Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 
Send Topic Print
DFAT funding Islamic propaganda (Read 19869 times)
Grendel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male
Re: DFAT funding Islamic propaganda
Reply #120 - Feb 19th, 2017 at 9:34am
 
Love the way they address issues they can spin and avoid the more meaningful factual issues.

Is That Taqqiya Gandalf, oh and anytime you feel up to answering the many questions I've posted and you've ignored I'm ready to hear your opinions.

Please don't disappoint like bwian does so very often by running away. Roll Eyes
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
BigOl64
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 14438
Townsville QLD
Gender: male
Re: DFAT funding Islamic propaganda
Reply #121 - Feb 19th, 2017 at 9:49am
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 19th, 2017 at 8:41am:
freediver wrote on Feb 18th, 2017 at 7:26pm:
polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 18th, 2017 at 11:45am:
Do you reckon there might be sound economic reasons to promote Australia to the Middle East that DFAT (you know the guys who are actually responsible for overseas trade and stuff like that) are aware of?


Not really thinking this through are you FD?

Do you see any business logic in Australia sending over high profile ambassadors to promote Australia as a stable, tolerant, multicultural country? Do you think this might help promote Australia as a good place to do business in?

Or do you think oil company execs would do a better job of that?



Do you think we want to do business with countries like saudi arabia, jordan, sudan, syria, afghanistan?


Unlike this woman we should never validate their treatment of their women for a few fkken shekels. We are better than them and we should never sell our reputation si cheaply.


Have them be a lot less muslim and then we might engage at a business level.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: DFAT funding Islamic propaganda
Reply #122 - Feb 19th, 2017 at 9:52am
 
BigOl64 wrote on Feb 19th, 2017 at 9:49am:
polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 19th, 2017 at 8:41am:
freediver wrote on Feb 18th, 2017 at 7:26pm:
polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 18th, 2017 at 11:45am:
Do you reckon there might be sound economic reasons to promote Australia to the Middle East that DFAT (you know the guys who are actually responsible for overseas trade and stuff like that) are aware of?


Not really thinking this through are you FD?

Do you see any business logic in Australia sending over high profile ambassadors to promote Australia as a stable, tolerant, multicultural country? Do you think this might help promote Australia as a good place to do business in?

Or do you think oil company execs would do a better job of that?



Do you think we want to do business with countries like saudi arabia, jordan, sudan, syria, afghanistan?


Unlike this woman we should never validate their treatment of their women for a few fkken shekels. We are better than them and we should never sell our reputation si cheaply.


Have them be a lot less muslim and then we might engage at a business level.



She didn't go to most of those countries Big Ol- lets stick to the facts eh?

And yes, I think we do want to do business with rich countries like Saudi Arabia, EAU, Kuwait.
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
BigOl64
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 14438
Townsville QLD
Gender: male
Re: DFAT funding Islamic propaganda
Reply #123 - Feb 19th, 2017 at 10:53am
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 19th, 2017 at 9:52am:
BigOl64 wrote on Feb 19th, 2017 at 9:49am:
polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 19th, 2017 at 8:41am:
freediver wrote on Feb 18th, 2017 at 7:26pm:
polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 18th, 2017 at 11:45am:
Do you reckon there might be sound economic reasons to promote Australia to the Middle East that DFAT (you know the guys who are actually responsible for overseas trade and stuff like that) are aware of?


Not really thinking this through are you FD?

Do you see any business logic in Australia sending over high profile ambassadors to promote Australia as a stable, tolerant, multicultural country? Do you think this might help promote Australia as a good place to do business in?

Or do you think oil company execs would do a better job of that?



Do you think we want to do business with countries like saudi arabia, jordan, sudan, syria, afghanistan?


Unlike this woman we should never validate their treatment of their women for a few fkken shekels. We are better than them and we should never sell our reputation si cheaply.


Have them be a lot less muslim and then we might engage at a business level.



She didn't go to most of those countries Big Ol- lets stick to the facts eh?

And yes, I think we do want to do business with rich countries like Saudi Arabia, EAU, Kuwait.



I don't see why she shouldn't, they mistreat their women horribly and they are muslims, they meet the criteria.

You may be okay with selling our souls to the devil in doing business with countries like saudi arabia, but some of us are not. Accepting that their horrendous behaviour towards women is not bad enough to do something about, is not what I want Australia to be.


