Australian Politics Forum - Normal People should vote NO

Sprintcyclist

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 40778
Gender: male

Re: Normal People should vote NO
Reply #60 - Sep 4^th, 2017 at 12:31pm

____ wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 12:06pm:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 11:00am:

It's a vote about what is right or wrong.

It's a vote to say to weirdos, 'we do not support your decisions or weird lifestyle.'

We do not accept you.

In our world, 'anything' does not go.

What decisions and weird lifestyle of mine offends you?

don't know, what decisions and weird lifestyle do you have ?

Back to top

Modern Classic Right Wing

IP Logged

BigOl64

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 14438
Townsville QLD
Gender: male

Re: Normal People should vote NO
Reply #61 - Sep 4^th, 2017 at 12:34pm

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 11:09am:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 11:00am:

It's a vote about what is right or wrong.

It's a vote to say to weirdos, 'we do not support your decisions or weird lifestyle.'

We do not accept you.

In our world, 'anything' does not go.

But isnt the whole point of a democratic free society that we should accept rather than limit weirdness?

I may be wrong here but in a truly free society we can either accept weirdness or reject it as equally valid options.

As soon as you force someone to accept your ideology against their own beliefs, then you are wrong. Something most socialist do not understand.

Back to top

IP Logged

Captain Caveman

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 6211
Gender: male

Re: Normal People should vote NO
Reply #62 - Sep 4^th, 2017 at 12:35pm

I really couldn't give a rats who does what.
They were already rooting each other before they wed so SSM won't start a massive influx of new disease because the sex side is already happeing and the diseases are going to happen regardless.

SS relationships aren't normal, period.
You want to do it then fine but it's not normal. Stop looking for it to be accepted as "normal". For reproduction to happen there has to be a male and female. Simple. Nothing will change that. None of you would be here without it.

IMO its a load of crap that this is even being considered as important. I'm not even voting. Shows what this world really is. Blind idiots running around making loud noises.
On the bright side it might be time to open up that divorce lawyers firm because the amount of divorces now will skyrocket.

Back to top

IP Logged

____

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male

Re: Normal People should vote NO
Reply #63 - Sep 4^th, 2017 at 12:38pm

Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 12:31pm:

____ wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 12:06pm:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 11:00am:

It's a vote about what is right or wrong.

It's a vote to say to weirdos, 'we do not support your decisions or weird lifestyle.'

We do not accept you.

In our world, 'anything' does not go.

What decisions and weird lifestyle of mine offends you?

don't know, what decisions and weird lifestyle do you have ?

None.
Yet you are the one claiming I have.
So in your mind, what are they?

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 139875
Gender: male

Re: Normal People should vote NO
Reply #64 - Sep 4^th, 2017 at 12:42pm

Captain Caveman wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 12:35pm:

I really couldn't give a rats who does what.
They were already rooting each other before they wed so SSM won't start a massive influx of new disease because the sex side is already happeing and the diseases are going to happen regardless.

SS relationships aren't normal, period.
You want to do it then fine but it's not normal. Stop looking for it to be accepted as "normal". For reproduction to happen ...

This is about marriage, not reproduction.

Back to top

IP Logged

Bam

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 21905
Gender: male

Re: Normal People should vote NO
Reply #65 - Sep 4^th, 2017 at 12:46pm

philperth2010 wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2017 at 8:58pm:

If you value equality and the right to choose vote yes!!!

If you want everyone to be treated equal under the law vote yes!!!

If you want a future where freedom is placed before prejudice vote yes!!!

Roll Eyes

The only stable state is the one in which all men are equal before the law.
Aristotle (384 BC - 322 BC)

This is the reason why I am responding "yes" to the survey - to reduce legal inequality.

Back to top

You are not entitled to your opinion. You are only entitled to hold opinions that you can defend through sound, reasoned argument.

