Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 
Send Topic Print
Musims and gay marriage (Read 11195 times)
sir prince duke alevine
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male
Re: Musims and gay marriage
Reply #60 - Sep 1st, 2017 at 11:28pm
 
mothra wrote on Sep 1st, 2017 at 11:04pm:
You're not getting it, Alevine. I don't think you can say that Islam is a repressive religion because some people use it to repress people any more than you can say of any other religion. There are just too many Muslims that aren't repressed by their interpretation of their religion.

I don't know how many ways i can say it.

Or how many times.

Sure, all religions are repressive. But not to the same calibre.  Conservative islam is growing, and I'd say that's the one we should prioritise our concern with.  And whether one is or isn't repressed is unfortunately not always up to the person being repressed to decide.  You should read 'on tyranny' by timothy snyder.
Back to top
 

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.
 
IP Logged
 
mothra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 35267
Gender: female
Re: Musims and gay marriage
Reply #61 - Sep 1st, 2017 at 11:51pm
 
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 1st, 2017 at 11:28pm:
mothra wrote on Sep 1st, 2017 at 11:04pm:
You're not getting it, Alevine. I don't think you can say that Islam is a repressive religion because some people use it to repress people any more than you can say of any other religion. There are just too many Muslims that aren't repressed by their interpretation of their religion.

I don't know how many ways i can say it.

Or how many times.

Sure, all religions are repressive. But not to the same calibre.  Conservative islam is growing, and I'd say that's the one we should prioritise our concern with.  And whether one is or isn't repressed is unfortunately not always up to the person being repressed to decide.  You should read 'on tyranny' by timothy snyder.



Meh. Islamic reform is growing too. In all sorts of interesting places.

When you seek to represent Islam by the worst case scenarios, you negate all that is peaceful too.

If you lot would stop doing that, we could actually discuss the issues.
Back to top
 

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.
 
IP Logged
 
sir prince duke alevine
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male
Re: Musims and gay marriage
Reply #62 - Sep 1st, 2017 at 11:53pm
 
mothra wrote on Sep 1st, 2017 at 11:51pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 1st, 2017 at 11:28pm:
mothra wrote on Sep 1st, 2017 at 11:04pm:
You're not getting it, Alevine. I don't think you can say that Islam is a repressive religion because some people use it to repress people any more than you can say of any other religion. There are just too many Muslims that aren't repressed by their interpretation of their religion.

I don't know how many ways i can say it.

Or how many times.

Sure, all religions are repressive. But not to the same calibre.  Conservative islam is growing, and I'd say that's the one we should prioritise our concern with.  And whether one is or isn't repressed is unfortunately not always up to the person being repressed to decide.  You should read 'on tyranny' by timothy snyder.



Meh. Islamic reform is growing too. In all sorts of interesting places.

When you seek to represent Islam by the worst case scenarios, you negate all that is peaceful too.

If you lot would stop doing that, we could actually discuss the issues.

Not at all. I seek to represent islam by the worst case scenarios because they are the common case scenarios.


And the next time a woman is gangraped and then stoned I'll just tell her mothra says, 'meh'.

And you're right, reform is happening in Islam. By 2057, women may be allowed to drive Wink
Back to top
 

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.
 
IP Logged
 
mothra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 35267
Gender: female
Re: Musims and gay marriage
Reply #63 - Sep 1st, 2017 at 11:54pm
 
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 1st, 2017 at 11:53pm:
mothra wrote on Sep 1st, 2017 at 11:51pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 1st, 2017 at 11:28pm:
mothra wrote on Sep 1st, 2017 at 11:04pm:
You're not getting it, Alevine. I don't think you can say that Islam is a repressive religion because some people use it to repress people any more than you can say of any other religion. There are just too many Muslims that aren't repressed by their interpretation of their religion.

I don't know how many ways i can say it.

Or how many times.

Sure, all religions are repressive. But not to the same calibre.  Conservative islam is growing, and I'd say that's the one we should prioritise our concern with.  And whether one is or isn't repressed is unfortunately not always up to the person being repressed to decide.  You should read 'on tyranny' by timothy snyder.



Meh. Islamic reform is growing too. In all sorts of interesting places.

When you seek to represent Islam by the worst case scenarios, you negate all that is peaceful too.

If you lot would stop doing that, we could actually discuss the issues.

Not at all. I seek to represent islam by the worst case scenarios because they are the common case scenarios.


