Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
Laurie Oaks (Read 1274 times)
Lord Herbert
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 34441
Gender: male
Re: Laurie Oaks
Reply #15 - Aug 3rd, 2017 at 9:27pm
 
Dnarever wrote on Aug 3rd, 2017 at 9:09pm:
Lord Herbert wrote on Aug 3rd, 2017 at 8:44pm:
Laurie Oaks has been a typically biassed Leftwing Media stooge for the Labor Parties ever since he first put pen to paper.





Rubbish. He has never expressed a political view for either side in his reporting.



That would make him utterly unique.

With all of these political commentators it's not long before their egos take over from simply delivering a non-partisan and impartial viewpoint. They simply can't help themselves, and it's not long before their biasses appear in their writings and commentary - and Laurie Oaks is no exception.

"Of Newspaper journalists, Andrew Bolt (3.5%) was most often mentioned by Australians as being often biased, followed by Piers Ackerman (3%) and Miranda Devine (1.5%). Ray Martin (6%) and Kerry O’Brien (4.5%) were the most frequently mentioned TV reporters or journalists who were often biased, along with Laurie Oakes (2%) and Richard Carlton (1%).

link

Andrew Bolt and Piers Ackerman are media commentators who deal in opinion and personal viewpoint ~ that's their trade. But then we have the likes of Kerry O'Brien and Laurie Oakes who have always presented themselves as journalists whose business was all about delivering the news without prejudice or bias, and so the percentages in the Morgan Poll is a lot more damning of these 'journalists' than it is of the commentators.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Francis
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 595
Gender: female
Re: Laurie Oaks
Reply #16 - Aug 4th, 2017 at 9:22pm
 
I found  him fair and his work interesting.  Sad his finished  but wish him a long and happy  retirement.

Who will  replace him?
Back to top
 

No tenemos miedo!
 
IP Logged
 
Gordon
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20561
Gordon
Gender: male
Re: Laurie Oaks
Reply #17 - Aug 4th, 2017 at 9:31pm
 
Oaks is alright by me, politically centrist and goes after everybody.
Back to top
 

IBI
 
IP Logged
 
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 58358
Here
Gender: male
Re: Laurie Oaks
Reply #18 - Aug 4th, 2017 at 10:35pm
 
Lord Herbert wrote on Aug 3rd, 2017 at 9:27pm:
Dnarever wrote on Aug 3rd, 2017 at 9:09pm:
Lord Herbert wrote on Aug 3rd, 2017 at 8:44pm:
Laurie Oaks has been a typically biassed Leftwing Media stooge for the Labor Parties ever since he first put pen to paper.





Rubbish. He has never expressed a political view for either side in his reporting.



That would make him utterly unique.

With all of these political commentators it's not long before their egos take over from simply delivering a non-partisan and impartial viewpoint. They simply can't help themselves, and it's not long before their biasses appear in their writings and commentary - and Laurie Oaks is no exception.

"Of Newspaper journalists, Andrew Bolt (3.5%) was most often mentioned by Australians as being often biased, followed by Piers Ackerman (3%) and Miranda Devine (1.5%). Ray Martin (6%) and Kerry O’Brien (4.5%) were the most frequently mentioned TV reporters or journalists who were often biased, along with Laurie Oakes (2%) and Richard Carlton (1%).

link

Andrew Bolt and Piers Ackerman are media commentators who deal in opinion and personal viewpoint ~ that's their trade. But then we have the likes of Kerry O'Brien and Laurie Oakes who have always presented themselves as journalists whose business was all about delivering the news without prejudice or bias, and so the percentages in the Morgan Poll is a lot more damning of these 'journalists' than it is of the commentators.


Really dumb poll with obviously flawed results.

Herbert says that he was left wing but most who complain about him say he is the other way. He was certainly on board with Howard and nobody spread more stories about Rudd and Gillard ?
Back to top
« Last Edit: Aug 5th, 2017 at 9:21pm by Dnarever »  
 
IP Logged
 
miketrees
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6490
Gender: male
Re: Laurie Oaks
Reply #19 - Aug 5th, 2017 at 9:05am
 



Oaks retired!

I thought the old coont died already
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Lord Herbert
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 34441
Gender: male
Re: Laurie Oaks
Reply #20 - Aug 5th, 2017 at 12:37pm
 
Francis wrote on Aug 4th, 2017 at 9:22pm:
I found  him fair and his work interesting.  Sad his finished  but wish him a long and happy  retirement.

Who will  replace him?



Hopefully, somebody not of the Left.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Rider
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2669
OnTheRoad
Gender: male
Re: Laurie Oaks
Reply #21 - Aug 5th, 2017 at 8:34pm
 
Lord Herbert wrote on Aug 5th, 2017 at 12:37pm:
Francis wrote on Aug 4th, 2017 at 9:22pm:
I found  him fair and his work interesting.  Sad his finished  but wish him a long and happy  retirement.

Who will  replace him?



Hopefully, somebody not of the Left.


Thats kinda impossible as the left are entrenched in media and all other forms of blood sucking tax squandering environments.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Rider
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2669
OnTheRoad
Gender: male
Re: Laurie Oaks
Reply #22 - Aug 5th, 2017 at 8:38pm
 
Dnarever wrote on Aug 3rd, 2017 at 9:09pm:
Lord Herbert wrote on Aug 3rd, 2017 at 8:44pm:
Laurie Oaks has been a typically biassed Leftwing Media stooge for the Labor Parties ever since he first put pen to paper.





Rubbish. He has never expressed a political view for either side in his reporting.




Anyone with a functioning brain cell knows he's just another ugly bloated leftard.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 58358
Here
Gender: male
Re: Laurie Oaks
Reply #23 - Aug 5th, 2017 at 9:22pm
 
Lord Herbert wrote on Aug 5th, 2017 at 12:37pm:
Francis wrote on Aug 4th, 2017 at 9:22pm:
I found  him fair and his work interesting.  Sad his finished  but wish him a long and happy  retirement.

Who will  replace him?



Hopefully, somebody not of the Left.


He sais himself that he has voted Labor and Liberal at different times and that he does not like journalists who show a personal bias in their work.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 58358
Here
Gender: male
Re: Laurie Oaks
Reply #24 - Aug 5th, 2017 at 9:24pm
 
Rider wrote on Aug 5th, 2017 at 8:38pm:
Dnarever wrote on Aug 3rd, 2017 at 9:09pm:
Lord Herbert wrote on Aug 3rd, 2017 at 8:44pm:
Laurie Oaks has been a typically biassed Leftwing Media stooge for the Labor Parties ever since he first put pen to paper.





Rubbish. He has never expressed a political view for either side in his reporting.




Anyone with a functioning brain cell knows he's just another ugly bloated leftard.


Yet the majority who complain about him consider him just another ugly bloated rightard.

The truth is that he printed negative stories about both.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Lord Herbert
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 34441
Gender: male
Re: Laurie Oaks
Reply #25 - Aug 5th, 2017 at 9:24pm
 
Dnarever wrote on Aug 5th, 2017 at 9:22pm:
He says himself that he has voted Labor and Liberal at different times and that he does not like journalists who show a personal bias in their work.


That has to count in his favour.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print