Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 ... 19
Send Topic Print
Islam - the Left looks away. (Read 40139 times)
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 49186
Gender: male
Re: Islam - the Left looks away.
Reply #15 - Jul 15th, 2017 at 9:16pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on Jul 15th, 2017 at 7:06pm:
Oh, dearie, dearie, me.  Soren, they aren't "anti-Muslim" barriers.  Muslims are still allowed to walk back and forth, through them.  They are anti-Extremist barriers.   There is a difference in the minds of intelligent people between Muslims and Islamists.   Your Islamophobia blinds you to it, though, doesn't it?  Tsk, tsk.    Roll Eyes



You just can't tell them apart, Muslims and Muslims.  There is no reliable way to tell them apart UNTIL they kill you.  Up to that point they are all 'vast majority Muslims'.  But what binds the active and passive ones is Islam.

And that massive elephant  - Islam - is what you all are soooo bloody keen to ignore. Which makes you idiots and mongs.  You must address Islam. It is the root of all evil Islamic deeds.




Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 43087
Re: Islam - the Left looks away.
Reply #16 - Jul 15th, 2017 at 9:25pm
 
Frank wrote on Jul 15th, 2017 at 9:16pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Jul 15th, 2017 at 7:06pm:
Oh, dearie, dearie, me.  Soren, they aren't "anti-Muslim" barriers.  Muslims are still allowed to walk back and forth, through them.  They are anti-Extremist barriers.   There is a difference in the minds of intelligent people between Muslims and Islamists.   Your Islamophobia blinds you to it, though, doesn't it?  Tsk, tsk.    Roll Eyes


You just can't tell them apart, Muslims and Muslims.  There is no reliable way to tell them apart UNTIL they kill you.  Up to that point they are all 'vast majority Muslims'.  But what binds the active and passive ones is Islam.

And that massive elephant  - Islam - is what you all are soooo bloody keen to ignore. Which makes you idiots and mongs.  You must address Islam. It is the root of all evil Islamic deeds.


Islamists do not strike out of no where, Soren.  Islamists take a long road to the point where they are willing to commit violence.    More often than not, it is other Muslims, alarmed at the violent and aggressive turn their friends/relatives have taken that report them, as the revelations after Manchest and London showed.  Unfortunately, all too often their reports are ignored by the authorities.   Perhaps instead of blaming the majority of Muslims you need to look closer to home, the authorities who think that no one represents a threat?   Or is that too hard a concept for you to grasp?

As for the barriers, they are intended to stop Extremists from using vehicles to kill people.   They are not intended to stop individuals.   I suppose, you'd just like to declare that no Muslims are allowed to drive anywhere, now wouldn't you?

Your Islamophobia is sickening, Soren.  Seek help.    Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Secret Wars
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3928
Gender: male
Re: Islam - the Left looks away.
Reply #17 - Jul 15th, 2017 at 9:34pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on Jul 15th, 2017 at 7:06pm:
Oh, dearie, dearie, me.  Soren, they aren't "anti-Muslim" barriers.  Muslims are still allowed to walk back and forth, through them.  They are anti-Extremist barriers.   There is a difference in the minds of intelligent people between Muslims and Islamists.   Your Islamophobia blinds you to it, though, doesn't it?  Tsk, tsk.    Roll Eyes


We are erecting barriers in our cities to protect us from cultists and you call others blind?

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 43087
Re: Islam - the Left looks away.
Reply #18 - Jul 15th, 2017 at 9:40pm
 
Secret Wars wrote on Jul 15th, 2017 at 9:34pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Jul 15th, 2017 at 7:06pm:
Oh, dearie, dearie, me.  Soren, they aren't "anti-Muslim" barriers.  Muslims are still allowed to walk back and forth, through them.  They are anti-Extremist barriers.   There is a difference in the minds of intelligent people between Muslims and Islamists.   Your Islamophobia blinds you to it, though, doesn't it?  Tsk, tsk.    Roll Eyes


We are erecting barriers in our cities to protect us from cultists and you call others blind?


Yes.  Islamophobia blinds people to reality.    Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 49186
Gender: male
Re: Islam - the Left looks away.
Reply #19 - Jul 15th, 2017 at 9:44pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on Jul 15th, 2017 at 9:25pm:
Frank wrote on Jul 15th, 2017 at 9:16pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Jul 15th, 2017 at 7:06pm:
Oh, dearie, dearie, me.  Soren, they aren't "anti-Muslim" barriers.  Muslims are still allowed to walk back and forth, through them.  They are anti-Extremist barriers.   There is a difference in the minds of intelligent people between Muslims and Islamists.   Your Islamophobia blinds you to it, though, doesn't it?  Tsk, tsk.    Roll Eyes


You just can't tell them apart, Muslims and Muslims.  There is no reliable way to tell them apart UNTIL they kill you.  Up to that point they are all 'vast majority Muslims'.  But what binds the active and passive ones is Islam.

