Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Poll Poll
Question: Are you voting

Yes    
  18 (45.0%)
No    
  14 (35.0%)
Dont care    
  8 (20.0%)




Total votes: 40
« Last Modified by: Its time on: Aug 8th, 2017 at 9:19pm »

Pages: 1 ... 17 18 19 20 21 ... 30
Send Topic Print
VOTE NO!!!!! (Read 26177 times)
Neferti
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 7965
Canberra
Gender: female
Re: VOTE NO!!!!!
Reply #270 - Aug 9th, 2017 at 4:43pm
 
John Smith wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 3:29pm:
cods wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 3:13pm:
now we will have a postal.. god give us strength..$122mil... and thats what they tell us...


you realise that the pleb if it had passed the senate would have cost $180mil? right?
(ohh, and welcome back)
  Cheesy Cheesy


What was The Government going to use the Aussie MasterCard, if not for this SSM nonsense. Huh?  Free stuff for asylum seekers? Grin Or building FREE homes for the homeless in Martin Place?  Roll Eyes

I think it is about time that EVERYBODY got off their arses and stopped depending on The Government.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Auggie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


The Bull Moose

Posts: 8571
Re: VOTE NO!!!!!
Reply #271 - Aug 9th, 2017 at 5:05pm
 
mothra wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 3:12pm:
Auggie wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 3:09pm:
mothra wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 3:03pm:
Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 2:59pm:
mothra wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 2:49pm:
Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 2:49pm:
mothra wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 2:44pm:
Hammer, if i have sex with a woman, am i automatically a lesbian?

And if so, am i only a lesbian for the duration of our love-making?



I take it you're using the example of yourself as a woman who has only had sex with men up to that point?


Then obviously, you're bisexual.

If you like.




No. I'm not. I'm very heterosexual. But i have had sex with women.


That's very strange, Mothra. I'm heterosexual but I have never considered nor would ever consider having sex with another male (or a female, if you believe as Aussie does that I'm woman).


Not so strange, Augie. Not at all uncommon for people to have had same sex encounters throughout their life that they are not defined by.

I have no hang-ups about sex.


I think you'll find that it's very rare. I know of no person who has had such 'encounters'.
Back to top
 

The Progressive President
 
IP Logged
 
Auggie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


The Bull Moose

Posts: 8571
Re: VOTE NO!!!!!
Reply #272 - Aug 9th, 2017 at 5:07pm
 
Hammer's silence on this issue indicates that he is stumped by his BS regarding 'sexuality is not biological' or that 'sexuality isn't relevant' until you've had sex.

He's using leftard arguments to propagate his own right-wing agenda.

Hahahaha....  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

The Progressive President
 
IP Logged
 
Auggie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


The Bull Moose

Posts: 8571
Re: VOTE NO!!!!!
Reply #273 - Aug 9th, 2017 at 5:08pm
 
BigOl64 wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 3:11pm:
Auggie wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 2:58pm:
BigOl64 wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 2:56pm:
Auggie wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 2:41pm:
BigOl64 wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 2:39pm:
[ftp][/ftp]Auggie wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 2:31pm:
BigOl64 wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 2:28pm:
The poll seems rather odd

The OP is about voting 'no' for the homo thing, but the poll only asks if you are going to vote yes or no and if you care about voting, not about voting for the homo thing.


Now obviously I don't vote for mindless horse sh1t reasons, so I said no, but I also don't care.


Should I change my vote?


Well, what your opinion on the 'homo thing' to use your brusque and uneducated terminology?




I truly cannot must a single fkk to give, nothing to do with me; don't care.


Mind you anything that stops a whinging minority form whinging about some bullsh1t or other, sometimes is not a bad thing. But they actually have to stop whinging.



So, if Chinese teenagers were being captured a sold into slavery, should they stop winging because it's 'only a minority?'

Your complete disregard for basic human rights and liberties is shocking.

Almost akin to the attitudes of Islamofascists.....



That is seriously the most fkken stupid analogy any of you fkkheaded socialist have every presented to counter one of my posts.  Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin



Not giving a fkk, is not giving a fkk, nothing more than that you hysterical fkken loon.


But if you want I could just pick the no side, for sh1ts and giggles, but that would mean i would have to register with the AEC and that just isn't going to happen.  Smiley Smiley Smiley




It's called Classical Liberalism.

I believe the phrase you're looking for is: "a person who is capable of thinking outside the square".

Why, thank you, Caesar!



What fkken square? There is no square, so not so much thinking, just emotional over reaction.


You want homos to marry, well bully fkk for you. Me not giving a fkk has no affect on you or the fkken homos and never will.


Now calm your classical liberalism tits and move on champ.  Smiley Smiley



Why is it that every second word you use is 'fkken'? Is that how you talk in real life to people? You realize that it's totally uncouth.

