Australian Politics Forum - Hypocritical Labor supporters

Mr Hammer

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 25212
Gender: male

Re: Hypocritical Labor supporters
Reply #45 - Aug 10^th, 2017 at 12:54pm

juliar wrote on Aug 10^th, 2017 at 12:50pm:

The Lefties are doing their living best to change the subject by creating their usual dog's breakfast.

I'll second that. It's funny how kids in detention only became an issue when the Libs got on. There were 1,00's under Labor. Anyway they can make the Libs look racist, homophobic or whatever they'll run with it.

Back to top

IP Logged

President Elect, The Mechanic

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17501
Gender: male

Re: Hypocritical Labor supporters
Reply #46 - Aug 10^th, 2017 at 1:03pm

Vic wrote on Aug 9^th, 2017 at 4:40pm:

Was the issue raised in those years? I can't recall it being on the agenda anytime.

Quote:

Gillard - I do not support same sex marriage and will not make it legal

Plepbazerk - We dont support same sex marriage

Swan - We made it very clear that we don't support gay marriage

Wong - On the issue of marriage I think the reality is there is a cultural, religious, historical view around of which we have to respect.
The party's position is very clear that this is an institution that is between a man and a woman

Kevin Rudd has angered members of the gay community by saying he is opposed to homosexual marriage and refusing to be drawn on the question of gay couples adopting children.

Shorten who told church leaders before the 2013 election that a plebiscite would be a good way to resolve this issue

Back to top

« Last Edit: Aug 10^th, 2017 at 1:09pm by President Elect, The Mechanic »

Q

The STORM has arrived
Every Dog Has Its Day...
Dark to Light.
Sheep no more.

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 74360
Gender: male

Re: Hypocritical Labor supporters
Reply #47 - Aug 10^th, 2017 at 1:05pm

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 10^th, 2017 at 12:54pm:

It's funny how kids in detention only became an issue when the Libs got on

it became an issue when the media got it's hands on the cctv footage of a kid being abused by thugs and the libs then tried to shove their heads in the sand about it. If they had dealt with it effectively, there would have been no issue.

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

Secret Wars

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3928
Gender: male

Re: Hypocritical Labor supporters
Reply #48 - Aug 10^th, 2017 at 1:05pm

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Aug 10^th, 2017 at 12:51pm:

juliar wrote on Aug 10^th, 2017 at 12:50pm:

The Lefties are doing their living best to change the subject by creating their usual dog's breakfast.

Juliar, there there one day you'll meet the man of your dreams.

You know yourself, Gregg and John would do a more convincing act, and it must be an act, of tolerance if you quit taunting posters you don't like by accusing them of homosexuality. Roll Eyes

Back to top

IP Logged

Mr Hammer

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 25212
Gender: male

Re: Hypocritical Labor supporters
Reply #49 - Aug 10^th, 2017 at 1:06pm

John Smith wrote on Aug 10^th, 2017 at 1:05pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 10^th, 2017 at 12:54pm:

It's funny how kids in detention only became an issue when the Libs got on

it became an issue when the media got it's hands on the cctv footage of a kid being abused by thugs and the libs then tried to shove their heads in the sand about it. If they had dealt with it effectively, there would have been no issue.

So it wasn't an issue when kids were drowning?

Back to top

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 74360
Gender: male

Re: Hypocritical Labor supporters
Reply #50 - Aug 10^th, 2017 at 2:24pm

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 10^th, 2017 at 1:06pm:

John Smith wrote on Aug 10^th, 2017 at 1:05pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 10^th, 2017 at 12:54pm:

It's funny how kids in detention only became an issue when the Libs got on

it became an issue when the media got it's hands on the cctv footage of a kid being abused by thugs and the libs then tried to shove their heads in the sand about it. If they had dealt with it effectively, there would have been no issue.

So it wasn't an issue when kids were drowning?

are you pretending no one made an issue of drownings?

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

matty

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 11055
East Sydney
Gender: male

Re: Hypocritical Labor supporters
Reply #51 - Aug 10^th, 2017 at 2:28pm

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Aug 10^th, 2017 at 12:27pm:

matty wrote on Aug 10^th, 2017 at 12:22pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Aug 10^th, 2017 at 8:30am:

matty wrote on Aug 9^th, 2017 at 11:17pm:

Dnarever wrote on Aug 9^th, 2017 at 9:08pm:

Quote:

Hypocritical Labor supporters

Hypocrisy - a term that Matty should stay away from.

It is hypocrisy for Matty to refer to hypocrisy.

How? If you're going to call someone something then give examples, as I have done.

Well hypocrisy is claiming you're sick of hearing about SSM by starting a new thread (amongst many) of SSM

Not really. If am sick of hearing about the topic but at the same time I am wondering why those Labor supporters who want the current government to act never said anything whilst Labor was in government.