And that massive elephant  - Islam - is what you all are soooo bloody keen to ignore. Which makes you idiots and mongs.  You must address Islam. It is the root of all evil Islamic deeds.


Islamists do not strike out of no where, Soren.  Islamists take a long road to the point where they are willing to commit violence.    More often than not, it is other Muslims, alarmed at the violent and aggressive turn their friends/relatives have taken that report them, as the revelations after Manchest and London showed.  Unfortunately, all too often their reports are ignored by the authorities.   Perhaps instead of blaming the majority of Muslims you need to look closer to home, the authorities who think that no one represents a threat?   Or is that too hard a concept for you to grasp?

As for the barriers, they are intended to stop Extremists from using vehicles to kill people.   They are not intended to stop individuals.   I suppose, you'd just like to declare that no Muslims are allowed to drive anywhere, now wouldn't you?

Your Islamophobia is sickening, Soren.  Seek help.    Roll Eyes


Extremists are not individuals, eh?  You are stupider than I though and that is saying something!!!!

ISLAM. Brian. It is about Islam. ISLAM rots their minds and makes them do evil thins.

You have not decoupled their evil deeds from Islam.  Calling me an Islamophobe is calling me sane under the circumstances.  Who the bloody hell would want to accommodate and tolerate a creed that gives rise to so much evil in the name of Islam?  Apart  from you, that is.

But then you are stupider than anyone could imagine. You have a degree in Stupid Studies.

Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 43087
Re: Islam - the Left looks away.
Reply #20 - Jul 15th, 2017 at 9:57pm
 
Frank wrote on Jul 15th, 2017 at 9:44pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Jul 15th, 2017 at 9:25pm:
Frank wrote on Jul 15th, 2017 at 9:16pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Jul 15th, 2017 at 7:06pm:
Oh, dearie, dearie, me.  Soren, they aren't "anti-Muslim" barriers.  Muslims are still allowed to walk back and forth, through them.  They are anti-Extremist barriers.   There is a difference in the minds of intelligent people between Muslims and Islamists.   Your Islamophobia blinds you to it, though, doesn't it?  Tsk, tsk.    Roll Eyes


You just can't tell them apart, Muslims and Muslims.  There is no reliable way to tell them apart UNTIL they kill you.  Up to that point they are all 'vast majority Muslims'.  But what binds the active and passive ones is Islam.

And that massive elephant  - Islam - is what you all are soooo bloody keen to ignore. Which makes you idiots and mongs.  You must address Islam. It is the root of all evil Islamic deeds.


Islamists do not strike out of no where, Soren.  Islamists take a long road to the point where they are willing to commit violence.    More often than not, it is other Muslims, alarmed at the violent and aggressive turn their friends/relatives have taken that report them, as the revelations after Manchest and London showed.  Unfortunately, all too often their reports are ignored by the authorities.   Perhaps instead of blaming the majority of Muslims you need to look closer to home, the authorities who think that no one represents a threat?   Or is that too hard a concept for you to grasp?

As for the barriers, they are intended to stop Extremists from using vehicles to kill people.   They are not intended to stop individuals.   I suppose, you'd just like to declare that no Muslims are allowed to drive anywhere, now wouldn't you?

Your Islamophobia is sickening, Soren.  Seek help.    Roll Eyes


Extremists are not individuals, eh?  You are stupider than I though and that is saying something!!!!

ISLAM. Brian. It is about Islam. ISLAM rots their minds and makes them do evil thins.


For some Muslims, without a doubt, Soren.  The overwhelming majority though are peaceful, moderate and well assimilated to Western society.   When you realise that, you may be able to discuss Islamism extremism sensibly but until that time your just spouting the same tired old Islamophobia.  You're wasting my time and everybody else's as well.   Roll Eyes

Quote:
You have not decoupled their evil deeds from Islam.  Calling me an Islamophobe is calling me sane under the circumstances.  Who the bloody hell would want to accommodate and tolerate a creed that gives rise to so much evil in the name of Islam?  Apart  from you, that is.

But then you are stupider than anyone could imagine. You have a degree in Stupid Studies.


...