And the next time a woman is gangraped and then stoned I'll just tell her mothra says, 'meh'.



Same tactics. Can't you try a little harder?
Back to top
 

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.
 
IP Logged
 
sir prince duke alevine
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male
Re: Musims and gay marriage
Reply #64 - Sep 1st, 2017 at 11:55pm
 
mothra wrote on Sep 1st, 2017 at 11:54pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 1st, 2017 at 11:53pm:
mothra wrote on Sep 1st, 2017 at 11:51pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 1st, 2017 at 11:28pm:
mothra wrote on Sep 1st, 2017 at 11:04pm:
You're not getting it, Alevine. I don't think you can say that Islam is a repressive religion because some people use it to repress people any more than you can say of any other religion. There are just too many Muslims that aren't repressed by their interpretation of their religion.

I don't know how many ways i can say it.

Or how many times.

Sure, all religions are repressive. But not to the same calibre.  Conservative islam is growing, and I'd say that's the one we should prioritise our concern with.  And whether one is or isn't repressed is unfortunately not always up to the person being repressed to decide.  You should read 'on tyranny' by timothy snyder.



Meh. Islamic reform is growing too. In all sorts of interesting places.

When you seek to represent Islam by the worst case scenarios, you negate all that is peaceful too.

If you lot would stop doing that, we could actually discuss the issues.

Not at all. I seek to represent islam by the worst case scenarios because they are the common case scenarios.


And the next time a woman is gangraped and then stoned I'll just tell her mothra says, 'meh'.



Same tactics. Can't you try a little harder?

with you it's become obvious it's kind of pointless given how oblivious you are to the harm you're doing.
Back to top
 

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.
 
IP Logged
 
mothra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 35267
Gender: female
Re: Musims and gay marriage
Reply #65 - Sep 1st, 2017 at 11:56pm
 
You have been studying FD, haven't you.

This is beneath you, Alevine.
Back to top
 

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.
 
IP Logged
 
sir prince duke alevine
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male
Re: Musims and gay marriage
Reply #66 - Sep 2nd, 2017 at 12:05am
 
mothra wrote on Sep 1st, 2017 at 11:56pm:
You have been studying FD, haven't you.

This is beneath you, Alevine.

Have you ever considered that perahaps freediver is not the issue? I mean, we jump on this forum, you give us your absolute bonkers opinion on the state of islam, we demonstrate quite easily how you're not thinking adequately about the issues, you then progress to call us islamophobic, bigoted, etc and argue strawman arguments. 

I really do wish you would stop calling yourself a feminist and a progressive. You are neither.
Back to top
 

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.
 
IP Logged
 
mothra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 35267
Gender: female
Re: Musims and gay marriage
Reply #67 - Sep 2nd, 2017 at 12:09am
 
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 2nd, 2017 at 12:05am:
mothra wrote on Sep 1st, 2017 at 11:56pm:
You have been studying FD, haven't you.

This is beneath you, Alevine.

Have you ever considered that perahaps freediver is not the issue? I mean, we jump on this forum, you give us your absolute bonkers opinion on the state of islam, we demonstrate quite easily how you're not thinking adequately about the issues, you then progress to call us islamophobic, bigoted, etc and argue strawman arguments. 

I really do wish you would stop calling yourself a feminist and a progressive. You are neither.



What is my "bonkers" opinion on the "state of Islam" Alevine?

It seems that most of our discussion has been you arguing with me about things you've made up that i've said.

Which is very much like what FD does.
Back to top
 

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.
 
IP Logged
 
sir prince duke alevine
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male
Re: Musims and gay marriage
Reply #68 - Sep 2nd, 2017 at 12:15am
 
mothra wrote on Sep 2nd, 2017 at 12:09am:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 2nd, 2017 at 12:05am:
mothra wrote on Sep 1st, 2017 at 11:56pm:
You have been studying FD, haven't you.

This is beneath you, Alevine.

Have you ever considered that perahaps freediver is not the issue? I mean, we jump on this forum, you give us your absolute bonkers opinion on the state of islam, we demonstrate quite easily how you're not thinking adequately about the issues, you then progress to call us islamophobic, bigoted, etc and argue strawman arguments. 

I really do wish you would stop calling yourself a feminist and a progressive. You are neither.



What is my "bonkers" opinion on the "state of Islam" Alevine?

It seems that most of our discussion has been you arguing with me about things you've made up that i've said.

Which is very much like what FD does.