IP Logged

Aussie Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 38866 Gender:	Re: Normal People should vote NO Reply #66 - Sep 4^th, 2017 at 12:47pm Funny how you often read that those who oppose SSM are being bullied and or abused by a minority. The Thread title says it all, does it not?
Back to top	IP Logged

BigOl64

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 14438
Townsville QLD
Gender: male

Re: Normal People should vote NO
Reply #67 - Sep 4^th, 2017 at 12:50pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 12:42pm:

Captain Caveman wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 12:35pm:

I really couldn't give a rats who does what.
They were already rooting each other before they wed so SSM won't start a massive influx of new disease because the sex side is already happeing and the diseases are going to happen regardless.

SS relationships aren't normal, period.
You want to do it then fine but it's not normal. Stop looking for it to be accepted as "normal". For reproduction to happen ...

This is about marriage, not reproduction.

So marriage between anything and anything or will the homos decide who and what can't join in?

The freak list is pretty big, best let the freaks decide what can or can't get married, all in one go. Don't want to bother with these people anymore after this bullsh1t.

Back to top

IP Logged

BigOl64

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 14438
Townsville QLD
Gender: male

Re: Normal People should vote NO
Reply #68 - Sep 4^th, 2017 at 12:51pm

____ wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 12:38pm:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 12:31pm:

____ wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 12:06pm:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 11:00am:

It's a vote about what is right or wrong.

It's a vote to say to weirdos, 'we do not support your decisions or weird lifestyle.'

We do not accept you.

In our world, 'anything' does not go.

What decisions and weird lifestyle of mine offends you?

don't know, what decisions and weird lifestyle do you have ?

None.
Yet you are the one claiming I have.
So in your mind, what are they?

Well if you list all of your sexual proclivities, Ill have a go at pointing out the ones that most people would consider pretty fkken wrong.

Back to top

IP Logged

Captain Caveman

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 6211
Gender: male

Re: Normal People should vote NO
Reply #69 - Sep 4^th, 2017 at 1:03pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 12:42pm:

Captain Caveman wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 12:35pm:

I really couldn't give a rats who does what.
They were already rooting each other before they wed so SSM won't start a massive influx of new disease because the sex side is already happeing and the diseases are going to happen regardless.

SS relationships aren't normal, period.
You want to do it then fine but it's not normal. Stop looking for it to be accepted as "normal". For reproduction to happen ...

This is about marriage, not reproduction.

Yep and marriage has always been between male and female and most of the time involved children at some stage.
Why cant they call it something else instead? Marraige is what us straights have, find another word/meaning.

Back to top

IP Logged

____

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male

Re: Normal People should vote NO
Reply #70 - Sep 4^th, 2017 at 1:04pm

BigOl64 wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 12:51pm:

____ wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 12:38pm:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 12:31pm:

____ wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 12:06pm:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 11:00am:

It's a vote about what is right or wrong.

It's a vote to say to weirdos, 'we do not support your decisions or weird lifestyle.'

We do not accept you.

In our world, 'anything' does not go.

What decisions and weird lifestyle of mine offends you?

don't know, what decisions and weird lifestyle do you have ?

None.
Yet you are the one claiming I have.
So in your mind, what are they?

Well if you list all of your sexual proclivities, Ill have a go at pointing out the ones that most people would consider pretty fkken wrong.

Abstinent

Now over to you to point them out.

Back to top

IP Logged

Unforgiven

Gold Member

Offline

I have sinned

Posts: 8879
Gender: male

Re: Normal People should vote NO
Reply #71 - Sep 4^th, 2017 at 1:08pm

Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2017 at 8:14pm:

If you value men being men and women being women, vote NO.

If you want boys to be boys and girls to be girls, vote NO.

If you want a future where you are allowed to think for yourself, vote NO.

The qualification 'normal' disqualifies Sprintcyclist and his ratbag right wing extremist ilk.

Back to top

“I’ll let you be in my dreams if I can be in yours” Bob Dylan

IP Logged

BigOl64

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 14438
Townsville QLD
Gender: male

Re: Normal People should vote NO
Reply #72 - Sep 4^th, 2017 at 1:23pm

____ wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 1:04pm:

BigOl64 wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 12:51pm:

____ wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 12:38pm:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 12:31pm:

____ wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 12:06pm:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 11:00am:

It's a vote about what is right or wrong.

It's a vote to say to weirdos, 'we do not support your decisions or weird lifestyle.'