Oh, dearie, dearie, me.  Soren why do you always resort to ad hominem debate when you're losing the argument?  All that does is confirm that you've lost the argument.   You keep attacking me personally, rather than addressing the points I am making.  It's boring and foolish.  Tsk, tsk.
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 49186
Gender: male
Re: Islam - the Left looks away.
Reply #21 - Jul 15th, 2017 at 10:07pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on Jul 15th, 2017 at 9:57pm:
Frank wrote on Jul 15th, 2017 at 9:44pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Jul 15th, 2017 at 9:25pm:
Frank wrote on Jul 15th, 2017 at 9:16pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Jul 15th, 2017 at 7:06pm:
Oh, dearie, dearie, me.  Soren, they aren't "anti-Muslim" barriers.  Muslims are still allowed to walk back and forth, through them.  They are anti-Extremist barriers.   There is a difference in the minds of intelligent people between Muslims and Islamists.   Your Islamophobia blinds you to it, though, doesn't it?  Tsk, tsk.    Roll Eyes


You just can't tell them apart, Muslims and Muslims.  There is no reliable way to tell them apart UNTIL they kill you.  Up to that point they are all 'vast majority Muslims'.  But what binds the active and passive ones is Islam.

And that massive elephant  - Islam - is what you all are soooo bloody keen to ignore. Which makes you idiots and mongs.  You must address Islam. It is the root of all evil Islamic deeds.


Islamists do not strike out of no where, Soren.  Islamists take a long road to the point where they are willing to commit violence.    More often than not, it is other Muslims, alarmed at the violent and aggressive turn their friends/relatives have taken that report them, as the revelations after Manchest and London showed.  Unfortunately, all too often their reports are ignored by the authorities.   Perhaps instead of blaming the majority of Muslims you need to look closer to home, the authorities who think that no one represents a threat?   Or is that too hard a concept for you to grasp?

As for the barriers, they are intended to stop Extremists from using vehicles to kill people.   They are not intended to stop individuals.   I suppose, you'd just like to declare that no Muslims are allowed to drive anywhere, now wouldn't you?

Your Islamophobia is sickening, Soren.  Seek help.    Roll Eyes


Extremists are not individuals, eh?  You are stupider than I though and that is saying something!!!!

ISLAM. Brian. It is about Islam. ISLAM rots their minds and makes them do evil thins.


For some Muslims, without a doubt, Soren.  The overwhelming majority though are peaceful, moderate and well assimilated to Western society.   When you realise that, you may be able to discuss Islamism extremism sensibly but until that time your just spouting the same tired old Islamophobia.  You're wasting my time and everybody else's as well.   Roll Eyes

Quote:
You have not decoupled their evil deeds from Islam.  Calling me an Islamophobe is calling me sane under the circumstances.  Who the bloody hell would want to accommodate and tolerate a creed that gives rise to so much evil in the name of Islam?  Apart  from you, that is.

But then you are stupider than anyone could imagine. You have a degree in Stupid Studies.


http://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/12/128170/2467911-yawn_20smiley.jpg

Oh, dearie, dearie, me.  Soren why do you always resort to ad hominem debate when you're losing the argument?  All that does is confirm that you've lost the argument.   You keep attacking me personally, rather than addressing the points I am making.  It's boring and foolish.  Tsk, tsk.




Soooo - have you decoupled Islam and Muslims?


Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 97320
Re: Islam - the Left looks away.
Reply #22 - Jul 16th, 2017 at 1:06am
 
John Smith wrote on Jul 15th, 2017 at 7:09pm:
Frank wrote on Jul 15th, 2017 at 6:56pm:
The Lefty looneys were poo-pooing the wall Israel had to build to defend itself against Muslim terror.



were they? were you asleep at the time that happened?


Not at all. He was distracted by the invasion of Iraq. The old boy, you see, had a thing with tinted secular dictators.

He's since changed his mind. Now he's going for bearded numpties.

Always absolutely never ever, innit. They keep you on your toes, no?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 97320
Re: Islam - the Left looks away.
Reply #23 - Jul 16th, 2017 at 1:08am
 
Brian Ross wrote on Jul 15th, 2017 at 9:57pm:
Frank wrote on Jul 15th, 2017 at 9:44pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Jul 15th, 2017 at 9:25pm:
Frank wrote on Jul 15th, 2017 at 9:16pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Jul 15th, 2017 at 7:06pm:
Oh, dearie, dearie, me.  Soren, they aren't "anti-Muslim" barriers.  Muslims are still allowed to walk back and forth, through them.  They are anti-Extremist barriers.   There is a difference in the minds of intelligent people between Muslims and Islamists.   Your Islamophobia blinds you to it, though, doesn't it?  Tsk, tsk.    Roll Eyes


You just can't tell them apart, Muslims and Muslims.  There is no reliable way to tell them apart UNTIL they kill you.  Up to that point they are all 'vast majority Muslims'.  But what binds the active and passive ones is Islam.

And that massive elephant  - Islam - is what you all are soooo bloody keen to ignore. Which makes you idiots and mongs.  You must address Islam. It is the root of all evil Islamic deeds.