We stop trade with countries when they mistreat our cattle and sheep, why should we trade with countries that mistreat their humans?

Back to top
« Last Edit: Feb 19th, 2017 at 1:33pm by BigOl64 »  
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49371
At my desk.
Re: DFAT funding Islamic propaganda
Reply #124 - Feb 19th, 2017 at 12:55pm
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 19th, 2017 at 9:14am:
freediver wrote on Feb 19th, 2017 at 8:50am:
I would expect DFAT to be a little more focussed on direct support rather than image management among people highly unlikely to make investment decisions. You could justify just about any form of waste otherwise. This is exactly the sort of idiocy bureaucrats should get fired for.


But FD you are not merely lamenting the waste of money by DFAT bureaucrats. You bring in baseless claims of them colluding in the spread of Islamic propaganda (whatever that means) - and worst of all, dishonestly linking this to a completely unrelated comments she made on Q&A - which you may or may not think she was paid by DFAT to say (you are deliberately being cryptic about this).

What this comes down to is outrage for the sake of outrage because it happens to be all about a confident, liberated, successful muslim woman who wears a hijab. There is literally no other logical explanation for why you would link the two completely unrelated events and misleadingly imply they are related.


Whether you like it or not, they funded Islamic propaganda. There is no need to use words like collude or conspiracy. They made no attempt to hide the arrangement until people pointed out what a stupid idea it is.

Quote:
And yes, I think we do want to do business with rich countries like Saudi Arabia, EAU, Kuwait.


How much business do you think we do with the women in these countries?

And how good do you think it will be for our image among Saudi businessmen to be seen as promoting liberal views among Muslim women?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Grendel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male
Re: DFAT funding Islamic propaganda
Reply #125 - Feb 19th, 2017 at 12:57pm
 
I wonder if they've funded any other young non-muslim authors to world tours of non-islamic nations?

If not...  why not?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Grendel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male
Re: DFAT funding Islamic propaganda
Reply #126 - Feb 20th, 2017 at 9:58am
 
Good grief....  now she's really lost the plot.

Quote:
Feminist activist Yassmin Abdel-Magied sought advice from Hizb ut-Tahrir
The Australian
12:00AM February 20, 2017
Rick Morton

The activist who proclaimed Islam was “the most feminist religion” reached out to the spokesman for anti-gay and anti-women group Hizb ut-Tahrir in the wake of her fight on ABC TV’s program Q&A for advice on how she could have framed her argu­ment better.

Hizb ut-Tahrir spokes­man Wassim Doureihi posted on his personal Facebook page that Muslims were more angry with independent senator Jacqui Lambie, who wants to ban the burka, instead of two other government MPs who “belong to parties that have bombed Muslims abroad, criminalised Muslims at home, and jailed Muslims seeking refuge from both”.

Mr Doureihi and others criti­cised Yassmin Abdel-Magied for argu­ing through a “secular lens” and not having the required deep knowledge of Islam to prosecute her case.

“Salams! Well, I am always happy to take feedback,” Ms Abdel-Magied wrote in response.

“What specifically was problematic and how can I do better in the future inshallah? I am young, and willing to learn, inshallah. Trying to do the best with the platform I can, Allah willing.”

Mr Doureihi famously refused to condemn Islamic State for indiscrimin­ate acts of violence, includ­ing against Muslims, and declined to use his platform to implor­e young Muslim men in particular from joining the terrorist group.

He said the West only wanted to use Islamic State as a “bogeyman” to condemn an entire religion.

After Mr Doureihi told Ms Abdel-Magied she “ended up framing Islam through a secular lens, aimed at a secular people and conscious of the presence of a secular government”, the author and activist said: “Ah indeed. Sigh. This is always a tricky one. Will DM (private message) you.”

Another spokesman for the group, Uthman Badar, had a talk at Sydney’s Festival of Dangerous Ideas cancelled in 2014 after a backlash against the topic
“Honour killings are morally justified”.


Mr Badar did not choose the topic, although he did consent to it, and later argued he was not going to defend the practice.

In February 2014, he defend­ed the forced marriage of a girl, age 12, to a Muslim man aged 26.

“Something being illegal ­according to Western law does not make it immoral,” he said in a press release.

Hizb ut-Tahrir was taken to the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal after a 2014 lecture in which women were told to sit at the back while men had seats reserved in the front. The tribunal found Alison Bevage, a reporter, had been discriminated against based on her sex.

