sir prince duke alevine
|
Karnal wrote on Sep 4 th, 2017 at 10:30pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 4 th, 2017 at 10:14pm: Karnal wrote on Sep 4 th, 2017 at 9:59pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 4 th, 2017 at 9:49pm: Let's see how many people end up getting blown up in suicide attacks, or run over by trucks, as a result of this. https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2017/sep/04/we-are-an-example-to-... Quote:Currently, a Muslim woman is not allowed to marry a a non-Muslim. Men are allowed to marry women of any faith who don’t have to convert. Under Islamic law, men typically receive double the inheritance of any woman. Ah Islam, you're so very, very liberal and progressive. Karnal - let me guess...Cleopatra? Quite a few, Alevine, quite a few. But please tell me this: when you you think the Catholic Church will allow Catholics to marry non-Catholics? Malcolm Turnbull is one person who had to convert to marry Lucy. When will Jewish Orthodox rabbis marry non-Jews? Ivanka Trump had to convert to marry Jared Kushner. Cleopatra was forced to marry her brother when she was a child. That didn't stop her learning how to give superb blowjobs and trapping Roman generals in her web of seduction. interesting how Jared wouldn't have to convert if Ivanka was muslim. awww, how feminist of Islam! Anyway, sure, many religions are backwards. Once again, dearest Karnal, I never deny this. But you once again seem to equate when unfortunately the state of the world shows how irrational this is. Tell me Mr. Karnal, if Israel was to introduce such laws, how many jews would protest against it? If Israel had these laws, and then tried to remove them, how much opposition would there be? Tunisia, in general, is a 'more' progressive Islamic state, and something tells me the level of conservative muslims, and islamists, will simply result in bloodshed anyway. Tell me, why does Israel, a country most of you regressives claim is a religious state, not have such laws? Perhaps it has something to do with the number of crazy conservatives/islamists that subscribe to the so called illegitimate interpretation (as said by gandalf)? Israel is secular, Alevine. The Zionists were secularists. The state of Israel - and its creation - has nothing to do with religion. It's solely about nationalism. 19th century European Zionists went to great lengths to establish this. you should tell your fellow regressives this, Karnal. They seem to think otherwise. anyway, you didn't answer the questions I raised of you. COme now, don't be shy Karnal. Would you too expect attacks and bloodshed amongst the jews if a Jewish state decided to change a law to allow women to marry anyone? What would be the public opinion amongst the Jews for this law change? What about Christians? What do you think, Karnal? Do you think any christian/jewish state governments would have the same difficulty as Tunisia is about to have, all because of what is, quite frankly, a very simple and logical change to a very stupid law?
|