Islamists do not strike out of no where, Soren.  Islamists take a long road to the point where they are willing to commit violence.    More often than not, it is other Muslims, alarmed at the violent and aggressive turn their friends/relatives have taken that report them, as the revelations after Manchest and London showed.  Unfortunately, all too often their reports are ignored by the authorities.   Perhaps instead of blaming the majority of Muslims you need to look closer to home, the authorities who think that no one represents a threat?   Or is that too hard a concept for you to grasp?

As for the barriers, they are intended to stop Extremists from using vehicles to kill people.   They are not intended to stop individuals.   I suppose, you'd just like to declare that no Muslims are allowed to drive anywhere, now wouldn't you?

Your Islamophobia is sickening, Soren.  Seek help.    Roll Eyes


Extremists are not individuals, eh?  You are stupider than I though and that is saying something!!!!

ISLAM. Brian. It is about Islam. ISLAM rots their minds and makes them do evil thins.


For some Muslims, without a doubt, Soren.  The overwhelming majority though are peaceful, moderate and well assimilated to Western society.   When you realise that, you may be able to discuss Islamism extremism sensibly but until that time your just spouting the same tired old Islamophobia.  You're wasting my time and everybody else's as well.   Roll Eyes

Quote:
You have not decoupled their evil deeds from Islam.  Calling me an Islamophobe is calling me sane under the circumstances.  Who the bloody hell would want to accommodate and tolerate a creed that gives rise to so much evil in the name of Islam?  Apart  from you, that is.

But then you are stupider than anyone could imagine. You have a degree in Stupid Studies.


http://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/12/128170/2467911-yawn_20smiley.jpg

Oh, dearie, dearie, me.  Soren why do you always resort to ad hominem debate when you're losing the argument?  All that does is confirm that you've lost the argument.   You keep attacking me personally, rather than addressing the points I am making.  It's boring and foolish.  Tsk, tsk.


That's right.

You have a PhD, yes?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49765
At my desk.
Re: Islam - the Left looks away.
Reply #24 - Jul 16th, 2017 at 7:20am
 
Brian Ross wrote on Jul 15th, 2017 at 9:25pm:
Frank wrote on Jul 15th, 2017 at 9:16pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Jul 15th, 2017 at 7:06pm:
Oh, dearie, dearie, me.  Soren, they aren't "anti-Muslim" barriers.  Muslims are still allowed to walk back and forth, through them.  They are anti-Extremist barriers.   There is a difference in the minds of intelligent people between Muslims and Islamists.   Your Islamophobia blinds you to it, though, doesn't it?  Tsk, tsk.    Roll Eyes


You just can't tell them apart, Muslims and Muslims.  There is no reliable way to tell them apart UNTIL they kill you.  Up to that point they are all 'vast majority Muslims'.  But what binds the active and passive ones is Islam.

And that massive elephant  - Islam - is what you all are soooo bloody keen to ignore. Which makes you idiots and mongs.  You must address Islam. It is the root of all evil Islamic deeds.


Islamists do not strike out of no where, Soren.  Islamists take a long road to the point where they are willing to commit violence.    More often than not, it is other Muslims, alarmed at the violent and aggressive turn their friends/relatives have taken that report them, as the revelations after Manchest and London showed.  Unfortunately, all too often their reports are ignored by the authorities.   Perhaps instead of blaming the majority of Muslims you need to look closer to home, the authorities who think that no one represents a threat?   Or is that too hard a concept for you to grasp?

As for the barriers, they are intended to stop Extremists from using vehicles to kill people.   They are not intended to stop individuals.   I suppose, you'd just like to declare that no Muslims are allowed to drive anywhere, now wouldn't you?

Your Islamophobia is sickening, Soren.  Seek help.    Roll Eyes


So it is the police's fault for not taking Islamism seriously enough?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Grendel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male
Re: Islam - the Left looks away.
Reply #25 - Jul 16th, 2017 at 10:44am
 
Brian Ross wrote on Jul 15th, 2017 at 9:25pm:
Frank wrote on Jul 15th, 2017 at 9:16pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Jul 15th, 2017 at 7:06pm:
Oh, dearie, dearie, me.  Soren, they aren't "anti-Muslim" barriers.  Muslims are still allowed to walk back and forth, through them.  They are anti-Extremist barriers.   There is a difference in the minds of intelligent people between Muslims and Islamists.   Your Islamophobia blinds you to it, though, doesn't it?  Tsk, tsk.    Roll Eyes


You just can't tell them apart, Muslims and Muslims.  There is no reliable way to tell them apart UNTIL they kill you.  Up to that point they are all 'vast majority Muslims'.  But what binds the active and passive ones is Islam.

