POLICE ADMIT:
SUDANESE 44 TIMES MORE LIKELY TO BREAK LAW
Andrew Bolt, Herald Sun
April 13, 2017 9:23am
After years of evasions, Victoria Police reveals the full catastrophe of the Howard Government's decision to let in poorly educated Sudanese refugees from tribal war zones who'd struggle to fit in.
Sudanese make up just 0.11 per cent of Victoria's population but 4.8 per cent of aggravated burglary offenders.
That makes them 44 times more likely to break the law.
Then there are these statistics:
But Sudanese youths were vastly over-represented in the 2015 data, responsible for 7.44 per cent of home invasions, 5.65 per cent of car thefts and 13.9 per cent of aggravated robberies, despite Sudanese-born citizens making up about 0.11 per cent of Victoria's population.
Nearly 70 times more likely, then, to commit a home invasion than are Australian-born youths.
Yes, most Sudanese do not break the law. Yes, it is nice to help the victims of war. But why have we put so many Victorians in danger by letting in people who so plainly would struggle to adapt?
And why the years of falsehoods and coverup?
Remember the falsehoods once spread by then Chief Commissioner of police Christine Nixon, after Immigration Minister Kevin Andrews said Sudanese crime rates were too high and he was cutting the immigration intake?:
But worst was the reaction of Victoria Police, led by Labor-appointed Christine Nixon.
Nixon claimed Andrews was wrong about Sudanese crime rates: “They’re not, in a sense, represented more than the proportion of them in the population.”
A police multicultural liaison officer agreed: “There’s an under-representation of the Sudanese in crime stats.”
Those police claims were false. Figures let slip by Nixon the following year revealed crime rates for Sudanese youth at least four times the state average.
And that's now got dramatically worse.
But remember also how the multicultural lobby and media Left vilified Andrews for telling the truth and trying to stop us from importing even more danger?
The ethnic lobby predictably denounced him as a racist, as did Labor politicians.
“It has been a long time since I have heard such a pure form of racism out of the mouth of any Australian politician,” sneered Queensland premier Anna Bligh.
We had a “leadership which allows divisiveness”, stormed the Victorian Equal Opportunity and Human Rights Commission.
And the elite media pack-attacked.
The Age accused Andrews of making “unpleasant and inflammatory” comments to provoke “a predictably base reaction from those sensitive to immigration on racial grounds”.
Where are the apologies? Where's the acknowledgement that the Left made a terrible mistake?
The ABC has also consistently tried to ignore, hide or diminish the problem with specious arguments like this:
Commentators have linked a recent spate of crimes to the so-called Apex gang, heightening anti-migration rhetoric, but police statistics show most home invasions, car thefts and aggravated robberies are committed by people born in Australia.
Of course most such crimes are committed by the dominant demographic, but note the evasions. First, how many of those born in Australia are actually born to Sudanese parents? Second, and more relevant: what is the crime rate of each ethnic group?
Yes, the born-here cohort commit crime, but why are we adding to the problem by importing people 44 times more likely to bash, rob and smash into your home?
Meanwhile the ABC continues to hire - and never, ever questions - the Minister who so foolishly let in so many Sudanese who would obviously struggle to fit in. And to this day, Amanda Vanstone is hailed by the Left as the more compassionate of the Liberal immigration ministers, despite having helped to unleash mayhem.
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/blogs/andrew-bolt/police-admit-sudanese-44-times-mor...
Forum
Pages: 1 