We do not accept you.

In our world, 'anything' does not go.

What decisions and weird lifestyle of mine offends you?

don't know, what decisions and weird lifestyle do you have ?

None.
Yet you are the one claiming I have.
So in your mind, what are they?

Well if you list all of your sexual proclivities, Ill have a go at pointing out the ones that most people would consider pretty fkken wrong.

Abstinent

Now over to you to point them out.

Did he know that?

He may think deliberately not getting laid is a bit weird. Personally I think it is a lot weird, it's something catholic priests do and they a seriously fkked up.

Back to top

IP Logged

tickleandrose

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 4110
Gender: female

Re: Normal People should vote NO
Reply #73 - Sep 4^th, 2017 at 1:28pm

Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2017 at 8:14pm:

If you value men being men and women being women, vote NO.

If you want boys to be boys and girls to be girls, vote NO.

If you want a future where you are allowed to think for yourself, vote NO.

Do not listen to the above.

A man is not less of a man if he loves a man.
A woman is not less of a woman if she loves a woman.

If you want a future where you are allowed to think for yourself, and not be caged in by some outdated 'tradition' - that was also made by humans, then you should vote a resounding YES.

Back to top

IP Logged

bwood1946

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 1598
Gender: male

Re: Normal People should vote NO
Reply #74 - Sep 4^th, 2017 at 1:41pm

tickleandrose wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 1:28pm:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2017 at 8:14pm:

If you value men being men and women being women, vote NO.

If you want boys to be boys and girls to be girls, vote NO.

If you want a future where you are allowed to think for yourself, vote NO.

Do not listen to the above.

A man is not less of a man if he loves a man.
A woman is not less of a woman if she loves a woman.

If you want a future where you are allowed to think for yourself, and not be caged in by some outdated 'tradition' - that was also made by humans, then you should vote a resounding YES.

Print Email Facebook Twitter More
Same-sex marriage survey: Petition to deregister Pansy Lai, doctor in No campaign ad, taken down
By Lily Mayers
Updated 51 minutes ago

Media player: "Space" to play, "M" to mute, "left" and "right" to seek.

VIDEO: A No television advert ahead of the same-sex marriage survey (ABC News)
RELATED STORY: Tighter same-sex marriage survey restrictions on hold as first No ad airsRELATED STORY: Why the No campaign's first TV ad will work
MAP: Sydney 2000
A CommunityRun petition calling for a doctor featured in a same-sex marriage No Campaign ad to be deregistered has been removed for breaching the site's terms and conditions.

The petition asked for a review of Dr Pansy Lai's medical registration after she appeared in a Coalition for Marriage advertisement calling for a no vote in the upcoming same-sex marriage survey.

GetUp, who created the community petition platform, said it was removed after receiving dozens of complaints.

"Following the review, the petition was found to breach CommunityRun's terms and conditions and was taken down on Monday morning," a GetUp spokesman said.

Petitions listed on CommunityRun can be uploaded by anyone and are not run or endorsed by GetUp.

A GetUp spokesman said while the organisation was opposed to a same-sex marriage survey, it condemned personal attacks against individuals on either side of the campaign.

"GetUp does not support a petition targeting Dr Pansy Lai, which was uploaded over the weekend, nor did GetUp endorse or organise it," he said.

AMA slams 'inappropriate' petition

The petition was addressed to the Australian Medical Association, which has criticised it as being inappropriate and concerning.

"Individuals should be able to express an opinion on a political matter, without being shouted down," AMA President, Dr Michael Gannon said.

"Everyone's entitled to an opinion and to call for someone to have their livelihood taken away, which is effectively what medical deregistration would mean to a doctor, is utterly inappropriate."
Mr Gannon said the Medical Board of Australia, which is the registrational authority for doctors, would dismiss this complaint very quickly.

"Doctors, like other members of the community, are entitled to an opinion and that should be heard," Dr Gannon said.

Dr Lai and the Coalition for Marriage have been contacted for comment.

DONT HAVE AN OPINION DIFFERENT TO THE YES VOTER FFFS Angry

Back to top

TPI VETERAN

IP Logged