KangAnon wrote on Apr 14^th, 2018 at 8:22am:


That is not true!

Never happened - where's your evidence Sad One?

it_is_the_light wrote on Apr 14^th, 2018 at 8:11am:




it_is_the_light wrote on Apr 14^th, 2018 at 8:18am:

Dnarever wrote on Apr 15^th, 2018 at 8:57am:

Dnarever wrote on Apr 15^th, 2018 at 8:54am:


Not true. Mr Trump has been honest about plenty of things.

The Deep State, Soros, Hillary, the US getting ripped off by all these shthole countries. People need to know these things. We need to make an informed decision about our erected leaders, no?

Karnal wrote on Apr 15^th, 2018 at 6:21pm:


Who needs facts when you've got feelings?

KangAnon wrote on Apr 15^th, 2018 at 7:15pm:


The assertions you make are not backed up by the "evidence" you provide.

There is no evidence that Trump asked Russia to hack emails.

Cambridge Analytica was approached by someone but we do not know who (except Sad One).

The DNC was not hacked - the emails were stolen by a staffer. The evidence is that the download speeds were much faster than an online hack can provide. Assange has indicated that it was Seth Rich the murdered Bernie supporter and DNC staffer who was the source.

You'll never get the truth from the NBC or CNN - that assuming that you are interested.

Richdude wrote on Apr 16^th, 2018 at 1:06am:


On a more serious note, you just saw the video where Trump said,

"Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing."

You're take away from that is Trump wasn't asking them to hack Clinton's emails?

Cambridge Analytica's own CEO admitted to working for Trump, and he was also the one who said they reached out to wikileaks wanting Clinton's emails released to them and the world, further corroborated by Assange's tweet confirming he denied the request.

The most interesting part of your post, is with all your demands of proof and claims of caring for evidence, you then start talking about Seth Rich.

Yes he was murdered BUT, his murder spawned several right-wing conspiracy theories, including the claim that Rich had been involved with the leaked DNC emails in 2016, which runs contrary to the U.S. intelligence's conclusion the leaked DNC emails were part of Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections.

Law enforcement as well as fact-checking websites like PolitiFact.com, Snopes.com, and FactCheck.org stated that these theories were false and unfounded.

The New York Times, Los Angeles Times, and The Washington Post called the fabrications fake news and falsehoods.

Since you care so much about evidence, are you able to provide any to back up your claim, or will you end up posting Fox News opinion pieces and should I pre-emptivly throw you own words back in your face,

You'll never get the truth from Fox News - that assuming that you are interested.?