And that massive elephant  - Islam - is what you all are soooo bloody keen to ignore. Which makes you idiots and mongs.  You must address Islam. It is the root of all evil Islamic deeds.


Islamists do not strike out of no where, Soren.  Islamists take a long road to the point where they are willing to commit violence.    More often than not, it is other Muslims, alarmed at the violent and aggressive turn their friends/relatives have taken that report them, as the revelations after Manchest and London showed.  Unfortunately, all too often their reports are ignored by the authorities.   Perhaps instead of blaming the majority of Muslims you need to look closer to home, the authorities who think that no one represents a threat?   Or is that too hard a concept for you to grasp?

As for the barriers, they are intended to stop Extremists from using vehicles to kill people.   They are not intended to stop individuals.   I suppose, you'd just like to declare that no Muslims are allowed to drive anywhere, now wouldn't you?

Your Islamophobia is sickening, Soren.  Seek help.    Roll Eyes

What a load of apologist bullshyte bwian... Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 49186
Gender: male
Re: Islam - the Left looks away.
Reply #26 - Jul 16th, 2017 at 3:16pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on Jul 14th, 2017 at 6:19pm:
Frank wrote on Jul 14th, 2017 at 10:33am:
The Left have never been anything but deluded opportunists, always in search of something to destroy.

It's no accident they entered the Nazi-Soviet pact and now are in pact with Islamists. They spawned the Red Brigades and the PLO. Nothing is beyond the pale for them as long as it is the enemy of liberal democracy, the true Great Satan to the ProRegressive Left and to Islamists everywhere.


http://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/12/128170/2467911-yawn_20smiley.jpg

Yeah, sure, Soren, sure, whatever you claim.  Of course, the rest of the world knows you're talking bullshit but, hey, we can always tolerate it when it comes from a known right-wing, neo-Fascist, Islamophobic, racist.  Right?   Roll Eyes


You tick all these boxes, with bells on, Bwian:

Allaholic Frenzy. (1) – “Display of highly agitated behaviour, often in a crowd setting. Can be triggered by almost anything that can be interpreted as disrespectful to Islam, esp. cartoon. Frequently seen in Islamic areas such as Pakistan, Afghanistan and England. Patients suffering from Allaholic Frenzy are advised to be cautious when operating machinery or motor vehicles. References. (1). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 6th Edition: DSM-6.”

Alutheran – “A forward-thinking progressive who thinks a man should be judged by the colour of his skin, not the content of their character, and who is thus supercilious and condescending towards an Alt-Racist.”

Faulty-cultural – “A multi-cultural society gone wrong which tends to occur after importing a backward 7th Century culture incompatible with your societal norms.”

Fauxb/Fauxbia/Fauxbic – “The dishonest and slanderous labelling of an individual who publicly questions the narrative imposed by a self-selected moral elite regarding specific favoured groups which share characteristics such as race, gender, sexual preference, religious or cultural belief. e.g. Homofauxbia, Islamofauxbia. The labelled individual is portrayed as suffering from an irrational fear, akin to a dangerous mental illness, of one or more of the favoured groups, thus consciously separating themselves from the societal ‘norm’ and voluntarily surrendering any rights, protections or privileges. This pathologising of dissent is analogous to the historical concept of outlawry, wherein an individual was legally stripped of the rights enjoyed by fellow citizens as the result of an alleged crime committed by the accused. Said outlaw could be ‘hunted’ using means not otherwise permitted by the contemporary legal system. The Post-Rational branding of an individual as a ‘fauxb’ presently submits them for hunting (by any and all persons who express an interest) in a reputational and social sense only, though Self-Elected Retributive Justice Magistrates (SERJMs, or simply RJMs) aim to progress legislation to the point where the hunting of fellow humans is again sanctioned by society as a whole, or its unelected representatives.”


NTDWI – “Nothing to do with Islam: Description of a terrorist attack in which a perp yelling something in that Arabic people frequently say when going about their normal daily business, and brandishing a black flag which has some common Arabic phrases kills a bunch of people.”

Pollicock – “Political correctness” (remembering ‘poppycock’).

Pollikak – “From Collins English Dictionary – C19 from Dutch dialect ‘pappekak’ literally: soft excrement, from ‘pap’ soft + ‘kak’ dung.”

Pregressive – “A self-righteous, soi disant ultra-modern thinker who takes his agricultural beliefs from 10,000 BC (pre-farming), social policies from 3000 BC (pre-family groups), marital policies from 1500 BC (pre-Mosaic monogamy), science and technological ideas from 1700 AD (pre-industrial revolution) and economic guidance from 1860 (Marx).

Tollerance – “The heavy monetary and social price Western countries have to pay in order to ‘enjoy’ the ‘benefits’ of multiculturalism.”

