Australian Politics Forum - Winning: court upholds face veil ban

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 35600
Gender: female

Re: Winning: court upholds face veil ban
Reply #30 - Jul 13^th, 2017 at 7:39pm

Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 13^th, 2017 at 7:36pm:

It's funny how a feminist like Mothra supports women walking around life in a bag??

I support a woman's right to wear whatever she wants.

I find it the absolute height of hypocrisy that people like you and Frank tell women what they must not wear under the pretence that it for their rights.

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

Mr Hammer

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 25212
Gender: male

Re: Winning: court upholds face veil ban
Reply #31 - Jul 13^th, 2017 at 7:41pm

mothra wrote on Jul 13^th, 2017 at 7:39pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 13^th, 2017 at 7:36pm:

It's funny how a feminist like Mothra supports women walking around life in a bag??

I support a woman's right to wear whatever she wants.

I find it the absolute height of hypocrisy that people like you and Frank tell women what they must not wear under the pretence that it for their rights.

These woman have pressure put on them Mothra. It isn't their choice. What right minded human being would spend their life walking around in a bag??

Back to top

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 35600
Gender: female

Re: Winning: court upholds face veil ban
Reply #32 - Jul 13^th, 2017 at 7:43pm

Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 13^th, 2017 at 7:41pm:

mothra wrote on Jul 13^th, 2017 at 7:39pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 13^th, 2017 at 7:36pm:

It's funny how a feminist like Mothra supports women walking around life in a bag??

I support a woman's right to wear whatever she wants.

I find it the absolute height of hypocrisy that people like you and Frank tell women what they must not wear under the pretence that it for their rights.

These woman have pressure put on them Mothra. It isn't their choice. What right minded human being would spend their life walking around in a bag??

The women in Australia overwhelmingly report that it is their choice. Some even do it against their husband's wishes.

Have you not listened to them?

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

Mr Hammer

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 25212
Gender: male

Re: Winning: court upholds face veil ban
Reply #33 - Jul 13^th, 2017 at 7:44pm

mothra wrote on Jul 13^th, 2017 at 7:43pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 13^th, 2017 at 7:41pm:

mothra wrote on Jul 13^th, 2017 at 7:39pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 13^th, 2017 at 7:36pm:

It's funny how a feminist like Mothra supports women walking around life in a bag??

I support a woman's right to wear whatever she wants.

I find it the absolute height of hypocrisy that people like you and Frank tell women what they must not wear under the pretence that it for their rights.

These woman have pressure put on them Mothra. It isn't their choice. What right minded human being would spend their life walking around in a bag??

The women in Australia overwhelmingly report that it is their choice. Some even do it against their husband's wishes.

Have you not listened to them?

bs. they cover girls up when they are 8 years old. They are conditioned. Wake up to yourself.

Back to top

IP Logged

buzzanddidj

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 14214
Eganstown, via Daylesford, VIC
Gender: male

Re: Winning: court upholds face veil ban
Reply #34 - Jul 13^th, 2017 at 7:45pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 13^th, 2017 at 1:23pm:

It always amazes me just how many "men" are frightened by a piece of women's clothing.

Gotta laugh Grin

Not ME
But I'm used to ALL sorts of religious "trimmings"
Ive worked in retail, in a heavily Muslim populated suburb of Melbourne'

I've dealt with Muslim mothers and daughters - some veiled and some not
It's a personal gesture to God - and is in not enforced by ANYONE
It can be compared to the way some Christan women CHOOSE to wear crucifixes around their necks - and some Christian women DON'T

It's all really a matter of familiarising yourself with different religious and cultural practices

There's a few Islamophobes on Ozpolitic that could benefit from that familiarisation

Back to top

'I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians.
Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.'

- Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 35600
Gender: female

Re: Winning: court upholds face veil ban
Reply #35 - Jul 13^th, 2017 at 7:46pm

Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 13^th, 2017 at 7:44pm:

mothra wrote on Jul 13^th, 2017 at 7:43pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 13^th, 2017 at 7:41pm:

mothra wrote on Jul 13^th, 2017 at 7:39pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 13^th, 2017 at 7:36pm:

It's funny how a feminist like Mothra supports women walking around life in a bag??

I support a woman's right to wear whatever she wants.

I find it the absolute height of hypocrisy that people like you and Frank tell women what they must not wear under the pretence that it for their rights.

These woman have pressure put on them Mothra. It isn't their choice. What right minded human being would spend their life walking around in a bag??

The women in Australia overwhelmingly report that it is their choice. Some even do it against their husband's wishes.

Have you not listened to them?

bs. they cover girls up when they are 8 years old. They are conditioned. Wake up to yourself.

You're wrong Hammer. And you are doing exactly what you are complaining about. Telling women what they can or cannot wear.

You have no right to do that.

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

Mr Hammer

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 25212
Gender: male

Re: Winning: court upholds face veil ban
Reply #36 - Jul 13^th, 2017 at 7:46pm

buzzanddidj wrote on Jul 13^th, 2017 at 7:45pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 13^th, 2017 at 1:23pm:

It always amazes me just how many "men" are frightened by a piece of women's clothing.

