Richdude wrote on May 10
th, 2017 at 1:08pm:
SadKangaroo wrote on May 10
th, 2017 at 12:50pm:
Fine, I'll take your inability to answer as you being too afraid to.
You prove at every opportunity that you deserve nobody's respect around here. I'd call you a pathetic joke but it's not even funny anymore.
Just keep posting your fake news you hypocrite.
Mr Kangaroo I think the alternative media must be new to you.
You need to learn about what really happens not the what the MSM provides for you in the shop front window. It comes as a bit of a shock to all of us to learn the degree to which we have been lied to.
That is OK - we all started where you are now and you are about to learn. So sit back and enjoy the ride.
Remember its all Russia's fault.
You can try and belittle me all you like. The reason that I wanted to know what part of that particular video is fake in Light's opinion (you know, since it's his original claim and supporting evidence) is after doing the research there is a lot of conflicting evidence.
Firstly the comments from the reporter himself from 2009 that they were in fact in Saudi Arabia and claims to the contrary are totally untrue. Sure that will easily be dismissed as a cover up by weak mined conspiracy nuts who only need evidence when it's regarding claims they don't like, and they never accept any evidence put forward as legitimate anyway, so we move on...
Then there are plenty of behind the scenes photos and video of the broadcast location on the top of the hotel and the view to the city and airport that show they were in fact where they claimed to be (not in a studio, or on a set or even on top of the CNN building state side) and you can even see in some shots the wooden huts in the background that had been built by the other competing networks for their broadcasts on site.
Then there are the claims that CNN admit that it was fake and publically apologised for it. Great, but there is literally zero evidence of that anywhere online. Lots of people talk about it but nobody has ever posted it, EVER.
So if it's not that then it must be the claims that were made during the actual live crosses. Yes they were very speculative (which is putting it nicely) but they openly admit they didn't know for sure the type of missiles etc being used or if they were chemical or not even if they adorned their gas masks just in case.
They even said at times they were speculating as to what the causes of the blasts were, but there were in fact blasts.
In the race to be first to report they didn't have all the facts. I'm not trying to defend that, but how does that equate to a premeditated attempt to not only mislead people but push a certain agenda?
This is another reason why I'd like to know what light considers to be Fake News, so we can all at least be talking about the same thing.
The standard of mainstream journalism these days even going back to the 90's is terrible and I'm not for a minute trying to defend that. Faux Balance, Opinion as fact, the shitshow of guests talking over each other, we all deserve better.
But crying wolf about fake news, or blatantly lying about it as Light has been caught doing before only make things worse.
Light spreads fake news to counter fake news, it's utterly moronic, which I suspect is why he refuses to answer my questions lest he be caught out again and his abandonment of his "namaste" stance and resorting to petty attacks and insults just strengths that.
Next he'll be playing the victim. Anything to avoid being exposed as the liar he is.
He quickly buried the highlighting of his belief that Michelle Obama is a man too. He really should just own his claims, but that would take conviction.
I'm happy to provide what I've found about this video as I have done before, but this time I won't do it until Light decides to make clear what part of the video evidence of "fake news"
that he submit himself, proves beyond doubt that it is somehow fake and therefore all mainstream media cannot be trusted. I would also like to know what he considers fake news too as he's accused those with differing opinions as "fake news".
I'm after some consistency otherwise this "debate" is just a nutter posting the same youtube videos over and over.
I've given him the benefit of the doubt many times and all I get in return is just spam spam spam, reposing the same crap over and over across multiple threads to bury my comments.
And that coward accuses me of having my head in the sand, please...