Triggs Point – “The realisation that after broadcasting your contempt for someone in the left media for days that you have completely forgotten the facts of the matter.”

Tuppitude – “Sexual intercourse involving sheeple.”

Two-bagger – “Your typical leftist/SJW who is as repulsive in the outside as they are on the inside and thus during tuppitude require two paper bags over the head in case the first one falls off.”

VisOrama – Panoramic Virtue Signalling (anything from the environment to sexuality to electing a black, Marxist homo as president).

Youthajism – “The smug, satisfactory feeling achieved by SJW students as they march, chant and ejaculate meaningless slogans and platitude. Often used as a substitute for the fact that SJWs are largely incapable of getting laid, or if they are then it’s with a two-bagger.”

Zyx – “The politically-correct form of ‘Dude.’ i.e. ‘Zyx, check out the pair on that one!”
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 43087
Re: Islam - the Left looks away.
Reply #27 - Jul 16th, 2017 at 6:44pm
 
Frank wrote on Jul 15th, 2017 at 10:07pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Jul 15th, 2017 at 9:57pm:
Frank wrote on Jul 15th, 2017 at 9:44pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Jul 15th, 2017 at 9:25pm:
Frank wrote on Jul 15th, 2017 at 9:16pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Jul 15th, 2017 at 7:06pm:
Oh, dearie, dearie, me.  Soren, they aren't "anti-Muslim" barriers.  Muslims are still allowed to walk back and forth, through them.  They are anti-Extremist barriers.   There is a difference in the minds of intelligent people between Muslims and Islamists.   Your Islamophobia blinds you to it, though, doesn't it?  Tsk, tsk.    Roll Eyes


You just can't tell them apart, Muslims and Muslims.  There is no reliable way to tell them apart UNTIL they kill you.  Up to that point they are all 'vast majority Muslims'.  But what binds the active and passive ones is Islam.

And that massive elephant  - Islam - is what you all are soooo bloody keen to ignore. Which makes you idiots and mongs.  You must address Islam. It is the root of all evil Islamic deeds.


Islamists do not strike out of no where, Soren.  Islamists take a long road to the point where they are willing to commit violence.    More often than not, it is other Muslims, alarmed at the violent and aggressive turn their friends/relatives have taken that report them, as the revelations after Manchest and London showed.  Unfortunately, all too often their reports are ignored by the authorities.   Perhaps instead of blaming the majority of Muslims you need to look closer to home, the authorities who think that no one represents a threat?   Or is that too hard a concept for you to grasp?

As for the barriers, they are intended to stop Extremists from using vehicles to kill people.   They are not intended to stop individuals.   I suppose, you'd just like to declare that no Muslims are allowed to drive anywhere, now wouldn't you?

Your Islamophobia is sickening, Soren.  Seek help.    Roll Eyes


Extremists are not individuals, eh?  You are stupider than I though and that is saying something!!!!

ISLAM. Brian. It is about Islam. ISLAM rots their minds and makes them do evil thins.


For some Muslims, without a doubt, Soren.  The overwhelming majority though are peaceful, moderate and well assimilated to Western society.   When you realise that, you may be able to discuss Islamism extremism sensibly but until that time your just spouting the same tired old Islamophobia.  You're wasting my time and everybody else's as well.   Roll Eyes

Quote:
You have not decoupled their evil deeds from Islam.  Calling me an Islamophobe is calling me sane under the circumstances.  Who the bloody hell would want to accommodate and tolerate a creed that gives rise to so much evil in the name of Islam?  Apart  from you, that is.

But then you are stupider than anyone could imagine. You have a degree in Stupid Studies.


http://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/12/128170/2467911-yawn_20smiley.jpg

Oh, dearie, dearie, me.  Soren why do you always resort to ad hominem debate when you're losing the argument?  All that does is confirm that you've lost the argument.   You keep attacking me personally, rather than addressing the points I am making.  It's boring and foolish.  Tsk, tsk.


Soooo - have you decoupled Islam and Muslims?


Nope.   However, I recognise there are different types of Muslims.  You claim all Muslims are the same, their beliefs are identical, they are all Terrorists.   In reality, they are a mixed lot, just like Christians/Hindus/Jews/etc.   Most are good, some are bad.   You make no effort to differentiate.   To you, they are all just "Muslims".   Tsk, tsk.    Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 43087
Re: Islam - the Left looks away.
Reply #28 - Jul 16th, 2017 at 6:50pm
 
Frank wrote on Jul 16th, 2017 at 3:16pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Jul 14th, 2017 at 6:19pm:
Frank wrote on Jul 14th, 2017 at 10:33am:
The Left have never been anything but deluded opportunists, always in search of something to destroy.

