Thanks Karnal for letting us know just how big this "tiny minority" is:

Karnal wrote on Mar 11^th, 2017 at 5:19pm:




http://www.pewforum.org/2013/04/30/the-worlds-muslims-religion-politics-society-overview/

When Muslims around the world say they want sharia to be the law of the land, what role do they envision for religious law in their country? First, many, but by no means all, supporters of sharia believe the law of Islam should apply only to Muslims. In addition, those who favor Islamic law tend to be most comfortable with its application to questions of family and property. In some regions, fewer back the imposition of severe punishments in criminal cases, such as cutting off the hands of thieves – an area of sharia known in Arabic as hudud. But in South Asia and the Middle East and North Africa, medians of more than half back both severe criminal punishments and the death penalty for Muslims who renounce their faith.

Cutting off people's hands:

Its a fair question, but it should not be used to allow Muzlims to condone atrocities in the private. You have to remember, whether committing an atrocity or defending Mohamed's instructions to commit atrocities, they all believe the same thing when it comes to we infidels.

As this fellow indicates, Muzlims have an obligation to the Koran. Sure, they'll cherry pick it when faced with Western public opinion, but get one of them to actually swear that the Koran and Mohamed are fallible. The only way the can do that is by lying. Trust Muzlims at your peril.

Can a muslim who thinks muslims who leave Islam should have their heads chopped of be considered moderate?

Can a muslim who thinks gays should be executed be considered moderate?

Really, we've moved on from pretending 'fanatics' means people doing/thinking actual extremist things.

We're now at the stage where a 'fanatic' is casually accepted as a muslim who merely takes the Quran seriously as the word of God. Dear old Pauline is spruiking this meme now. That way we dispense with that annoying little inconvenience of having to concede the muslim fanatics are only a minority.

polite_gandalf wrote on Mar 12^th, 2017 at 12:21pm:



It's a pretty fanatical, out-there, mind-f***d thing to believe that the Koran is the eternal, unalterable and final word of god. There is no room for sanity in that belief. The doctrine is dripping with evidently Mohammed-made hyperbole and nonsense so if you actually believe it you are clearly a fanatic.

IMO, there is no difference, in practical terms, between a 'moslem' [a follower of ISLAM], and a member of ISIS [a follower of ISLAM], a member of Boko Haram [a follower of ISLAM], a member of Al Shabab [a follower of ISLAM],          or gandalf [a follower of ISLAM].


The truth is, that at any moment, any moslem can decide that this is the instant that he wants a taste of Allah's bordello in the sky.


Moslems ?

A moslem is a follower of ISLAM.       < -------- dictionary definition.

And ISLAM teaches the moslem, that all disbelievers are the enemies of Allah.     [Koran 2.98]

And ISLAMIC religious doctrine teaches, that the moslem who fights and kills an enemy of Allah, is a virtuous and good moslem.     [Koran 9.111]



.



IMAGE....





Quote:
- 'Aussie' EX-moslem, Mohamed Elomar, quoting ISLAMIC scripture.



Google;






.





IMAGE.....




Quote:

ISLAMIC religious scholar, Sayyid Qutb




.




Moslems, are a group of people who follow a 'religion' [i.e. a death cult called ISLAM] which teaches the moslem that killing disbelievers is a wholly 'lawful' act.

< ----------



It can be 'fun' to allow people like moslems to live among us !

/sarc off



-------- >

IMAGE...




QUESTION;
What 'set off' Farhad Khalil Mohammad Jabar on that fateful day, to decide to murder Australian Curtis Cheng in Parramatta, NSW ???

ANSWER;
ONLY ALLAH KNOWS!



n.b.
ISLAMIC culture encouraged Farhad Khalil Mohammad Jabar, to murder Australian Curtis Cheng.



Farhad Khalil Mohammad Jabar was inspired by ISLAM's imperative, which urged him TO KILL THE ENEMIES OF ALLAH.