polite_gandalf wrote on Jul 12
th, 2017 at 2:14pm:
freediver wrote on Jul 12
th, 2017 at 12:09pm:
Sure, but not in the context of a just war doctrine.
Why would the quran not be consistent between the two?
Do you realise that the whole point of a just war doctrine is that different principles apply to warfare and domestic justice?
Do you realise that "an eye for an eye" directly contradicts the self defence doctrine? Do you think it is a bit silly to use a verse to support Islam's doctrine of proportionality that directly contradicts the doctrine of self defence? Or is there a cherry picking doctrine I am not familiar with?
Quote:And by the way, most scholars agree that the phrase "do not transgress limits" - in the verse "Fight in the cause of Allah those who fight you, but do not transgress limits" 2:190) - as commanding a proportionality in self defense. Which makes sense when you think about it - otherwise what does it mean by "limits"? Common sense suggests that without a clear definition, 'proportional response' is the only way to make sense of 'limits' in this context.
It is a gap that you can fill in with whatever you want. However, Muhammad's own example would suggest the proportionality is not the intention. There are limits specified in the Koran. For example, wait until the sacred months are over. I believe there is a caveat on this one - unless you are attacked. If that is true, then Islam does apply the self defence doctrine, but only during the sacred months, and the need to make this distinction implies that the self defence doctrine does not apply outside those times. Another example is do not violate treaties, and do not kill women and goats. I think it makes more sense that the Koran is referring to the limits that the Koran sets out, not whatever non-Muslim standards people want to apply 1400 years later.
Can you substantiate this "most scholars" claim?
Why won't you say where you get all these silly ideas from?
How does your justification of Muhammad's career robbing and murdering Meccan traders as retribution for his mistreatement in Mecca fit in with the self defence and proportionality doctrines?