Auggie wrote on Aug 1
st, 2017 at 10:24pm:
Gordon wrote on Aug 1
st, 2017 at 10:18pm:
Auggie wrote on Aug 1
st, 2017 at 10:13pm:
Gordon wrote on Aug 1
st, 2017 at 10:07pm:
In think you're missing the point that we DO pick and choose who comes here. A few years ago hairdressers were high on the skills list, to the detriment of nail artists?
I actually think that the whole skills shortage list is not a good policy, but that's another issue.
It's one thing to discriminate based on occupation; quite another to discriminate based on beliefs.
When a belief is so strong that it makes it holder act like they're living 1000 years in the past, we have the right to question if they're the right fit for our country.
I doubt you'd invite a fundy wahabist into your home, we just scale it up. Australia is home. Believe it or not, Gordie, I would actually invite him into my home, and engage in discussion with him: provided that he comes in peace, and leaves in peace.
Only to satisfy your curiosity.
Let me put this another way. I've picked a stock or two in my days and I'm not too shabby at it.
Imigration balance needs to be treated like a share portfolio with the emphasis on low risk.
As you know not all cultures are equal because a culture is essentially a collection of ideas, and on balance some are better than others.
Muslims have way too many downsides, particularly when there are so many more low risk options.
Remember, this can't be undone in the future.
We should cease Muslim immigration until the census shows its less than 1% and or when there is a lurch towards modernity and secularism in the middle east.
On that I won't hold my breath.