Australian Politics Forum - Normal People should vote NO

Bam

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 21905
Gender: male

Re: Normal People should vote NO
Reply #240 - Sep 6^th, 2017 at 6:59pm

Neferti wrote on Sep 5^th, 2017 at 8:00pm:

Dnarever wrote on Sep 5^th, 2017 at 7:53pm:

Aussie wrote on Sep 5^th, 2017 at 3:53pm:

bogarde73 wrote on Sep 5^th, 2017 at 3:47pm:

How do you know when someone's normal?
What is normal?

The answer is simple.

Vote 'No,' you are normal.

Normal is to vote 'No.'

Does anyone want to be normal ????

What is normal?

. male + female
. male + male
. female + female
. dog + male
. sheep + male
. child + male
. many females + male

and so forth .....

ALL those people consider themselves normal.

Who are you to judge?

The "survey" is about same sex marriage. Everything else you have listed is irrelevant. The slippery slope fallacy isn't a convincing argument. Try again.

Back to top

You are not entitled to your opinion. You are only entitled to hold opinions that you can defend through sound, reasoned argument.

IP Logged

Mr Hammer Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 25212 Gender:	Re: Normal People should vote NO Reply #241 - Sep 6^th, 2017 at 7:12pm The situation as it stands allows for tolerance of homosexuality whilst acknowledging it is an inferior lifestyle choice. Why change an ideal situation?
Back to top	IP Logged

Bam Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21905 Gender:	Re: Normal People should vote NO Reply #242 - Sep 6^th, 2017 at 11:47pm Mr Hammer wrote on Sep 6^th, 2017 at 7:12pm: The situation as it stands allows for tolerance of homosexuality whilst acknowledging it is an inferior lifestyle choice. Why change an ideal situation? You're obviously trolling. No sensible human being would wish to oppress other people simply for being different.
Back to top	You are not entitled to your opinion. You are only entitled to hold opinions that you can defend through sound, reasoned argument. IP Logged

Grappler Deep State Feller

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 85477
Always was always will be HOME
Gender: male

Re: Normal People should vote NO
Reply #243 - Sep 7^th, 2017 at 12:49am

Bam wrote on Sep 6^th, 2017 at 11:47pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Sep 6^th, 2017 at 7:12pm:

The situation as it stands allows for tolerance of homosexuality whilst acknowledging it is an inferior lifestyle choice. Why change an ideal situation?

You're obviously trolling. No sensible human being would wish to oppress other people simply for being different.

Tell that to the victims of feminism.....

Back to top

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams

IP Logged

Grappler Deep State Feller

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 85477
Always was always will be HOME
Gender: male

Re: Normal People should vote NO
Reply #244 - Sep 7^th, 2017 at 12:51am

bogarde73 wrote on Sep 6^th, 2017 at 6:57am:

Sprint, I would say that's the majority but that's a different thing from normal. If you say homosexuals are not normal then you are saying they are abnormal, not right in the head, something wrong with them. It's a short step from that to saying they should be dealt with.
And I don't think you believe that. I'm talking about consenting adults here of course.

Got it in one - they're abnormal and should just keep to themselves..... instead of inflicting their 'issues' on everyone else.

Live and let live..... we're just fighting for our raghts...

Back to top

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams

IP Logged

Grappler Deep State Feller

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 85477
Always was always will be HOME
Gender: male

Re: Normal People should vote NO
Reply #245 - Sep 7^th, 2017 at 12:52am

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 6^th, 2017 at 8:31am:

Bobby. wrote on Sep 5^th, 2017 at 9:06pm:

Johnnie wrote on Sep 5^th, 2017 at 9:00pm:

Going on this forum the poofs are in for a rude awakening, and its not before time.

AIDS Rate 50 Times Higher in Homosexual Men:

Center for Disease Control

Irrelevant.

The thread is about SSM.

SSM advocates as a group don't have a % of AIDS etc? Are they magically exempt?

Back to top

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams

IP Logged

Grappler Deep State Feller

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 85477
Always was always will be HOME
Gender: male

Re: Normal People should vote NO
Reply #246 - Sep 7^th, 2017 at 12:57am

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 6^th, 2017 at 8:45am:

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Sep 5^th, 2017 at 11:50pm:

But where does it start? How do all those men get AIDS and then pass it on? I've read that it's rife in Africa, but why - unless we accept that it is a CIA plot to exterminate Africans as some think.

Usually husbands sleep with prostitutes and then sleep with their wives with no protection. My point essentially is that HIV transmission is a far more complex picture than to say look its gays that did it. Also can we get away from using the term AIDS in this instance, its scientifically and medically lazy.

