Karnal
|
greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 2 nd, 2017 at 4:06pm: BigOl64 wrote on Aug 2 nd, 2017 at 4:00pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 2 nd, 2017 at 3:49pm: BigOl64 wrote on Aug 2 nd, 2017 at 3:42pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 2 nd, 2017 at 3:33pm: BigOl64 wrote on Aug 2 nd, 2017 at 3:32pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 2 nd, 2017 at 3:24pm: BigOl64 wrote on Aug 2 nd, 2017 at 3:17pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 2 nd, 2017 at 3:09pm: BigOl64 wrote on Aug 2 nd, 2017 at 2:35pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 2 nd, 2017 at 2:21pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 2 nd, 2017 at 1:35pm: BigOl64 wrote on Aug 2 nd, 2017 at 1:23pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 2 nd, 2017 at 1:17pm: BigOl64 wrote on Aug 2 nd, 2017 at 8:01am: But since it isn't a right, we can easily make a nice little law and ban that sh1t for 'safety' reasons. What 'safety reasons'? You want to what safety reason the government is using to ban the burka do you? You do know the difference between reality and hypothetical don't you? Now as I said before I personally wouldn't ban the burka I would ban the religion that causes these violent sociopaths from existing. But Im not the government am I, you do know that too don't you? Your exact words: "1. wearing a burka was not a right
"2. That it can be legislated against
"3. It can be justified for 'safety reasons'
"all of which is true".So, if it's true that it can be justified for safety reasons, what are those reasons? BigHole - the reasons? My reasons or the governments reasons? The government's reasons. You said: "1. wearing a burka was not a right
"2. That it can be legislated against
"3. It can be justified for 'safety reasons'
"all of which is true".So, if it's true, what safety reasons will the government cite? You must know the reasons, if you know it's true. So ... ? Do you believe that I am the government or That the government ensures I am privy to the governments reasons for doing stuff I am seriously interested in you mental health at this stage, because if you are wandering out side it would be good time to know the level of you delusions. So which is it loon? Your exact words: "1. wearing a burka was not a right
"2. That it can be legislated against
"3. It can be justified for 'safety reasons'
"all of which is true".So, if you know that it's true that the government can legislate against the burka for safety reasons, you must know what those safety reasons are. Could you please share them with the rest of the forum? Thank you. No Ah. So you lied. No Yes, you most certainly did. You said it was true that the government can legislate against the burka for safety reasons, yet you can't provide those reasons. If you know it's true, you must know what those safety reasons are. Naughty boy. Take your flogging and get mummy to give you a hug, you're done for the day. The lesson you've learned today: don't tell lies. "safety reasons" Oh, Hole will forget that one pretty quick. Back in the army, we knew how to teach these types. You need to insert it in their muscle memory, so to speak. Big Hole knows the method.
|