It's no accident they entered the Nazi-Soviet pact and now are in pact with Islamists. They spawned the Red Brigades and the PLO. Nothing is beyond the pale for them as long as it is the enemy of liberal democracy, the true Great Satan to the ProRegressive Left and to Islamists everywhere.


http://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/12/128170/2467911-yawn_20smiley.jpg

Yeah, sure, Soren, sure, whatever you claim.  Of course, the rest of the world knows you're talking bullshit but, hey, we can always tolerate it when it comes from a known right-wing, neo-Fascist, Islamophobic, racist.  Right?   Roll Eyes


You tick all these boxes, with bells on, Bwian:

Allaholic Frenzy. (1) – “Display of highly agitated behaviour, often in a crowd setting. Can be triggered by almost anything that can be interpreted as disrespectful to Islam, esp. cartoon. Frequently seen in Islamic areas such as Pakistan, Afghanistan and England. Patients suffering from Allaholic Frenzy are advised to be cautious when operating machinery or motor vehicles. References. (1). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 6th Edition: DSM-6.”

Alutheran – “A forward-thinking progressive who thinks a man should be judged by the colour of his skin, not the content of their character, and who is thus supercilious and condescending towards an Alt-Racist.”

Faulty-cultural – “A multi-cultural society gone wrong which tends to occur after importing a backward 7th Century culture incompatible with your societal norms.”

Fauxb/Fauxbia/Fauxbic – “The dishonest and slanderous labelling of an individual who publicly questions the narrative imposed by a self-selected moral elite regarding specific favoured groups which share characteristics such as race, gender, sexual preference, religious or cultural belief. e.g. Homofauxbia, Islamofauxbia. The labelled individual is portrayed as suffering from an irrational fear, akin to a dangerous mental illness, of one or more of the favoured groups, thus consciously separating themselves from the societal ‘norm’ and voluntarily surrendering any rights, protections or privileges. This pathologising of dissent is analogous to the historical concept of outlawry, wherein an individual was legally stripped of the rights enjoyed by fellow citizens as the result of an alleged crime committed by the accused. Said outlaw could be ‘hunted’ using means not otherwise permitted by the contemporary legal system. The Post-Rational branding of an individual as a ‘fauxb’ presently submits them for hunting (by any and all persons who express an interest) in a reputational and social sense only, though Self-Elected Retributive Justice Magistrates (SERJMs, or simply RJMs) aim to progress legislation to the point where the hunting of fellow humans is again sanctioned by society as a whole, or its unelected representatives.”


NTDWI – “Nothing to do with Islam: Description of a terrorist attack in which a perp yelling something in that Arabic people frequently say when going about their normal daily business, and brandishing a black flag which has some common Arabic phrases kills a bunch of people.”

Pollicock – “Political correctness” (remembering ‘poppycock’).

Pollikak – “From Collins English Dictionary – C19 from Dutch dialect ‘pappekak’ literally: soft excrement, from ‘pap’ soft + ‘kak’ dung.”

Pregressive – “A self-righteous, soi disant ultra-modern thinker who takes his agricultural beliefs from 10,000 BC (pre-farming), social policies from 3000 BC (pre-family groups), marital policies from 1500 BC (pre-Mosaic monogamy), science and technological ideas from 1700 AD (pre-industrial revolution) and economic guidance from 1860 (Marx).

Tollerance – “The heavy monetary and social price Western countries have to pay in order to ‘enjoy’ the ‘benefits’ of multiculturalism.”

Triggs Point – “The realisation that after broadcasting your contempt for someone in the left media for days that you have completely forgotten the facts of the matter.”

Tuppitude – “Sexual intercourse involving sheeple.”

Two-bagger – “Your typical leftist/SJW who is as repulsive in the outside as they are on the inside and thus during tuppitude require two paper bags over the head in case the first one falls off.”

VisOrama – Panoramic Virtue Signalling (anything from the environment to sexuality to electing a black, Marxist homo as president).

Youthajism – “The smug, satisfactory feeling achieved by SJW students as they march, chant and ejaculate meaningless slogans and platitude. Often used as a substitute for the fact that SJWs are largely incapable of getting laid, or if they are then it’s with a two-bagger.”

Zyx – “The politically-correct form of ‘Dude.’ i.e. ‘Zyx, check out the pair on that one!”


Oh, dear, oh, dearie, me.  Stealing other people's ideas, Soren? Tsk, tsk, plagarism.   Roll Eyes  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 49186
Gender: male
Re: Islam - the Left looks away.
Reply #29 - Jul 16th, 2017 at 8:32pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on Jul 16th, 2017 at 6:50pm:
Frank wrote on Jul 16th, 2017 at 3:16pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Jul 14th, 2017 at 6:19pm:
Frank wrote on Jul 14th, 2017 at 10:33am:
The Left have never been anything but deluded opportunists, always in search of something to destroy.

