freediver wrote on Apr 19^th, 2024 at 12:48pm:


But it doesn't mention that the dark-blue regions are the poorest in self-supporting domestic population growth.
Sure, they're richer - but when it comes to having children, they're the poor nations. Filled with divorced relationships, broken families and people who can only afford 'little white fluffy dogs' as kids - as they struggle to live up to the 'lifestyle' associated with that financial wealth.

freediver wrote on Apr 22^nd, 2024 at 11:49am:

I have nothing against a Woman's choice.
But it seems that the 'Rich' nations prefer women not to breed at all, raise kids, etc - rather have them 'liberated' into working and 'careering' for the Economy instead.
Seems the Dark Blue nations have just gone to the other extreme where 'families' are no longer an issue, its all about National Wealth and 'upper' lifestyles.

The Blue Nations don't exhibit the 'middle-ground' of both having children and attaining wealth in moderation.

The Blue Nations are the richest, but are also the most 'sterile' in breeding.
Little wonder there is a flood of immigration from the outside into them at the moment.

...are thosenations of wealth, really just Gay nations in disguise?

freediver wrote on Apr 22^nd, 2024 at 12:02pm:

Yes - they're happy to chuck in having children to chase careers. Nothing wrong with that at all.
I mean - there's a huge increase in women needing 'sperm donors' as their biological clock ticks some sort of 'regret' in their mentality. One Sydney bus-driver has had to service at least 42 women (and his wife is proud of him) who suddenly decided their careers 'only' was not sufficient enough to make them feel 'full-filled'.

It is what it is. The Dark-Blue nations have chosen a 'child-free Zone' of existence as children cost too much in keeping up with that 'wealthy' culture that comes with it.
This is how they stay rich and dark-blue.

There is the extremism of financially poor but population rich nations.
And of financially rich but population poor nations (who need masses of immigration like what you see in USA and Australia - because their domestic population is 'gay' culturally).

Women have choice. They populate well in some parts of the world, they career well in other parts of the world.
Some women choose to have children and make some money as well without compromising themselves to any 'extreme'.

freediver wrote on Apr 22^nd, 2024 at 11:20am:



did you read that in a book somewhere?   Much of the work we do is work for the sake of working. People create forms to justify their jobs, and other fill them out to keep theirs. Hardly working hard.

People work to achieve a goal. A  goal can be financial or it can be for other reasons.

John Smith wrote on Apr 22^nd, 2024 at 10:33am:



This is as concentratedly stupid as can be expected from you, thicko. Put this on your business card.

You are a capitalist - motivated by self interest - but capitalism doesn't work because of self interest. Still you stick with it because socialism doesn't work either because of self interest. The great divided parrot is looking for a research assistant, you fit the bill.

Frank wrote on Apr 22^nd, 2024 at 7:32pm:


Just because it's beyond you. As are most things.

Quote:


The best societies take the best aspects from both systems and get a fail and balance result.

Extreme capitalism is just as bad as extreme socialism.

John Smith wrote on Apr 22^nd, 2024 at 8:49pm:


Nothing to do with painting houses really. I can't think of anyone who would turn up to their job, or work as hard as they do, if they weren't getting paid. Not sure why I have to explain this.