Gotta laugh Grin

Not ME
But I'm used to ALL sorts of religious "trimmings"
Ive worked in retail, in a heavily Muslim populated suburb of Melbourne'

I've dealt with Muslim mothers and daughters - some veiled and some not
It's a personal gesture to God - and is in not enforced by ANYONE
It can be compared to the way some Christan women CHOOSE to wear crucifixes around their necks - and some Christian women DON'T

It's all really a matter of familiarising yourself with different religious and cultural practices

There's a few Islamophobes on Ozpolitic that could benefit from that familiarisation

rubbish.

Back to top

IP Logged

Mr Hammer

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 25212
Gender: male

Re: Winning: court upholds face veil ban
Reply #37 - Jul 13^th, 2017 at 7:47pm

mothra wrote on Jul 13^th, 2017 at 7:46pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 13^th, 2017 at 7:44pm:

mothra wrote on Jul 13^th, 2017 at 7:43pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 13^th, 2017 at 7:41pm:

mothra wrote on Jul 13^th, 2017 at 7:39pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 13^th, 2017 at 7:36pm:

It's funny how a feminist like Mothra supports women walking around life in a bag??

I support a woman's right to wear whatever she wants.

I find it the absolute height of hypocrisy that people like you and Frank tell women what they must not wear under the pretence that it for their rights.

These woman have pressure put on them Mothra. It isn't their choice. What right minded human being would spend their life walking around in a bag??

The women in Australia overwhelmingly report that it is their choice. Some even do it against their husband's wishes.

Have you not listened to them?

bs. they cover girls up when they are 8 years old. They are conditioned. Wake up to yourself.

You're wrong Hammer. And you are doing exactly what you are complaining about. Telling women what they can or cannot wear.

You have no right to do that.

Are you happy with skinheads wearing swastikas??

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 139937
Gender: male

Re: Winning: court upholds face veil ban
Reply #38 - Jul 13^th, 2017 at 7:47pm

Frank wrote on Jul 13^th, 2017 at 7:31pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 13^th, 2017 at 6:44pm:

cods: do you want these masks banned?

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/10/03/1412294881305_wps_21_Dana_jpg.jpg

Medical. Not ideological, Turdy McTurdface.

Hold on a minute, bucko.

You and your fellow Islamophobes frequently cite "security reasons" for banning Islamic face coverings.

Those burns masks cover the entire face, and there's no way of knowing who's under there.

Why doesn't that concern you?

Back to top

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 35600
Gender: female

Re: Winning: court upholds face veil ban
Reply #39 - Jul 13^th, 2017 at 7:48pm

Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 13^th, 2017 at 7:47pm:

mothra wrote on Jul 13^th, 2017 at 7:46pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 13^th, 2017 at 7:44pm:

mothra wrote on Jul 13^th, 2017 at 7:43pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 13^th, 2017 at 7:41pm:

mothra wrote on Jul 13^th, 2017 at 7:39pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 13^th, 2017 at 7:36pm:

It's funny how a feminist like Mothra supports women walking around life in a bag??

I support a woman's right to wear whatever she wants.

I find it the absolute height of hypocrisy that people like you and Frank tell women what they must not wear under the pretence that it for their rights.

These woman have pressure put on them Mothra. It isn't their choice. What right minded human being would spend their life walking around in a bag??

The women in Australia overwhelmingly report that it is their choice. Some even do it against their husband's wishes.

Have you not listened to them?

bs. they cover girls up when they are 8 years old. They are conditioned. Wake up to yourself.

You're wrong Hammer. And you are doing exactly what you are complaining about. Telling women what they can or cannot wear.

You have no right to do that.

Are you happy with skinheads wearing swastikas??

What does my happiness have to do with it?

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 35600
Gender: female

Re: Winning: court upholds face veil ban
Reply #40 - Jul 13^th, 2017 at 7:49pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 13^th, 2017 at 7:47pm:

Frank wrote on Jul 13^th, 2017 at 7:31pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 13^th, 2017 at 6:44pm:

cods: do you want these masks banned?

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/10/03/1412294881305_wps_21_Dana_jpg.jpg

Medical. Not ideological, Turdy McTurdface.

Hold on a minute, bucko.

You and your fellow Islamophobes frequently cite "security reasons" for banning Islamic face coverings.

Those burns masks cover the entire face, and there's no way of knowing who's under there.

Why doesn't that concern you?

The same could be said of how much make-up some women wear. They are completely unrecognisable from their natural faces.

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 139937
Gender: male

Re: Winning: court upholds face veil ban
Reply #41 - Jul 13^th, 2017 at 7:50pm

Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 13^th, 2017 at 7:47pm:

mothra wrote on Jul 13^th, 2017 at 7:46pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 13^th, 2017 at 7:44pm:

mothra wrote on Jul 13^th, 2017 at 7:43pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 13^th, 2017 at 7:41pm:

mothra wrote on Jul 13^th, 2017 at 7:39pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 13^th, 2017 at 7:36pm:

It's funny how a feminist like Mothra supports women walking around life in a bag??

