polite_gandalf
Gold Member
Offline
Australian Politics
Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender:
|
rhino wrote on Feb 20 th, 2017 at 8:12pm: polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 20 th, 2017 at 5:16pm: rhino wrote on Feb 20 th, 2017 at 2:20pm: polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 20 th, 2017 at 12:49pm: rhino wrote on Feb 20 th, 2017 at 12:18pm: polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 20 th, 2017 at 11:55am: Lord Herbert wrote on Feb 20 th, 2017 at 7:24am: polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 20 th, 2017 at 6:44am: rhino wrote on Feb 20 th, 2017 at 1:11am: A right-wing group is campaigning against the Sudanese-born writer for telling the Q&A program last week her Sharia meant she was obliged to obey Australian law. Outrageous. It sure is. 'Sharia' is discriminatory against women in that if you should happen to shake a woman's hand as is the custom in the West, you may not be able to control the instantaneous impulse to rape this loose and profligate bitch-dog Unbeliever. link But Herb are you outraged at this uppity muslim asserting that she is obligated by her religion to obey Australian law? And yet supports Sharia law, contradiction dont you think? No contradiction at all, and at the risk of repeating myself, I'll let Ruby explain the point - agian... Quote:It is clear to me that when Lambie talks of "Sharia law" she is referring to the regressive dogma enforced in the criminal codes of some Muslim-majority countries, while to liberal Muslims like Abdel-Magied, Sharia is about private, personal ethics.
It shouldn't be that difficult to make a distinction between the two and it could be as simple as qualifying the difference between criminal Sharia law, or hudud, and the private moral code.
As long as we fail to make this simple but vital distinction, Muslims will continue to be demonised and the real issue will continue to be missed.
http://www.smh.com.au/lifestyle/news-and-views/opinion/why-its-not-enough-to-cou... Yes, we know that she is claiming that but that is not Sharia law in reality is it? You cannot say that in practise Sharia law allows individuals to practise their own version of it. Why can't I say? Because you see a few boof heads claiming that on TV - and because those few take up all the media coverage of muslims? I suspect that like Lambie, this is actually the first time you've heard of a sharia law that doesn't involve beheadings and amputations - and just like Lambie, you dismiss it out of hand. Why? Well thats not really clear. There is certainly no legitimate reason. But whatever the reason, it leads you to unfairly default to accusing her and others who argue the same, as liars, hypocrites etc. As for your question about sharia law not allowing freedom of thought. Easily refuted: there is no compulsion in religion - Quran 2:256 The truth is from your Lord, so whoever wills - let him believe; and whoever wills - let him disbelieve - Quran 18:29 Nice deflection. However, name one area which practises Sharia law which allows individual interpretations and practise. In the practices of the majority of muslims in Australia - for a start. Yes thats right, sharia law is flourishing in Australia. Think about it. to liberal Muslims like Abdel-Magied, Sharia is about private, personal ethics.
|