Are you a bogan?
Back to top
 

The Progressive President
 
IP Logged
 
Mr Hammer
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 25212
Gender: male
Re: VOTE NO!!!!!
Reply #274 - Aug 9th, 2017 at 5:51pm
 
mothra wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 3:12pm:
Auggie wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 3:09pm:
mothra wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 3:03pm:
Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 2:59pm:
mothra wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 2:49pm:
Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 2:49pm:
mothra wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 2:44pm:
Hammer, if i have sex with a woman, am i automatically a lesbian?

And if so, am i only a lesbian for the duration of our love-making?



I take it you're using the example of yourself as a woman who has only had sex with men up to that point?


Then obviously, you're bisexual.

If you like.




No. I'm not. I'm very heterosexual. But i have had sex with women.


That's very strange, Mothra. I'm heterosexual but I have never considered nor would ever consider having sex with another male (or a female, if you believe as Aussie does that I'm woman).


Not so strange, Augie. Not at all uncommon for people to have had same sex encounters throughout their life that they are not defined by.

I have no hang-ups about sex.


I have no hang-ups about sex eitheter. The issue is about marriage. Obviously though, you are bisexual - bi meaning two. That's because you've had sex with members of both sexes. How you'd prefer to be labelled is irrelevant.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Mr Hammer
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 25212
Gender: male
Re: VOTE NO!!!!!
Reply #275 - Aug 9th, 2017 at 5:53pm
 
[quote author=augcaesarustus link=1502181021/272#272 date=1502262430]Hammer's silence on this issue indicates that he is stumped by his BS regarding 'sexuality is not biological' or that 'sexuality isn't relevant' until you've had sex.

He's using leftard arguments to propagate his own right-wing agenda.

Hahahaha....  ::) ::) ::) ::)[/quote]

I agreed with you right from the beginning that sexuality is biological. I don't know why you keep on insisting the opposite.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
BigOl64
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 14438
Townsville QLD
Gender: male
Re: VOTE NO!!!!!
Reply #276 - Aug 9th, 2017 at 5:56pm
 
Auggie wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 5:08pm:
BigOl64 wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 3:11pm:
Auggie wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 2:58pm:
BigOl64 wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 2:56pm:
Auggie wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 2:41pm:
BigOl64 wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 2:39pm:
[ftp][/ftp]Auggie wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 2:31pm:
BigOl64 wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 2:28pm:
The poll seems rather odd

The OP is about voting 'no' for the homo thing, but the poll only asks if you are going to vote yes or no and if you care about voting, not about voting for the homo thing.


Now obviously I don't vote for mindless horse sh1t reasons, so I said no, but I also don't care.


Should I change my vote?


Well, what your opinion on the 'homo thing' to use your brusque and uneducated terminology?




I truly cannot must a single fkk to give, nothing to do with me; don't care.


Mind you anything that stops a whinging minority form whinging about some bullsh1t or other, sometimes is not a bad thing. But they actually have to stop whinging.



So, if Chinese teenagers were being captured a sold into slavery, should they stop winging because it's 'only a minority?'

Your complete disregard for basic human rights and liberties is shocking.

Almost akin to the attitudes of Islamofascists.....



That is seriously the most fkken stupid analogy any of you fkkheaded socialist have every presented to counter one of my posts.  Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin



Not giving a fkk, is not giving a fkk, nothing more than that you hysterical fkken loon.


But if you want I could just pick the no side, for sh1ts and giggles, but that would mean i would have to register with the AEC and that just isn't going to happen.  Smiley Smiley Smiley




It's called Classical Liberalism.

I believe the phrase you're looking for is: "a person who is capable of thinking outside the square".

Why, thank you, Caesar!



What fkken square? There is no square, so not so much thinking, just emotional over reaction.


You want homos to marry, well bully fkk for you. Me not giving a fkk has no affect on you or the fkken homos and never will.


Now calm your classical liberalism tits and move on champ.  Smiley Smiley



Why is it that every second word you use is 'fkken'? Is that how you talk in real life to people? You realize that it's totally uncouth.

Are you a bogan?



Are you an old lady, or just one of those social justice warriors in search of offence?


You seem especially easily offended, but you did demand I provide you with an opinion and now you are crying about the language in which it came.

Maybe in future put out a SJW soft c0ck warning to those you wish to demand comment from, so they may tell you that you may be frightened or offended by any such brutish language in their reply.


Or you could just harden the fkk up and not be such a prissy little b1tch, either works.  Smiley Smiley


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Auggie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


The Bull Moose

Posts: 8571
Re: VOTE NO!!!!!
Reply #277 - Aug 9th, 2017 at 6:25pm
 
BigOl64 wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 5:56pm:
Are you an old lady, or just one of those social justice warriors in search of offence?


I am neither.

BigOl64 wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 5:56pm:
You seem especially easily offended


Nah, I'm not offended, I'm just disgusted.

BigOl64 wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 5:56pm:
but you did demand I provide you with an opinion and now you are crying about the language in which it came.


I'm actually a conservative in this regard: people should attempt to comport themselves with civility and propriety. It's what it means to be a civilized society.