Your bonkers opinion is that while there is 'some' bad in islam, there is plenty of good so let's concentrate on the good because apparently that will somehow eradicate the bad.  So each time a woman gets gang raped and stoned to death, I guess by ignoring this and instead thinking about some westernised muslim woman claiming that islam is feminist, behind a burqa she'll claim she wears freely of course, we will make everything a lot better.

Basically you just want some blinkers around your eyes. Not sure why you afford Islam so much patience.
Back to top
 

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.
 
IP Logged
 
mothra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 35267
Gender: female
Re: Musims and gay marriage
Reply #69 - Sep 2nd, 2017 at 12:16am
 
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 2nd, 2017 at 12:15am:
mothra wrote on Sep 2nd, 2017 at 12:09am:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 2nd, 2017 at 12:05am:
mothra wrote on Sep 1st, 2017 at 11:56pm:
You have been studying FD, haven't you.

This is beneath you, Alevine.

Have you ever considered that perahaps freediver is not the issue? I mean, we jump on this forum, you give us your absolute bonkers opinion on the state of islam, we demonstrate quite easily how you're not thinking adequately about the issues, you then progress to call us islamophobic, bigoted, etc and argue strawman arguments. 

I really do wish you would stop calling yourself a feminist and a progressive. You are neither.



What is my "bonkers" opinion on the "state of Islam" Alevine?

It seems that most of our discussion has been you arguing with me about things you've made up that i've said.

Which is very much like what FD does.

Your bonkers opinion is that while there is 'some' bad in islam, there is plenty of good so let's concentrate on the good because apparently that will somehow eradicate the bad.  So each time a woman gets gang raped and stoned to death, I guess by ignoring this and instead thinking about some westernised muslim woman claiming that islam is feminist, behind a burqa she'll claim she wears freely of course, we will make everything a lot better.

Basically you just want some blinkers around your eyes. Not sure why you afford Islam so much patience.



I never said that. Go back and read what i said again.
Back to top
 

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.
 
IP Logged
 
sir prince duke alevine
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male
Re: Musims and gay marriage
Reply #70 - Sep 2nd, 2017 at 12:20am
 
mothra wrote on Sep 2nd, 2017 at 12:16am:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 2nd, 2017 at 12:15am:
mothra wrote on Sep 2nd, 2017 at 12:09am:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 2nd, 2017 at 12:05am:
mothra wrote on Sep 1st, 2017 at 11:56pm:
You have been studying FD, haven't you.

This is beneath you, Alevine.

Have you ever considered that perahaps freediver is not the issue? I mean, we jump on this forum, you give us your absolute bonkers opinion on the state of islam, we demonstrate quite easily how you're not thinking adequately about the issues, you then progress to call us islamophobic, bigoted, etc and argue strawman arguments. 

I really do wish you would stop calling yourself a feminist and a progressive. You are neither.



What is my "bonkers" opinion on the "state of Islam" Alevine?

It seems that most of our discussion has been you arguing with me about things you've made up that i've said.

Which is very much like what FD does.

Your bonkers opinion is that while there is 'some' bad in islam, there is plenty of good so let's concentrate on the good because apparently that will somehow eradicate the bad.  So each time a woman gets gang raped and stoned to death, I guess by ignoring this and instead thinking about some westernised muslim woman claiming that islam is feminist, behind a burqa she'll claim she wears freely of course, we will make everything a lot better.

Basically you just want some blinkers around your eyes. Not sure why you afford Islam so much patience.



I never said that. Go back and read what i said again.

You don't need to say it, you demonstrate it with everything else you say.
Back to top
 

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.
 
IP Logged
 
mothra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 35267
Gender: female
Re: Musims and gay marriage
Reply #71 - Sep 2nd, 2017 at 12:25am
 
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 2nd, 2017 at 12:20am:
mothra wrote on Sep 2nd, 2017 at 12:16am:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 2nd, 2017 at 12:15am:
mothra wrote on Sep 2nd, 2017 at 12:09am:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 2nd, 2017 at 12:05am:
mothra wrote on Sep 1st, 2017 at 11:56pm:
You have been studying FD, haven't you.

This is beneath you, Alevine.

Have you ever considered that perahaps freediver is not the issue? I mean, we jump on this forum, you give us your absolute bonkers opinion on the state of islam, we demonstrate quite easily how you're not thinking adequately about the issues, you then progress to call us islamophobic, bigoted, etc and argue strawman arguments. 

I really do wish you would stop calling yourself a feminist and a progressive. You are neither.



