Australian Politics Forum - It's OK to hit women

Grappler Truth Teller Feller Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 83830 Proud pre-1850's NO Voter Gender:	Re: It's OK to hit women Reply #195 - Apr 16^th, 2017 at 10:15pm freediver wrote on Apr 16^th, 2017 at 9:56pm: It was a Biblical reference. Argh aye... so we know it in the Biblical sense..... (aaaargh)....
Back to top	“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.” ― John Adams IP Logged

freediver

Gold Member

Offline

www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48834
At my desk.

Re: It's OK to hit women
Reply #196 - Apr 17^th, 2017 at 9:15am

Aussie wrote on Apr 16^th, 2017 at 10:07pm:

freediver wrote on Apr 16^th, 2017 at 9:51pm:

So why do Mothra, Aussie, Brian and the rest do this elaborate tapdance, but Greg has no problem calling it for what it is?

No tap dance by me Effendi. Why would you say such an absurd thing when you are very identifiable as the only Poster here who never, ever answers a question put directly to them?

So what do you think of the Koranic command to beat disobedient women? Do you need me to quote it for you again because you have suppressed the memory?

Back to top

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 35267
Gender: female

Re: It's OK to hit women
Reply #197 - Apr 17^th, 2017 at 10:03am

freediver wrote on Apr 16^th, 2017 at 9:51pm:

So why do Mothra, Aussie, Brian and the rest do this elaborate tapdance, but Greg has no problem calling it for what it is?

I have twice on this thread alone unreservedly condemned any suggestion of violence towards women.

Not answering your question was not a "tap-dance", FD. It was a particularly stupid question.

As was pointed out to you.

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

freediver

Gold Member

Offline

www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48834
At my desk.

Re: It's OK to hit women
Reply #198 - Apr 17^th, 2017 at 10:15am

mothra wrote on Apr 17^th, 2017 at 10:03am:

freediver wrote on Apr 16^th, 2017 at 9:51pm:

So why do Mothra, Aussie, Brian and the rest do this elaborate tapdance, but Greg has no problem calling it for what it is?

I have twice on this thread alone unreservedly condemned any suggestion of violence towards women.

Not answering your question was not a "tap-dance", FD. It was a particularly stupid question.

As was pointed out to you.

I recall seeing you squirm rather than give an opinion on the Koranic command to beat disobedient women. Of course you oppose violence towards women. Except when it comes from the Koran of course. Then the tapdancing begins.

Back to top

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.

IP Logged

cods

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 88048

Re: It's OK to hit women
Reply #199 - Apr 17^th, 2017 at 10:16am

mothra wrote on Apr 17^th, 2017 at 10:03am:

freediver wrote on Apr 16^th, 2017 at 9:51pm:

So why do Mothra, Aussie, Brian and the rest do this elaborate tapdance, but Greg has no problem calling it for what it is?

I have twice on this thread alone unreservedly condemned any suggestion of violence towards women.

Not answering your question was not a "tap-dance", FD. It was a particularly stupid question.

As was pointed out to you.

you do think changing the word MUTILATION to CUTTING is a step in the right direction though..

at the end of the day.... its still violence against women in this case defencless young girls.

no matter what you call it. Angry

Back to top

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 35267
Gender: female

Re: It's OK to hit women
Reply #200 - Apr 17^th, 2017 at 10:16am

freediver wrote on Apr 17^th, 2017 at 10:15am:

mothra wrote on Apr 17^th, 2017 at 10:03am:

freediver wrote on Apr 16^th, 2017 at 9:51pm:

So why do Mothra, Aussie, Brian and the rest do this elaborate tapdance, but Greg has no problem calling it for what it is?

I have twice on this thread alone unreservedly condemned any suggestion of violence towards women.

Not answering your question was not a "tap-dance", FD. It was a particularly stupid question.

As was pointed out to you.

I recall seeing you squirm rather than give an opinion on the Koranic command to beat disobedient women. Of course you oppose violence towards women. Except when it comes from the Koran of course. Then the tapdancing begins.

I didn't squirm at all. I said it wasn't a command.

