thecuriousmail
Gold Member
Offline
Australian Politics
Posts: 722
Brisbane
Gender:
|
The full text of the ANZUS Treaty is available online.
Article V For the purpose of Article IV, an armed attack on any of the Parties is deemed to include an armed attack on the metropolitan territory of any of the Parties, or on the island territories under its jurisdiction in the Pacific or on its armed forces, public vessels or aircraft in the Pacific. A pre-emptive strike by america is not covered in the treaty, somewhat obviously. Which will get china involved. Turnbull says, due to anzus treaty, australia will be involved (whatever the circumstance).
My concern is you have two idiots with bad haircuts making the decision. What's the chance of a misunderstanding? Or a misinterpretation? If we can go to war on the pretext of the enemy having WMD, even when our government had prior information from their own agencies that this was not the case, should something happen with US-North Korea, it may well be a while (a few nuclear bombs, X number of casualties) before the truth comes out.
American troops in Korea it would seem are covered under the ANZUS treaty. So in a very small area, around the DMZ, you have american, south korean, and north korean troops, and not far away, the chinese PLA.
No chance of something going wrong there! Especially when the bad haircut boys are beating their chests.
|