sir prince duke alevine
|
mothra wrote on Sep 2 nd, 2017 at 12:25am: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 2 nd, 2017 at 12:20am: mothra wrote on Sep 2 nd, 2017 at 12:16am: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 2 nd, 2017 at 12:15am: mothra wrote on Sep 2 nd, 2017 at 12:09am: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 2 nd, 2017 at 12:05am: mothra wrote on Sep 1 st, 2017 at 11:56pm: You have been studying FD, haven't you.
This is beneath you, Alevine. Have you ever considered that perahaps freediver is not the issue? I mean, we jump on this forum, you give us your absolute bonkers opinion on the state of islam, we demonstrate quite easily how you're not thinking adequately about the issues, you then progress to call us islamophobic, bigoted, etc and argue strawman arguments. I really do wish you would stop calling yourself a feminist and a progressive. You are neither. What is my "bonkers" opinion on the "state of Islam" Alevine? It seems that most of our discussion has been you arguing with me about things you've made up that i've said. Which is very much like what FD does. Your bonkers opinion is that while there is 'some' bad in islam, there is plenty of good so let's concentrate on the good because apparently that will somehow eradicate the bad. So each time a woman gets gang raped and stoned to death, I guess by ignoring this and instead thinking about some westernised muslim woman claiming that islam is feminist, behind a burqa she'll claim she wears freely of course, we will make everything a lot better. Basically you just want some blinkers around your eyes. Not sure why you afford Islam so much patience. I never said that. Go back and read what i said again. You don't need to say it, you demonstrate it with everything else you say. Tell me Alevine, at which point tonight in our conversation was there a point in which we could sensibly discuss women's rights in parts of the Middle East? I spent most of it saying "i didn't say that" and the rest of the time trying to calmly explain to you why i prefer to use the descriptor "repressive regime" over "Muslim". Do you honestly think there was a point which was conducive to a constructive dialogue? I don't really think it's possible to have a constructive dialogue with someone who jumps on using words like bigoted, only to then not even explain why they did so. And I offered to discuss Middle East, it was you who then instead decided to strawman and suggest I don't consider any other part of the world Muslim. So how can we have a discussion at all when you're always on the defensive, and incapable to being constructive? And you never actually explained why you prefer to use 'repressive regime' over 'Muslim'. instead you berated me again over a strawman because you thought I was comparing islam to fascism (which, to be fair I do quite often, because they aren't too far apart, except I didn't in our discussion nor in this thread). Anyway, I think if you want to have an honest and constructive dialogue then you need to first change yourself.
|