Valkie wrote on Jun 14^th, 2017 at 7:05pm:



Kevin Rudd should make an apology.

When 'William' becomes KING.

His first major duty will be to 'remove' the Union Jack from the Australian Flag.

"With this auspicious moment of mine, that I hereby remove the Union Jack from that bloody convict rag and set forth the future of Australia like a kick out the door. God speed and good riddance!"

Australia will be forced to become a Republic and the World will flood into the country in their MILLIONS !!

Labors virtue signalling and virtual invite lost control of the borders. Read Triumph and Demise, Julia knew it even if numpties here deny it. 

But Rudd fixed it, with a tow back policy where safe to do so, Keatings mandatory detention legislation and Rudds country shoppers washing up in boats never ever to be settled in Australia legislation sorted it out.

Takes draconian measures but labor was up for it. 

The bill is labors but it was a small price to pay to stop the graph of country shopper arrivals reaching vertical.

John Smith wrote on Jun 14^th, 2017 at 8:00pm:


When were the contracts signed and the oversight initiated?  I don't know but I am sure you do.   . They didn't start entering the gulags as I have seen it described here under Libs. 

I don't think Labor would have done any better and it is dodgy speculation to think that they would have. 

You need to stop looking at things in the terms of footy teams and that your footy team does no wrong.  Plenty of blame to go around. Both parties are lock step but the legislation is Labors.  All of the punitive legislation is because idiots like you who barrack for teams allowed Labor to enact legislation that if attempted by Libs would have clowns like you howling. 

You and your fellow travellers did all this, you allowed and aided and abetted the virtue signalling that encouraged the country shoppers, you allowed the legislation that locked them up and you allowed the legislation that meant they could never ever settle here.

Thanks to your efforts, the borders are again secure. 

Secret Wars wrote on Jun 14^th, 2017 at 8:09pm:



rubbish. I always said they should fly them over to the mainland. That way there was no risk of drownings.
I never supported labors asylum seeker policy, I only ever supported it over the libs since it was the best option available off the two . You have to play with the cards you're dealt, not the cards you wish you had.

John Smith wrote on Jun 14^th, 2017 at 8:15pm:


Oversight in the  contracts that Labor would have signed.  It wasn't a difficult paragraph to understand. 

I don't think Labor would have done better, you opinion is that they would have.  Considering the dogs breakfast they made of the whole border situation I suspect I am closer to the truth than you are.

Having said that, they lost control of the borders but then regained control. They had to, it is an election losing issue having country shoppers washing up every day as happened under Labors watch. 

But now we are in the sunny uplands and you can bet that Labor at least won't be dismantling their legislations and if ever worse measures are needed, they will be up for again because idiots like you will let them.

Presumably Labor will be in the next election, there maybe some chancers who will try it on with a few boats.  What do you reckon Labors response will be? 

Met with fairy floss and welcomes or shipped off to detention? 

Bobby. wrote on Jun 14^th, 2017 at 8:19pm:


How many times did this Black Duck say that the whole of Operation Sovereign Borders was illegal?