I support a woman's right to wear whatever she wants.

I find it the absolute height of hypocrisy that people like you and Frank tell women what they must not wear under the pretence that it for their rights.

These woman have pressure put on them Mothra. It isn't their choice. What right minded human being would spend their life walking around in a bag??

The women in Australia overwhelmingly report that it is their choice. Some even do it against their husband's wishes.

Have you not listened to them?

bs. they cover girls up when they are 8 years old. They are conditioned. Wake up to yourself.

You're wrong Hammer. And you are doing exactly what you are complaining about. Telling women what they can or cannot wear.

You have no right to do that.

Are you happy with skinheads wearing swastikas??

Why would anyone be happy about that?

Moreover, a swastika isn't an item of clothing.

I'm surprised disappointed that you need that explained to you, Homo.

Back to top

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 48392
Gender: male

Re: Winning: court upholds face veil ban
Reply #42 - Jul 13^th, 2017 at 7:50pm

mothra wrote on Jul 13^th, 2017 at 7:37pm:

You do understand that the reasons women given for covering in Australia do not align with the reasons you apply to them, yes?

And do you seriously think that women aren't restricted in what they can and cannot wear in "your" culture? You know in some workplaces, women are expected to wear makeup, yes?

Behaviour in this culture is to be judged by the standards and expectation of this culture, not by every strange and alien one. If you are in Australia, accept the behavioural norms of Australia. Islam has no overriding claim on your behaviour while you are here. It CERTAINLY doesn't have an overriding claim on MY behaviour towards you. If you wish to prefer Islamic codes of behaviour here, I do not want to accept them as being also thereby applicable to me. So show your face when talking to me or f orf. Your submission to Islam does not demand that I also submit to Islam. F that. (but that is exactly the gambit claim, of course).

Muslim women have absolutely NO right to expect that everyone else must accept nd accommodate their covering up. How bloody arrogant can they be? And how thick and uncritical can YOU be, mother??

You are now agitating for Muslim womens' human right to self-abnegation, you silly goose.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Mr Hammer

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 25212
Gender: male

Re: Winning: court upholds face veil ban
Reply #43 - Jul 13^th, 2017 at 7:52pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 13^th, 2017 at 7:50pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 13^th, 2017 at 7:47pm:

mothra wrote on Jul 13^th, 2017 at 7:46pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 13^th, 2017 at 7:44pm:

mothra wrote on Jul 13^th, 2017 at 7:43pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 13^th, 2017 at 7:41pm:

mothra wrote on Jul 13^th, 2017 at 7:39pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 13^th, 2017 at 7:36pm:

It's funny how a feminist like Mothra supports women walking around life in a bag??

I support a woman's right to wear whatever she wants.

I find it the absolute height of hypocrisy that people like you and Frank tell women what they must not wear under the pretence that it for their rights.

These woman have pressure put on them Mothra. It isn't their choice. What right minded human being would spend their life walking around in a bag??

The women in Australia overwhelmingly report that it is their choice. Some even do it against their husband's wishes.

Have you not listened to them?

bs. they cover girls up when they are 8 years old. They are conditioned. Wake up to yourself.

You're wrong Hammer. And you are doing exactly what you are complaining about. Telling women what they can or cannot wear.

You have no right to do that.

Are you happy with skinheads wearing swastikas??

Why would anyone be happy about that?

Moreover, a swastika isn't an item of clothing.

I'm surprised disappointed that you need that explained to you, Homo.

It's their beliefs sh itbag and their choice. Stick to your beliefs hey?

Back to top

IP Logged

Mr Hammer

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 25212
Gender: male

Re: Winning: court upholds face veil ban
Reply #44 - Jul 13^th, 2017 at 7:53pm

mothra wrote on Jul 13^th, 2017 at 7:48pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 13^th, 2017 at 7:47pm:

mothra wrote on Jul 13^th, 2017 at 7:46pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 13^th, 2017 at 7:44pm:

mothra wrote on Jul 13^th, 2017 at 7:43pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 13^th, 2017 at 7:41pm:

mothra wrote on Jul 13^th, 2017 at 7:39pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 13^th, 2017 at 7:36pm:

It's funny how a feminist like Mothra supports women walking around life in a bag??

I support a woman's right to wear whatever she wants.

I find it the absolute height of hypocrisy that people like you and Frank tell women what they must not wear under the pretence that it for their rights.

These woman have pressure put on them Mothra. It isn't their choice. What right minded human being would spend their life walking around in a bag??

The women in Australia overwhelmingly report that it is their choice. Some even do it against their husband's wishes.

Have you not listened to them?

bs. they cover girls up when they are 8 years old. They are conditioned. Wake up to yourself.

You're wrong Hammer. And you are doing exactly what you are complaining about. Telling women what they can or cannot wear.

You have no right to do that.

Are you happy with skinheads wearing swastikas??

What does my happiness have to do with it?

Happiness? I'll throw that in the too hard basket.

Back to top

IP Logged