So wonder to yourself, rather than starting a thread. And we did. So grow the bugger up.

I will do whatever I want thanks very much.

Back to top

BILL SHORTEN WILL NEVER BE PM!!!!

IP Logged

matty

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 11055
East Sydney
Gender: male

Re: Hypocritical Labor supporters
Reply #52 - Aug 10^th, 2017 at 2:29pm

John Smith wrote on Aug 10^th, 2017 at 12:36pm:

matty wrote on Aug 9^th, 2017 at 11:17pm:

John Smith wrote on Aug 9^th, 2017 at 8:17pm:

matty wrote on Aug 9^th, 2017 at 4:35pm:

but I would just like to know, all these Labor supporters and members saying that the government needs to act on the issue, where were all of you between 2007-2013?

does it matter? does that mean the libs can waste $200m?

These attempts at deflecting from Malcolms lack of testicular fortitude are pretty pathetic, even for you.

Yes it does matter because it smacks of hypocrisy.

The second part is a) ironic because you're the one deflecting and b) nonsensical because I have been nothing but a vocal critic of Malcolm since day dot.

there is no hypocrisy. Labor didn't have the numbers to pass the legislation when they were in government so there was little point in pursuing it. I realise you don't like reality but most of us live in the real world

So numbers in Parliament is what it's all about? Also Labor had 83 in the lower house from 2007-2010 so why didn't the left campaign for them to pass it?

Back to top

BILL SHORTEN WILL NEVER BE PM!!!!

IP Logged

matty

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 11055
East Sydney
Gender: male

Re: Hypocritical Labor supporters
Reply #53 - Aug 10^th, 2017 at 2:31pm

John Smith wrote on Aug 10^th, 2017 at 12:47pm:

matty wrote on Aug 9^th, 2017 at 11:17pm:

John Smith wrote on Aug 9^th, 2017 at 8:17pm:

matty wrote on Aug 9^th, 2017 at 4:35pm:

but I would just like to know, all these Labor supporters and members saying that the government needs to act on the issue, where were all of you between 2007-2013?

does it matter? does that mean the libs can waste $200m?

These attempts at deflecting from Malcolms lack of testicular fortitude are pretty pathetic, even for you.

Yes it does matter because it smacks of hypocrisy.

The second part is a) ironic because you're the one deflecting and b) nonsensical because I have been nothing but a vocal critic of Malcolm since day dot.

a) I have nothing to deflect. YOur whole argument is based on a load of crap
b) don't care that you don't like malcolm, you like his attempts to stall on the ssm issue

1. You deflected to the price of the plebiscite, not the issue at hand.
2. Not really. I wish he would just end it.

Back to top

BILL SHORTEN WILL NEVER BE PM!!!!

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 74360
Gender: male

Re: Hypocritical Labor supporters
Reply #54 - Aug 10^th, 2017 at 2:31pm

matty wrote on Aug 10^th, 2017 at 2:29pm:

John Smith wrote on Aug 10^th, 2017 at 12:36pm:

matty wrote on Aug 9^th, 2017 at 11:17pm:

John Smith wrote on Aug 9^th, 2017 at 8:17pm:

matty wrote on Aug 9^th, 2017 at 4:35pm:

but I would just like to know, all these Labor supporters and members saying that the government needs to act on the issue, where were all of you between 2007-2013?

does it matter? does that mean the libs can waste $200m?

These attempts at deflecting from Malcolms lack of testicular fortitude are pretty pathetic, even for you.

Yes it does matter because it smacks of hypocrisy.

The second part is a) ironic because you're the one deflecting and b) nonsensical because I have been nothing but a vocal critic of Malcolm since day dot.

there is no hypocrisy. Labor didn't have the numbers to pass the legislation when they were in government so there was little point in pursuing it. I realise you don't like reality but most of us live in the real world

So numbers in Parliament is what it's all about? Also Labor had 83 in the lower house from 2007-2010 so why didn't the left campaign for them to pass it?

not sure why you're struggling. Labor didn't have the numbers. Their are two houses legislation has to pass, not one.

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

matty Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 11055 East Sydney Gender:	Re: Hypocritical Labor supporters Reply #55 - Aug 10^th, 2017 at 2:32pm I will accept homosexual couples as legitimate when a two dicks or two pussies can make a baby. Until then it is completely unnatural and despicable to knowingly deprive a child of a mother and father.
Back to top	BILL SHORTEN WILL NEVER BE PM!!!! IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 136906
Gender: male

Re: Hypocritical Labor supporters
Reply #56 - Aug 10^th, 2017 at 2:34pm

matty wrote on Aug 10^th, 2017 at 2:29pm:

John Smith wrote on Aug 10^th, 2017 at 12:36pm:

matty wrote on Aug 9^th, 2017 at 11:17pm:

John Smith wrote on Aug 9^th, 2017 at 8:17pm:

matty wrote on Aug 9^th, 2017 at 4:35pm:

but I would just like to know, all these Labor supporters and members saying that the government needs to act on the issue, where were all of you between 2007-2013?

does it matter? does that mean the libs can waste $200m?