But where does it begin? Just poking a woman won't give you AIDS... I've done that many times and gladly so... where did it start?

https://books.google.com.au/books?hl=en&lr=&id=dTaMBrPBK6EC&oi=fnd&pg=PR5&dq=ori...

Someone shagged a monkey?? Gonorrhea is a disease of camels.... but let's not talk about that in case the thought police hear us... if they do we'll be a goner 'ere......

Back to top

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams

IP Logged

Grappler Deep State Feller

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 85477
Always was always will be HOME
Gender: male

Re: Normal People should vote NO
Reply #247 - Sep 7^th, 2017 at 1:02am

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 6^th, 2017 at 9:01am:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 6^th, 2017 at 8:45am:

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Sep 5^th, 2017 at 11:50pm:

But where does it start? How do all those men get AIDS and then pass it on? I've read that it's rife in Africa, but why - unless we accept that it is a CIA plot to exterminate Africans as some think.

Usually husbands sleep with prostitutes and then sleep with their wives with no protection. My point essentially is that HIV transmission is a far more complex picture than to say look its gays that did it. Also can we get away from using the term AIDS in this instance, its scientifically and medically lazy.

Marriage promotes monogamy, which results in a reduction in the spread of sexually transmitted diseases.

Sir Booby is helping the 'Yes' vote.

So all married people are monogamous? Even when not being monogamous incurs the risk of cheating within a high risk group?

The reality is that within twelve months, the 'glow' has faded and human beings, as a group, tend to want to move on.

Remember that old thing? If you put a dollar in a jar for every time you shagged in the first year of marriage and then took a dollar out for every time thereafter - you would never empty the jar.

Human sexuality is engineered to spread the genes..... how does that gel with monogamy in the modern climate of take-away and throw-away marriages?

Back to top

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams

IP Logged

Raven Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 2981 Around	Re: Normal People should vote NO Reply #248 - Sep 7^th, 2017 at 3:54am This "survey" is flawed. A NO vote is binding. A YES vote is not. What the f.uck is the point? We are asked to "vote" on legislation we haven't even seen. Why?
Back to top	Quoth the Raven "Nevermore" Raven would rather ask questions that may never be answered, then accept answers which must never be questioned. IP Logged

Mr Hammer

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 25212
Gender: male

Re: Normal People should vote NO
Reply #249 - Sep 7^th, 2017 at 5:05am

Bam wrote on Sep 6^th, 2017 at 11:47pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Sep 6^th, 2017 at 7:12pm:

The situation as it stands allows for tolerance of homosexuality whilst acknowledging it is an inferior lifestyle choice. Why change an ideal situation?

You're obviously trolling. No sensible human being would wish to oppress other people simply for being different.

Oppress!

Back to top

IP Logged

capitosinora Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 2235 USA Florida Gender:	Re: Normal People should vote NO Reply #250 - Sep 7^th, 2017 at 9:46am Don't allow adoption of children. At least don't give innocent children to Gay and lesbian pervert paedophiles.
Back to top	GOD BLESS AMERICA IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 139872 Gender:	Re: Normal People should vote NO Reply #251 - Sep 7^th, 2017 at 9:49am capitosinora wrote on Sep 7^th, 2017 at 9:46am: Don't allow adoption of children. At least don't give innocent children to Gay and lesbian pervert paedophiles. Off topic. This is about SSM.
Back to top	IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 139872 Gender:	Re: Normal People should vote NO Reply #252 - Sep 7^th, 2017 at 9:49am Raven wrote on Sep 7^th, 2017 at 3:54am: This "survey" is flawed. A NO vote is binding. A YES vote is not. What the f.uck is the point? We are asked to "vote" on legislation we haven't even seen. Why? Our politicians don't know how to do their jobs.
Back to top	IP Logged

Neferti

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 7965
Canberra
Gender: female

Re: Normal People should vote NO
Reply #253 - Sep 7^th, 2017 at 11:16am

Quote:

Consider the legislative consequences. If we redefine marriage, the Attorney-General’s Department has advised that there would be approximately 60 consequential changes across 25 Commonwealth Acts. That’s before we even understand how change would impact state and territory law, particularly as the Marriage Act interacts with anti-discrimination, charity and inheritance law.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/opinion/redefining-marriage-will-weaken-a-corne...

Back to top

IP Logged

Prime Minister for Canyons Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 26906 Canberra Gender:	Re: Normal People should vote NO Reply #254 - Sep 7^th, 2017 at 11:20am We have legislative changes with flow on effects every day. This is not an anti argument.
Back to top	In a time of universal deceit — telling the truth is a revolutionary act. No evidence whatsoever it can be attributed to George Orwell or Eric Arthur Blair (in fact the same guy) IP Logged