I see you still son't understand that.

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

freediver

Gold Member

Offline

www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48834
At my desk.

Re: It's OK to hit women
Reply #201 - Apr 17^th, 2017 at 10:22am

mothra wrote on Apr 17^th, 2017 at 10:16am:

freediver wrote on Apr 17^th, 2017 at 10:15am:

mothra wrote on Apr 17^th, 2017 at 10:03am:

freediver wrote on Apr 16^th, 2017 at 9:51pm:

So why do Mothra, Aussie, Brian and the rest do this elaborate tapdance, but Greg has no problem calling it for what it is?

I have twice on this thread alone unreservedly condemned any suggestion of violence towards women.

Not answering your question was not a "tap-dance", FD. It was a particularly stupid question.

As was pointed out to you.

I recall seeing you squirm rather than give an opinion on the Koranic command to beat disobedient women. Of course you oppose violence towards women. Except when it comes from the Koran of course. Then the tapdancing begins.

I didn't squirm at all. I said it wasn't a command.

I see you still son't understand that.

You are still squirming, and you have still not offered an opinion on it, regardless of the label we give it.

The tapdancing continues. Who knows what elaborate footwork we will see from Mothra in the next post? My bet is an unreserved condemnation of violence towards women, but more excuses for why he cannot possibly criticise the Koran for commanding Muslims to beat women.

Back to top

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 35267
Gender: female

Re: It's OK to hit women
Reply #202 - Apr 17^th, 2017 at 10:30am

freediver wrote on Apr 17^th, 2017 at 10:22am:

mothra wrote on Apr 17^th, 2017 at 10:16am:

freediver wrote on Apr 17^th, 2017 at 10:15am:

mothra wrote on Apr 17^th, 2017 at 10:03am:

freediver wrote on Apr 16^th, 2017 at 9:51pm:

So why do Mothra, Aussie, Brian and the rest do this elaborate tapdance, but Greg has no problem calling it for what it is?

I have twice on this thread alone unreservedly condemned any suggestion of violence towards women.

Not answering your question was not a "tap-dance", FD. It was a particularly stupid question.

As was pointed out to you.

I recall seeing you squirm rather than give an opinion on the Koranic command to beat disobedient women. Of course you oppose violence towards women. Except when it comes from the Koran of course. Then the tapdancing begins.

I didn't squirm at all. I said it wasn't a command.

I see you still son't understand that.

You are still squirming, and you have still not offered an opinion on it, regardless of the label we give it.

The tapdancing continues. Who knows what elaborate footwork we will see from Mothra in the next post? My bet is an unreserved condemnation of violence towards women, but more excuses for why he cannot possibly criticise the Koran for commanding Muslims to beat women.

I'm not squirming in the slightest.

You are asking a stupid question. I am not going to answer a stupid question.

I have, despite what you say, openly criticised any suggestion of violence towards women twice on this thread alone. Wherever or whoever it comes from.

Just because i'm not jumping through the dodgy hoop you're holding tremourously for me doesn't mean i'm "tap-dancing".

You see FD, i hold people to account for what they say. Precisely what they say. We are dealing with the written word here. I say what i mean and i men what i say. I hold everyone on here to the same principle.

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

freediver

Gold Member

Offline

www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48834
At my desk.

Re: It's OK to hit women
Reply #203 - Apr 17^th, 2017 at 11:10am

mothra wrote on Apr 17^th, 2017 at 10:30am:

freediver wrote on Apr 17^th, 2017 at 10:22am:

mothra wrote on Apr 17^th, 2017 at 10:16am:

freediver wrote on Apr 17^th, 2017 at 10:15am:

mothra wrote on Apr 17^th, 2017 at 10:03am:

freediver wrote on Apr 16^th, 2017 at 9:51pm:

So why do Mothra, Aussie, Brian and the rest do this elaborate tapdance, but Greg has no problem calling it for what it is?

I have twice on this thread alone unreservedly condemned any suggestion of violence towards women.

Not answering your question was not a "tap-dance", FD. It was a particularly stupid question.

