You want PROOF of what constitutes Terrorism? Well here is PROOF according to the Attorney General's Depart    Australian Federal Government:-

Terrorist act offences
and how they apply
Australia’s terrorist act offences are contained in
the Criminal Code Act 1995.

What is a terrorist act?

A ‘terrorist act’ is an act, or a threat to commit
an act, that is done with the intention to coerce
or influence the public or any government by
intimidation to advance a political, religious or
ideological cause, and the act causes:
 death, serious harm or endangers a person
 serious damage to property
 a serious risk to the health or safety of the
public, or
 seriously interferes with, disrupts or
destroys critical infrastructure such as a
telecommunications or electricity network.
A terrorist act does not cover engaging in advocacy,
protest, dissent or industrial action where a person
does not have the intention to urge force or violence
or cause harm to others.
If found guilty of committing a terrorist act, a
person could face up to life imprisonment.
What is a terrorist act offence?
The terrorist act offences mean it is an offence to:
 commit a terrorist act
 plan or prepare for a terrorist act
 finance terrorism or a terrorist
 provide or receive training connected with
terrorist acts
 possess things connected with terrorist acts, or
 collect or make documents likely to facilitate
terrorist acts.
A person may be convicted of a terrorist act
offence if the person intends to commit one of
these offences or if the person was reckless as
to whether his or her actions would amount to a
terrorist act.
For example, a person may be found guilty of a
terrorist act offence where the person intentionally
prepared or planned the commission of a
terrorist act but did not actually commit the
terrorist act themselves.
A person may still commit a terrorist act offence
even though a terrorist act did not occur.
What does it mean to have an intention
to do something or to be reckless about
something?
A person has intention with respect to conduct if he
or she means to engage in that conduct. A person
has intention with respect to a circumstance if he
or she believes that it exists or will exist. A person
has intention with respect to a result if he or she
means to bring it about or is aware that it will occur
in the ordinary course of events.
A person is reckless with respect to a result or a
circumstance if the person is aware of a substantial
risk that the result or circumstance will exist and
having regard to the circumstances known to the
person, it is unjustifiable to take the risk.

*Lesson over Gregg

bump

red baron wrote on Aug 3^rd, 2017 at 11:11am:


And nobody has called it a terrorist event.

It's a mass murder.

"The majority of terrorist attacks in Australia, have been carried out by non-Muslims.

"The same goes for mass murders."

See: I was right.

Now you just need to accept the truth.

Bobby. wrote on Aug 3^rd, 2017 at 11:51am:


The majority of terrorist attacks in Australia, have been carried out by non-Muslims.

The same goes for mass murders.

Did you know that, Booby?

You're either with us, or you're with Martin Bryant.

You decide.

Bobby. wrote on Aug 3^rd, 2017 at 11:55am:


Foiled?

So, nothing actually happened - is that what you're telling me, Booby?

13 Muslim attacks did NOT happen, and the majority of mass murders and terrorist attacks that HAVE occurred in Australia have been carried out by non-Muslims - is that what you're saying?

miketrees wrote on Aug 3^rd, 2017 at 12:59pm:




What should the peoples court do?

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 3^rd, 2017 at 12:00pm:


Booby, you didn't answer.

Terrorists like it very much when there is division between Muslims and everyone else.


So we should comply and just blow ourselves up