What is my "bonkers" opinion on the "state of Islam" Alevine?

It seems that most of our discussion has been you arguing with me about things you've made up that i've said.

Which is very much like what FD does.

Your bonkers opinion is that while there is 'some' bad in islam, there is plenty of good so let's concentrate on the good because apparently that will somehow eradicate the bad.  So each time a woman gets gang raped and stoned to death, I guess by ignoring this and instead thinking about some westernised muslim woman claiming that islam is feminist, behind a burqa she'll claim she wears freely of course, we will make everything a lot better.

Basically you just want some blinkers around your eyes. Not sure why you afford Islam so much patience.



I never said that. Go back and read what i said again.

You don't need to say it, you demonstrate it with everything else you say.


Tell me Alevine, at which point tonight in our conversation was there a point in which we could sensibly discuss women's rights in parts of the Middle East?

I spent most of it saying "i didn't say that" and the rest of the time trying to calmly explain to you why i prefer to use the descriptor "repressive regime" over "Muslim".

Do you honestly think there was a point which was conducive to a constructive dialogue?
Back to top
 

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.
 
IP Logged
 
sir prince duke alevine
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male
Re: Musims and gay marriage
Reply #72 - Sep 2nd, 2017 at 12:32am
 
mothra wrote on Sep 2nd, 2017 at 12:25am:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 2nd, 2017 at 12:20am:
mothra wrote on Sep 2nd, 2017 at 12:16am:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 2nd, 2017 at 12:15am:
mothra wrote on Sep 2nd, 2017 at 12:09am:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 2nd, 2017 at 12:05am:
mothra wrote on Sep 1st, 2017 at 11:56pm:
You have been studying FD, haven't you.

This is beneath you, Alevine.

Have you ever considered that perahaps freediver is not the issue? I mean, we jump on this forum, you give us your absolute bonkers opinion on the state of islam, we demonstrate quite easily how you're not thinking adequately about the issues, you then progress to call us islamophobic, bigoted, etc and argue strawman arguments. 

I really do wish you would stop calling yourself a feminist and a progressive. You are neither.



What is my "bonkers" opinion on the "state of Islam" Alevine?

It seems that most of our discussion has been you arguing with me about things you've made up that i've said.

Which is very much like what FD does.

Your bonkers opinion is that while there is 'some' bad in islam, there is plenty of good so let's concentrate on the good because apparently that will somehow eradicate the bad.  So each time a woman gets gang raped and stoned to death, I guess by ignoring this and instead thinking about some westernised muslim woman claiming that islam is feminist, behind a burqa she'll claim she wears freely of course, we will make everything a lot better.

Basically you just want some blinkers around your eyes. Not sure why you afford Islam so much patience.



I never said that. Go back and read what i said again.

You don't need to say it, you demonstrate it with everything else you say.


Tell me Alevine, at which point tonight in our conversation was there a point in which we could sensibly discuss women's rights in parts of the Middle East?

I spent most of it saying "i didn't say that" and the rest of the time trying to calmly explain to you why i prefer to use the descriptor "repressive regime" over "Muslim".

Do you honestly think there was a point which was conducive to a constructive dialogue?

I don't really think it's possible to have a constructive dialogue with someone who jumps on using words like bigoted, only to then not even explain why they did so.

And I offered to discuss Middle East, it was you who then instead decided to strawman and suggest I don't consider any other part of the world Muslim. So how can we have a discussion at all when you're always on the defensive, and incapable to being constructive?

And you never actually explained why you prefer to use 'repressive regime' over 'Muslim'. instead you berated me again over a strawman because you thought I was comparing islam to fascism (which, to be fair I do quite often, because they aren't too far apart, except I didn't in our discussion nor in this thread).

Anyway, I think if you want to have an honest and constructive dialogue then you need to first change yourself.
Back to top
 

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.
 
IP Logged
 
mothra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 35267
Gender: female
Re: Musims and gay marriage
Reply #73 - Sep 2nd, 2017 at 12:35am
 
A summation worthy of FD himself!
Back to top
 

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.
 
IP Logged
 
sir prince duke alevine
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male
Re: Musims and gay marriage
Reply #74 - Sep 2nd, 2017 at 12:42am
 
mothra wrote on Sep 2nd, 2017 at 12:35am:
A summation worthy of FD himself!

that is meant to be insulting somehow? Mothra, what part of my summation was wrong? Be specific.
Back to top
 

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 
Send Topic Print