After Malcolm Turnbull hosted an Iftar dinner with anti-gay cleric Sheik Shady Alsuleiman last year, the Prime Minister condemned the preacher’s views on homosexuality, which in turn prompted a response from Mr Badar.

He said on Facebook that Mr Turnbull was condemning the “normative Islam­­­ic position on homosex­uality”.

Ms Abdel-Magied said yesterday that she had “not seen anything­ by HT (Hizb ut-Tahrir)” but did not respond when asked about her communications with Mr Doureihi. Mr Doureihi saw questions put to him by The Australian but did not respond.


She knows nothing of Hizb ut-Tahrir?  Really.  I'm not Muslim yet I do.  Just how ignorant are these people about what is going on around them? Cheesy
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
BigOl64
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 14438
Townsville QLD
Gender: male
Re: DFAT funding Islamic propaganda
Reply #127 - Feb 20th, 2017 at 10:06am
 
Grendel wrote on Feb 20th, 2017 at 9:58am:
Good grief....  now she's really lost the plot.

Quote:
Feminist activist Yassmin Abdel-Magied sought advice from Hizb ut-Tahrir
The Australian
12:00AM February 20, 2017
Rick Morton

The activist who proclaimed Islam was “the most feminist religion” reached out to the spokesman for anti-gay and anti-women group Hizb ut-Tahrir in the wake of her fight on ABC TV’s program Q&A for advice on how she could have framed her argu­ment better.

Hizb ut-Tahrir spokes­man Wassim Doureihi posted on his personal Facebook page that Muslims were more angry with independent senator Jacqui Lambie, who wants to ban the burka, instead of two other government MPs who “belong to parties that have bombed Muslims abroad, criminalised Muslims at home, and jailed Muslims seeking refuge from both”.

Mr Doureihi and others criti­cised Yassmin Abdel-Magied for argu­ing through a “secular lens” and not having the required deep knowledge of Islam to prosecute her case.

“Salams! Well, I am always happy to take feedback,” Ms Abdel-Magied wrote in response.

“What specifically was problematic and how can I do better in the future inshallah? I am young, and willing to learn, inshallah. Trying to do the best with the platform I can, Allah willing.”

Mr Doureihi famously refused to condemn Islamic State for indiscrimin­ate acts of violence, includ­ing against Muslims, and declined to use his platform to implor­e young Muslim men in particular from joining the terrorist group.

He said the West only wanted to use Islamic State as a “bogeyman” to condemn an entire religion.

After Mr Doureihi told Ms Abdel-Magied she “ended up framing Islam through a secular lens, aimed at a secular people and conscious of the presence of a secular government”, the author and activist said: “Ah indeed. Sigh. This is always a tricky one. Will DM (private message) you.”

Another spokesman for the group, Uthman Badar, had a talk at Sydney’s Festival of Dangerous Ideas cancelled in 2014 after a backlash against the topic
“Honour killings are morally justified”.


Mr Badar did not choose the topic, although he did consent to it, and later argued he was not going to defend the practice.

In February 2014, he defend­ed the forced marriage of a girl, age 12, to a Muslim man aged 26.

“Something being illegal ­according to Western law does not make it immoral,” he said in a press release.

Hizb ut-Tahrir was taken to the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal after a 2014 lecture in which women were told to sit at the back while men had seats reserved in the front. The tribunal found Alison Bevage, a reporter, had been discriminated against based on her sex.

After Malcolm Turnbull hosted an Iftar dinner with anti-gay cleric Sheik Shady Alsuleiman last year, the Prime Minister condemned the preacher’s views on homosexuality, which in turn prompted a response from Mr Badar.

He said on Facebook that Mr Turnbull was condemning the “normative Islam­­­ic position on homosex­uality”.

Ms Abdel-Magied said yesterday that she had “not seen anything­ by HT (Hizb ut-Tahrir)” but did not respond when asked about her communications with Mr Doureihi. Mr Doureihi saw questions put to him by The Australian but did not respond.


She knows nothing of Hizb ut-Tahrir?  Really.  I'm not Muslim yet I do.  Just how ignorant are these people about what is going on around them? Cheesy




She is a taxpayer funded apologists for the very worst behaviours of muslims; she is just not very good at it, that's all.



Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 
Send Topic Print