It's no accident they entered the Nazi-Soviet pact and now are in pact with Islamists. They spawned the Red Brigades and the PLO. Nothing is beyond the pale for them as long as it is the enemy of liberal democracy, the true Great Satan to the ProRegressive Left and to Islamists everywhere.


http://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/12/128170/2467911-yawn_20smiley.jpg

Yeah, sure, Soren, sure, whatever you claim.  Of course, the rest of the world knows you're talking bullshit but, hey, we can always tolerate it when it comes from a known right-wing, neo-Fascist, Islamophobic, racist.  Right?   Roll Eyes


You tick all these boxes, with bells on, Bwian:

Allaholic Frenzy. (1) – “Display of highly agitated behaviour, often in a crowd setting. Can be triggered by almost anything that can be interpreted as disrespectful to Islam, esp. cartoon. Frequently seen in Islamic areas such as Pakistan, Afghanistan and England. Patients suffering from Allaholic Frenzy are advised to be cautious when operating machinery or motor vehicles. References. (1). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 6th Edition: DSM-6.”

Alutheran – “A forward-thinking progressive who thinks a man should be judged by the colour of his skin, not the content of their character, and who is thus supercilious and condescending towards an Alt-Racist.”

Faulty-cultural – “A multi-cultural society gone wrong which tends to occur after importing a backward 7th Century culture incompatible with your societal norms.”

Fauxb/Fauxbia/Fauxbic – “The dishonest and slanderous labelling of an individual who publicly questions the narrative imposed by a self-selected moral elite regarding specific favoured groups which share characteristics such as race, gender, sexual preference, religious or cultural belief. e.g. Homofauxbia, Islamofauxbia. The labelled individual is portrayed as suffering from an irrational fear, akin to a dangerous mental illness, of one or more of the favoured groups, thus consciously separating themselves from the societal ‘norm’ and voluntarily surrendering any rights, protections or privileges. This pathologising of dissent is analogous to the historical concept of outlawry, wherein an individual was legally stripped of the rights enjoyed by fellow citizens as the result of an alleged crime committed by the accused. Said outlaw could be ‘hunted’ using means not otherwise permitted by the contemporary legal system. The Post-Rational branding of an individual as a ‘fauxb’ presently submits them for hunting (by any and all persons who express an interest) in a reputational and social sense only, though Self-Elected Retributive Justice Magistrates (SERJMs, or simply RJMs) aim to progress legislation to the point where the hunting of fellow humans is again sanctioned by society as a whole, or its unelected representatives.”


NTDWI – “Nothing to do with Islam: Description of a terrorist attack in which a perp yelling something in that Arabic people frequently say when going about their normal daily business, and brandishing a black flag which has some common Arabic phrases kills a bunch of people.”

Pollicock – “Political correctness” (remembering ‘poppycock’).

Pollikak – “From Collins English Dictionary – C19 from Dutch dialect ‘pappekak’ literally: soft excrement, from ‘pap’ soft + ‘kak’ dung.”

Pregressive – “A self-righteous, soi disant ultra-modern thinker who takes his agricultural beliefs from 10,000 BC (pre-farming), social policies from 3000 BC (pre-family groups), marital policies from 1500 BC (pre-Mosaic monogamy), science and technological ideas from 1700 AD (pre-industrial revolution) and economic guidance from 1860 (Marx).

Tollerance – “The heavy monetary and social price Western countries have to pay in order to ‘enjoy’ the ‘benefits’ of multiculturalism.”

Triggs Point – “The realisation that after broadcasting your contempt for someone in the left media for days that you have completely forgotten the facts of the matter.”

Tuppitude – “Sexual intercourse involving sheeple.”

Two-bagger – “Your typical leftist/SJW who is as repulsive in the outside as they are on the inside and thus during tuppitude require two paper bags over the head in case the first one falls off.”

VisOrama – Panoramic Virtue Signalling (anything from the environment to sexuality to electing a black, Marxist homo as president).

Youthajism – “The smug, satisfactory feeling achieved by SJW students as they march, chant and ejaculate meaningless slogans and platitude. Often used as a substitute for the fact that SJWs are largely incapable of getting laid, or if they are then it’s with a two-bagger.”

Zyx – “The politically-correct form of ‘Dude.’ i.e. ‘Zyx, check out the pair on that one!”


Oh, dear, oh, dearie, me.  Stealing other people's ideas, Soren? Tsk, tsk, plagarism.   Roll Eyes  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes



You sack of pollikak.
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 ... 19
Send Topic Print