____ wrote on Jul 29
th, 2017 at 8:24am:
BigOl64 wrote on Jul 29
th, 2017 at 8:09am:
____ wrote on Jul 29
th, 2017 at 7:59am:
A broad nasty stick approach effects the moderate religionists. The ones focused on effecting positive outcomes.
We just have to eradicate the criminal conservatives, so to protect the children.
So what, we do that all the time, it is how we run our country.
Why should religious criminals be protected with special rights?
If they are good people they don't need 116, they will survive this country's laws just like everyone else does.
The rest of us live our lives without basic rights, so fkk the religious scum, let them be like the rest of us.
Your run homeless shelters ?
You don't need to be a deluded religious nut with special rights to run a homel;ess shelter do you?
You can be a normal person or even a religious nut without special rights and be quite successful. No need to hide your crimes behind a special right no-one else has do you?
Taking away a criminal organisation's special rights that no-one else has is not wrong, at leats not in a sane world.
Peados are allowed to flourish under the church's special right to sealed confession, no other organisation is allowed to facilitate a vile and reprehensible crime in this manner, why should the catholic church or any religious organisation
What about hate speech, is it okay if it is from the pulpit?
Not paying taxes on massive profits, not a problem if you believe in a fkken shy fairy and refuse to accept the reality of science.
Socialist are all about everyone especially the rich paying their fair share, why not religious scum?