourself to a "T", Soren.  What a WOFTAM you are.  A complete and utter WOFTAM.  I've never seen you concede a single point in any argument.  To you, it is all Racism/Culturalism/Xenophobia/Isolationalism/etc.  Tsk, tsk, tsk...  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 48077
Gender: male
Re: Rush Limbaugh
Reply #25 - Feb 18th, 2025 at 8:10pm
 
Dnarever wrote on Feb 18th, 2025 at 7:35pm:
Rush is the start of the reason that so many on the right are completely brain dead.

Rush Lumbar (90's) Bill O'reilly (1996) Hannity (2000's) Carlson (2010's)

Many on the right have been subjected to the continuous stream of mind numbing biased dishonest rhetoric slammed down their throat for about 4 decades now - just on FOX propaganda or Fox Lies alone.

No wonder that so many of them are now non compos mentis.

You are waddling, mindless duck.

You are not in a position to make a reliable judgement on things not concerning peas.


Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 48077
Gender: male
Re: Rush Limbaugh
Reply #26 - Feb 18th, 2025 at 8:11pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on Feb 18th, 2025 at 8:09pm:
Frank wrote on Feb 18th, 2025 at 7:09pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 18th, 2025 at 7:03pm:
Dnarever wrote on Feb 18th, 2025 at 7:01pm:
What a waste of space he was. Early propagandist for the mean and nasty right.


Thankfully he's not stealing our oxygen any more.


You despicable creeps cannot tolerate ANY diversity of views. Your immediate reaction to ANY different - DIVERSE! - view is to label it unacceptabke. That way you dont have to actually think, thinking being the crucifix, sunlight and garlick to you weirdo zombie cockroaches.


You describe yourself to a "T", Soren.  What a WOFTAM you are.  A complete and utter WOFTAM.  I've never seen you concede a single point in any argument.  To you, it is all Racism/Culturalism/Xenophobia/Isolationalism/etc.  Tsk, tsk, tsk...  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

Bollocks.

Lying bollocks.

Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 48077
Gender: male
Re: Rush Limbaugh
Reply #27 - Feb 18th, 2025 at 8:22pm
 
Frank wrote on Feb 18th, 2025 at 6:49pm:
Four years ago today, just about this time, I was pottering about getting ready to guest-host The Rush Limbaugh Show when the telephone rang. It was Kraig Kitchin, his longtime friend (and head of the network that distributed his show), calling to break the news that Rush had died earlier that morning.

Post-Limbaugh talk radio seems smaller to me than it once did - not just because Rush had a big personality, but because he managed to fit the flotsam and jetsam of the news cycle into the big picture. Whatever topic he'd alight on, he would enlarge, and connect to the great coursing currents of the age. He was also incredibly, naturally funny. I have nothing against any of his successors up and down the dial, but, on the rare occasions I switch on the radio in his time-slot, it's not the same.

Two years ago, the anniversary of Rush's death fell on the day of our weekly Clubland Q&A. It wasn't intended to be a one-hour remembrance of America's anchorman, but, because listeners had so many questions about him and his show, it somehow turned into one. Listening to it later, I thought it was worth a re-broadcast - not just for the questions and answers, but for other aspects, too: a musical selection courtesy of his beloved Kathryn, a brief evocation of my guest-hosting days, and the last words Rush ever spoke on air.

Click above to listen.

As you can hear toward the end, I was still recuperating from my (first two) heart attacks. Nothing like a spot of ill health to prompt intimations of mortality. We all deal with it in our own way, as I reflect re Rush in the course of the show. A year ago, in the witness box of the DC Superior Court, I was asked by Michael E Mann's lead counsel John Williams whether it was not the case that I was a guest-host of The Rush Limbaugh Show. I said I was.

A lot of trial observers seem to think that was the moment when the DC lefties on the jury determined to convict me, of whatever they could. Some of those close to hand suggested that I should have finessed the question: "Oh, I may have guest-hosted that show a couple of times over the years ...long time ago ...can't really recall all the shows I've guest-hosted ...Anne Robinson on the Beeb, all kinds of things..."

Instead, as Steve from Manhattan, who was present in the courtroom, reminded me:

Mark, I remember that, when John Williams asked you if you had guest-hosted for Rush, your response was: 'Till his dying day.' As with all of your testimony: well said.

As I say, intimations of mortality: If I'm going down, I'd rather go down as who I am than try to thread a needle of lies. Rush was profoundly decent to me - especially when it mattered. He was very decent to untold legions of people, and certainly a much better man than the revenge-obsessed misogynist psycho sitting across the courtroom from me. So please click away and enjoy the show.

https://www.steynonline.com/15044/rush-four-years-on]



Worth listening to, as always


https://www.steynonline.com/15044/rush-four-years-on

Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 59347
Here
Gender: male
Re: Rush Limbaugh
Reply #28 - Feb 18th, 2025 at 8:27pm
 
Frank wrote on Feb 18th, 2025 at 8:10pm:
Dnarever wrote on Feb 18th, 2025 at 7:35pm:
Rush is the start of the reason that so many on the right are completely brain dead.

Rush Lumbar (90's) Bill O'reilly (1996) Hannity (2000's) Carlson (2010's)

Many on the right have been subjected to the continuous stream of mind numbing biased dishonest rhetoric slammed down their throat for about 4 decades now - just on FOX propaganda or Fox Lies alone.

No wonder that so many of them are now non compos mentis.

You are waddling, mindless duck.

You are not in a position to make a reliable judgement on things not concerning peas.




so many of them are now non compos mentis.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 96625
Re: Rush Limbaugh
Reply #29 - Feb 19th, 2025 at 12:00am
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 18th, 2025 at 7:08pm:
No need to listen to the silly old bastard.

This tells you all you need to know:

Of Limbaugh's controversial statements and allegations they have investigated, Politifact has rated 84% as ranging from "Mostly False" to "Pants On Fire" (signifying false statements that cannot be reasonably assessed as merely errors), with 5% of Limbaugh's contested statements rising to the level of "Mostly True" and 0% rated "True".

These debunked allegations by Limbaugh include suggestions that the existence of gorillas disproves the theory of evolution, that Ted Kennedy sent a letter to Soviet General Secretary Yuri Andropov seeking to undercut President Reagan, that a recent lack of hurricanes disproves climate change, and that President Obama wanted to mandate circumcision.


He was just another right-wing lunatic peddling bullshit.



I know, right? And those were the good old days, back when the lies were a bit of fun.

For Rush Limbaugh, eating the cats and dogs would have been so oh-not-satire.

Today, it's known as truth.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print