BigOl64 wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 5:56pm:
Or you could just harden the fkk up and not be such a prissy little b1tch, either works


How about you cease employing the word 'fkken'? Conduct yourself with civility.
Back to top
 

The Progressive President
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 74687
Gender: male
Re: VOTE NO!!!!!
Reply #278 - Aug 9th, 2017 at 7:46pm
 
Neferti wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 4:43pm:
John Smith wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 3:29pm:
cods wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 3:13pm:
now we will have a postal.. god give us strength..$122mil... and thats what they tell us...


you realise that the pleb if it had passed the senate would have cost $180mil? right?
(ohh, and welcome back)
  Cheesy Cheesy


What was The Government going to use the Aussie MasterCard, if not for this SSM nonsense. Huh?  Free stuff for asylum seekers? Grin Or building FREE homes for the homeless in Martin Place?  Roll Eyes

I think it is about time that EVERYBODY got off their arses and stopped depending on The Government.


this government? they'd probably have included it with the $30m they gifted to Murdock
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 137833
Gender: male
Re: VOTE NO!!!!!
Reply #279 - Aug 9th, 2017 at 7:49pm
 
Auggie wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 5:07pm:
Hammer's silence on this issue indicates that he is stumped by his BS regarding 'sexuality is not biological' or that 'sexuality isn't relevant' until you've had sex.

He's using leftard arguments to propagate his own right-wing agenda.

Hahahaha....  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


Hammer isn't the sharpest tool in the shed - we all know that.

However, he has pretty good taste in music.

For that reason alone, I'm willing to go (relatively) easy on him.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 105370
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: VOTE NO!!!!!
Reply #280 - Aug 9th, 2017 at 7:53pm
 
I'm voting no because our leaders have failed to allow
us a vote on more important issues:

Why not have a postal vote about every contentious issue?

(1) Death penalty for the most heinous crimes.
(2) Euthanasia
(3) What illicit drugs can be made legal.
(4) More or less power to the State Govts.
(5) Green energy policy.
(6) Nuclear power.
(7) debt ceiling for the Govt. ( or will it be 100% of GDP before long?)


It would cost no more money to print such extra questions on the paper.
Why won't they do it?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 74687
Gender: male
Re: VOTE NO!!!!!
Reply #281 - Aug 9th, 2017 at 7:58pm
 
Bobby. wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 7:53pm:
I'm voting no because our leaders have failed to allow
us a vote on more important issues
:

Why not have a postal vote about every contentious issue?

(1) Death penalty for the most heinous crimes.
(2) Euthanasia
(3) What illicit drugs can be made legal.
(4) More or less power to the State Govts.
(5) Green energy policy.
(6) Nuclear power.
(7) debt ceiling for the Govt. ( or will it be 100% of GDP before long?)


It would cost no more money to print such extra questions on the paper.
Why won't they do it?



geez you're full of sh1t. Why do you have to lie all the time?

you're going to vote no because you're a homophobic cretin. Everything else is just an excuse. Everyone knows the truth, why lie?
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 74687
Gender: male
Re: VOTE NO!!!!!
Reply #282 - Aug 9th, 2017 at 7:59pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 7:49pm:
Hammer isn't the sharpest tool in the shed - we all know that.


is he even in the shed?
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 137833
Gender: male
Re: VOTE NO!!!!!
Reply #283 - Aug 9th, 2017 at 8:00pm
 
John Smith wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 7:58pm:
Bobby. wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 7:53pm:
I'm voting no because our leaders have failed to allow
us a vote on more important issues
:

Why not have a postal vote about every contentious issue?

(1) Death penalty for the most heinous crimes.
(2) Euthanasia
(3) What illicit drugs can be made legal.
(4) More or less power to the State Govts.
(5) Green energy policy.
(6) Nuclear power.
(7) debt ceiling for the Govt. ( or will it be 100% of GDP before long?)


It would cost no more money to print such extra questions on the paper.
Why won't they do it?



geez you're full of sh1t. Why do you have to lie all the time?

you're going to vote no because you're a homophobic cretin.



I'm not so sure.

I truly believe that Booby doth protest too much.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 74687
Gender: male
Re: VOTE NO!!!!!
Reply #284 - Aug 9th, 2017 at 8:01pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 8:00pm:
John Smith wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 7:58pm:
Bobby. wrote on Aug 9th, 2017 at 7:53pm:
I'm voting no because our leaders have failed to allow
us a vote on more important issues
:

Why not have a postal vote about every contentious issue?

(1) Death penalty for the most heinous crimes.
(2) Euthanasia
(3) What illicit drugs can be made legal.
(4) More or less power to the State Govts.
(5) Green energy policy.
(6) Nuclear power.
(7) debt ceiling for the Govt. ( or will it be 100% of GDP before long?)


It would cost no more money to print such extra questions on the paper.
Why won't they do it?



geez you're full of sh1t. Why do you have to lie all the time?

you're going to vote no because you're a homophobic cretin.



I'm not so sure.

I truly believe that Booby doth protest too much.



We all know why he's homophobic , he's in denial .... that doesn't make him any less of a homophobe
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 17 18 19 20 21 ... 30
Send Topic Print