As was pointed out to you.

I recall seeing you squirm rather than give an opinion on the Koranic command to beat disobedient women. Of course you oppose violence towards women. Except when it comes from the Koran of course. Then the tapdancing begins.

I didn't squirm at all. I said it wasn't a command.

I see you still son't understand that.

You are still squirming, and you have still not offered an opinion on it, regardless of the label we give it.

The tapdancing continues. Who knows what elaborate footwork we will see from Mothra in the next post? My bet is an unreserved condemnation of violence towards women, but more excuses for why he cannot possibly criticise the Koran for commanding Muslims to beat women.

I'm not squirming in the slightest.

You are asking a stupid question. I am not going to answer a stupid question.

I have, despite what you say, openly criticised any suggestion of violence towards women twice on this thread alone. Wherever or whoever it comes from.

Just because i'm not jumping through the dodgy hoop you're holding tremourously for me doesn't mean i'm "tap-dancing".

You see FD, i hold people to account for what they say. Precisely what they say. We are dealing with the written word here. I say what i mean and i men what i say. I hold everyone on here to the same principle.

So you refuse to give your opinion on the Koranic command to beat disobedient women, at the same as insisting you will openly criticise any suggestion of violence towards women, regardless of where it comes from?

Back to top

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 35267
Gender: female

Re: It's OK to hit women
Reply #204 - Apr 17^th, 2017 at 11:16am

freediver wrote on Apr 17^th, 2017 at 11:10am:

mothra wrote on Apr 17^th, 2017 at 10:30am:

freediver wrote on Apr 17^th, 2017 at 10:22am:

mothra wrote on Apr 17^th, 2017 at 10:16am:

freediver wrote on Apr 17^th, 2017 at 10:15am:

mothra wrote on Apr 17^th, 2017 at 10:03am:

freediver wrote on Apr 16^th, 2017 at 9:51pm:

So why do Mothra, Aussie, Brian and the rest do this elaborate tapdance, but Greg has no problem calling it for what it is?

I have twice on this thread alone unreservedly condemned any suggestion of violence towards women.

Not answering your question was not a "tap-dance", FD. It was a particularly stupid question.

As was pointed out to you.

I recall seeing you squirm rather than give an opinion on the Koranic command to beat disobedient women. Of course you oppose violence towards women. Except when it comes from the Koran of course. Then the tapdancing begins.

I didn't squirm at all. I said it wasn't a command.

I see you still son't understand that.

You are still squirming, and you have still not offered an opinion on it, regardless of the label we give it.

The tapdancing continues. Who knows what elaborate footwork we will see from Mothra in the next post? My bet is an unreserved condemnation of violence towards women, but more excuses for why he cannot possibly criticise the Koran for commanding Muslims to beat women.

I'm not squirming in the slightest.

You are asking a stupid question. I am not going to answer a stupid question.

I have, despite what you say, openly criticised any suggestion of violence towards women twice on this thread alone. Wherever or whoever it comes from.

Just because i'm not jumping through the dodgy hoop you're holding tremourously for me doesn't mean i'm "tap-dancing".

You see FD, i hold people to account for what they say. Precisely what they say. We are dealing with the written word here. I say what i mean and i men what i say. I hold everyone on here to the same principle.

So you refuse to give your opinion on the Koranic command to beat disobedient women, at the same as insisting you will openly criticise any suggestion of violence towards women, regardless of where it comes from?

Focus FD. Do try. I'm firmly of the opinion that you're not very bright but even you should be able to follow this.

If it were a "command", then all Muslim men would beat "disobedient" women, yes?

I reiterate. It's a stupid question.

I have unreservedly given my opinion on any suggestion of beating women.

You're just having a little tanty because i don't agree with the terminology you are not so subtly trying to bully me into agreeing with.

Even by your standards, this is pathetic.

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

freediver

Gold Member

Offline

www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48834
At my desk.

Re: It's OK to hit women
Reply #205 - Apr 17^th, 2017 at 12:37pm

mothra wrote on Apr 17^th, 2017 at 11:16am: