miketrees wrote on Aug 3^rd, 2017 at 1:29pm:


Have you ever talked with someone about your impulse control issues regarding your propensity to make absurd and fanciful leaps of logic?

There is a tremendous amount of that on here.

Your version  of the truth is crap..this is about Terrorism..the subject is Terrorism...not a list of Australia's most famour murderers

We are talking about what constitutes the greatest risk ever to western countries

We are talking about I.S.I.S. and the followers of I.S.I.S. and what acts of terrorism or attempted acts of terrorism they have and are carrying out

At least Gregg that is what I'm talking about, stop trying to muddy the waters with irrelevant themes

As one who has spent many hours in airport security lines, duty fully removing items of clothing to satisfy sometimes over zealous security staff, I was very concerned today to learn that some workers at airports (cleaners etc) do not pass through security to get into the Airport.   What is the sense of that!

Bobby. wrote on Aug 3^rd, 2017 at 11:55am:

Police have 2 days to charge the current three detainees.

Meanwhile, the plot keeps changing from an explosive sausage grinder to poison gas to an explosive device and a mule.

Garbologists have confirmed to police that the evidence police retrieved from the garbage did not pass the sniff test.

The case will not proceed if police cannot induce an erection from Magistrate Skippy.

The principal witness denizen Gordon was last seen running from plod on a Perth beach.

Are you really that thick Gregg, you're like a needle stuck in an old wax record...

How about you re read this Gregg because it clearly states what a terrorist act is and the circumstances surrounding them:


Terrorist act offences
and how they apply
Australia’s terrorist act offences are contained in
the Criminal Code Act 1995.

What is a terrorist act?

A ‘terrorist act’ is an act, or a threat to commit
an act, that is done with the intention to coerce
or influence the public or any government by
intimidation to advance a political, religious or
ideological cause, and the act causes:
 death, serious harm or endangers a person
 serious damage to property
 a serious risk to the health or safety of the
public, or
 seriously interferes with, disrupts or
destroys critical infrastructure such as a
telecommunications or electricity network.
A terrorist act does not cover engaging in advocacy,
protest, dissent or industrial action where a person
does not have the intention to urge force or violence
or cause harm to others.
If found guilty of committing a terrorist act, a
person could face up to life imprisonment.
What is a terrorist act offence?
The terrorist act offences mean it is an offence to:
 commit a terrorist act
 plan or prepare for a terrorist act
 finance terrorism or a terrorist
 provide or receive training connected with
terrorist acts
 possess things connected with terrorist acts, or
 collect or make documents likely to facilitate
terrorist acts.
A person may be convicted of a terrorist act
offence if the person intends to commit one of
these offences or if the person was reckless as
to whether his or her actions would amount to a
terrorist act.
For example, a person may be found guilty of a
terrorist act offence where the person intentionally
prepared or planned the commission of a
terrorist act but did not actually commit the
terrorist act themselves.
A person may still commit a terrorist act offence
even though a terrorist act did not occur.
What does it mean to have an intention
to do something or to be reckless about
something?
A person has intention with respect to conduct if he
or she means to engage in that conduct. A person
has intention with respect to a circumstance if he
or she believes that it exists or will exist. A person
has intention with respect to a result if he or she
means to bring it about or is aware that it will occur
in the ordinary course of events.
A person is reckless with respect to a result or a
circumstance if the person is aware of a substantial
risk that the result or circumstance will exist and
having regard to the circumstances known to the
person, it is unjustifiable to take the risk.

*Lesson over Gregg


 

red baron wrote on Aug 3^rd, 2017 at 6:34pm:


Yes.

And the vast majority of terrorist attacks in Australia have been carried out by non-Muslims.

You seem reluctant to accept this fact.

Why is that?