She's probably a good choice given the current state of the psyche of the australian voter.

Fat steve , the australian voter, sees life only in terms of what he can "take". he has no concept of contribution.
His mentality is one of apathy, lethargy, pleasuring himself and numbing his brain with sugar and fat and booze and trashy TV.

Such a person is in "low vibration energy". he sees no big picture for himself . his dreams are shattered and all he wants to do is "cope". just "cope" with this harsh world.

Such a person (ie  the majority of voters) can only vibe with a whiney, negative, butt hurt, anxious, fearful and toxic marrative.  This is the narrative of the labor party. there is no plan, there is no support for the people with grit, guts and determination, there is only pandering to the "takers".  because the majority are now takers and leaners, the country will enter a downward spiral.

everyone will descend into blame, playing the victim, being needy and trying to grab their share.
this is not the recipe for a successful, dynamic economy and community.
the recipe for success is

maximal personal responsibility
maximal support for the entrepreneurs and small business people
maximal community spirit divorced from central government.

these 3 ideas are the opposite of the labor ideology which stands for

no personal responsibility...the nanny state
no support for entrepreneurs ...support for public sector chodes
big government and not local communities.

Miss P may well become PM but she is pandering to the lowest of aspirations...the aspiration to take and to be selfish and to see contribution as a dirty word...she and her party are so far from the "narrow road to success" they will never find it

Pilbeserk?
Pull the other one...

Youliar posts. . .a lie.

The electorate sure isnt responding favourably to the libtards decision to cut penalty rates , you would think they wouldve learnt after work choices 

lee wrote on Mar 30^th, 2017 at 9:58pm:

Correct. The uniform swing is a fairly good predictor of the number of seats that may change hands, but not necessarily which seats.

What ends up happening is some seats don't swing much, or at all, or even go against the trend. Other seats on double-digit margins end up falling.

See the recent WA state election for examples. Swing against the Liberals: 12.71%. Biggest swing in that election for a seat that changed hands: 23.0% (Bunbury). Biggest pre-election margin for a seat to change hands: 18.3% (Jandakot).

And the polls will not turn because all the Lib policies are unpopular (because they are stupid, made out of ideology not evidence) and turdfull can’t change them because the right wing loonies won’t let him.

Its time wrote on Mar 31^st, 2017 at 12:47pm:



what did that "Buffoon" say Willis???..

I love what Keating says about Libtards , they're going backwards so fast there is bugs on the rear window 

To funny