These attempts at deflecting from Malcolms lack of testicular fortitude are pretty pathetic, even for you.

Yes it does matter because it smacks of hypocrisy.

The second part is a) ironic because you're the one deflecting and b) nonsensical because I have been nothing but a vocal critic of Malcolm since day dot.

there is no hypocrisy. Labor didn't have the numbers to pass the legislation when they were in government so there was little point in pursuing it. I realise you don't like reality but most of us live in the real world

So numbers in Parliament is what it's all about? Also Labor had 83 in the lower house from 2007-2010 so why didn't the left campaign for them to pass it?

Because this guy wouldn't allow it.

Back to top

IP Logged

matty

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 11055
East Sydney
Gender: male

Re: Hypocritical Labor supporters
Reply #57 - Aug 10^th, 2017 at 2:34pm

John Smith wrote on Aug 10^th, 2017 at 2:31pm:

matty wrote on Aug 10^th, 2017 at 2:29pm:

John Smith wrote on Aug 10^th, 2017 at 12:36pm:

matty wrote on Aug 9^th, 2017 at 11:17pm:

John Smith wrote on Aug 9^th, 2017 at 8:17pm:

matty wrote on Aug 9^th, 2017 at 4:35pm:

but I would just like to know, all these Labor supporters and members saying that the government needs to act on the issue, where were all of you between 2007-2013?

does it matter? does that mean the libs can waste $200m?

These attempts at deflecting from Malcolms lack of testicular fortitude are pretty pathetic, even for you.

Yes it does matter because it smacks of hypocrisy.

The second part is a) ironic because you're the one deflecting and b) nonsensical because I have been nothing but a vocal critic of Malcolm since day dot.

there is no hypocrisy. Labor didn't have the numbers to pass the legislation when they were in government so there was little point in pursuing it. I realise you don't like reality but most of us live in the real world

So numbers in Parliament is what it's all about? Also Labor had 83 in the lower house from 2007-2010 so why didn't the left campaign for them to pass it?

not sure why you're struggling. Labor didn't have the numbers. Their are two houses legislation has to pass, not one.

Not struggling at all. I am just wondering why you think it's all about numbers.

Not to mention the fact that the Coalition does not have the numbers either. All of their MPs went to the election on a platform of a plebiscite and not a free vote.

Back to top

BILL SHORTEN WILL NEVER BE PM!!!!

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 74360
Gender: male

Re: Hypocritical Labor supporters
Reply #58 - Aug 10^th, 2017 at 2:34pm

matty wrote on Aug 10^th, 2017 at 2:31pm:

John Smith wrote on Aug 10^th, 2017 at 12:47pm:

matty wrote on Aug 9^th, 2017 at 11:17pm:

John Smith wrote on Aug 9^th, 2017 at 8:17pm:

matty wrote on Aug 9^th, 2017 at 4:35pm:

but I would just like to know, all these Labor supporters and members saying that the government needs to act on the issue, where were all of you between 2007-2013?

does it matter? does that mean the libs can waste $200m?

These attempts at deflecting from Malcolms lack of testicular fortitude are pretty pathetic, even for you.

Yes it does matter because it smacks of hypocrisy.

The second part is a) ironic because you're the one deflecting and b) nonsensical because I have been nothing but a vocal critic of Malcolm since day dot.

a) I have nothing to deflect. YOur whole argument is based on a load of crap
b) don't care that you don't like malcolm, you like his attempts to stall on the ssm issue

1. You deflected to the price of the plebiscite, not the issue at hand.
2. Not really. I wish he would just end it.

1. since you're whole thread is to whinge about labors objection to the plebiscite, the cost is very relevant and not a deflection
2. quickest, cheapest and easiest way to end it is to allow a conscience vote and get it over and done with. He'll have to do it after the plebiscite anyway, so why stall?

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 136906
Gender: male

Re: Hypocritical Labor supporters
Reply #59 - Aug 10^th, 2017 at 2:35pm

matty wrote on Aug 10^th, 2017 at 2:32pm:

I will accept homosexual couples as legitimate when a two dicks or two pussies can make a baby. Until then it is completely unnatural and despicable to knowingly deprive a child of a mother and father.

Married couples don't have to have children.

You do understand that, don't you?

Back to top

IP Logged