Australian Politics Forum - Muhammad as the anti-christ

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 43054

Re: Muhammad as the anti-christ
Reply #45 - Feb 28^th, 2018 at 8:04pm

freediver wrote on Feb 28^th, 2018 at 7:53pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 28^th, 2018 at 2:26pm:

Auggie wrote on Feb 28^th, 2018 at 12:14pm:

How so? First of all, Moses didn't rape a nine-year old girl, did he?

Neither did Mohammed, Augie. He married her first. She was apparently accepting of his advances. His marriage was no different to the numerous other dynastic ones which occurred in Arabia and Europe and Asia at the time. Tsk, tsk, always remember what L.P.Hartley said. Roll Eyes

So it's not rape if other people did it?

It isn't "rape" if the female consents, FD. Tsk, tsk, it is amazing how you don't understand what L.P.Hartley said when he stated, "the past is a different country, they do things differently there." The past was where different mores held. I don't hear you condemning the numerous European Christian dynastic marriages which occurred. I don't hear you condemning the numerous Indian dynastic (arranged) marriages which occur. I don't hear you condemning the numerous Chinese dynastic marriages which occur. Why? Why only attack one which occurred 1400 years ago, FD? Does it make you feel better? Of course it does, 'cause you're an Islamophobe. right? Tsk, tsk. Roll Eyes

Oh, and stop misquoting me. Roll Eyes

Back to top

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 49062
Gender: male

Re: Muhammad as the anti-christ
Reply #46 - Feb 28^th, 2018 at 8:08pm

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 28^th, 2018 at 7:57pm:

Secret Wars wrote on Feb 28^th, 2018 at 7:19pm:

I can understand why Brian refuses to engage in any comparison between Big Mo and Jebus as religious representatives. Makes his job as an apologist so much easier.

He is really getting value for money from his framed doctorate of divinity from the internets.

He deserves it with that sort of rigorous examination. Grin

http://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/12/128170/2467911-yawn_20smiley.jpg

Oh, dearie, dearie, me. The politics of jealousy are on display, yet again. Tsk, tsk. Roll Eyes

What are people jealous of, Bwian? Your vanity or your deceitfulness? Or the vain stupidity that made you fork out $50 for an online 'certificate'?

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

freediver

Gold Member

Offline

www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49732
At my desk.

Re: Muhammad as the anti-christ
Reply #47 - Feb 28^th, 2018 at 8:10pm

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 28^th, 2018 at 8:04pm:

freediver wrote on Feb 28^th, 2018 at 7:53pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 28^th, 2018 at 2:26pm:

Auggie wrote on Feb 28^th, 2018 at 12:14pm:

How so? First of all, Moses didn't rape a nine-year old girl, did he?

Neither did Mohammed, Augie. He married her first. She was apparently accepting of his advances. His marriage was no different to the numerous other dynastic ones which occurred in Arabia and Europe and Asia at the time. Tsk, tsk, always remember what L.P.Hartley said. Roll Eyes

So it's not rape if other people did it?

It isn't "rape" if the female consents, FD. Tsk, tsk, it is amazing how you don't understand what L.P.Hartley said when he stated, "the past is a different country, they do things differently there." The past was where different mores held. I don't hear you condemning the numerous European Christian dynastic marriages which occurred. I don't hear you condemning the numerous Indian dynastic (arranged) marriages which occur. I don't hear you condemning the numerous Chinese dynastic marriages which occur. Why? Why only attack one which occurred 1400 years ago, FD? Does it make you feel better? Of course it does, 'cause you're an Islamophobe. right? Tsk, tsk. Roll Eyes

Oh, and stop misquoting me. Roll Eyes

Of course they do things differently there. Like raping 9 year old girls and calling it an eternal moral example for all mankind to follow. Slaughtering Jews. Destroying civilisation. Creating a religious empire on the back of sex slavery and violence.

That doesn't make it not rape.

Back to top

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 49062
Gender: male

Re: Muhammad as the anti-christ
Reply #48 - Feb 28^th, 2018 at 8:12pm

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 28^th, 2018 at 8:04pm:

freediver wrote on Feb 28^th, 2018 at 7:53pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 28^th, 2018 at 2:26pm:

Auggie wrote on Feb 28^th, 2018 at 12:14pm:

How so? First of all, Moses didn't rape a nine-year old girl, did he?

Neither did Mohammed, Augie. He married her first. She was apparently accepting of his advances. His marriage was no different to the numerous other dynastic ones which occurred in Arabia and Europe and Asia at the time. Tsk, tsk, always remember what L.P.Hartley said. Roll Eyes

So it's not rape if other people did it?

It isn't "rape" if the female consents, FD. Tsk, tsk, it is amazing how you don't understand what L.P.Hartley said when he stated, "the past is a different country, they do things differently there." The past was where different mores held.

And yet - Muslims regard them as eternal if Mohammed did it in the 7th century. Shurely shome mishtake, Bwian.

So are they eternal or are they different, Bwian, them Mohammedan mores? You can't just keep jumping this way and that like a demented idiot without being caught out - once again - as being just that. Tut tut, Bwian, tut tut. And Hmmmm. Tsk tsk Roll Eyes

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 43054

Re: Muhammad as the anti-christ
Reply #49 - Feb 28^th, 2018 at 8:13pm

freediver wrote on Feb 28^th, 2018 at 8:10pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 28^th, 2018 at 8:04pm:

freediver wrote on Feb 28^th, 2018 at 7:53pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 28^th, 2018 at 2:26pm:

Auggie wrote on Feb 28^th, 2018 at 12:14pm:

How so? First of all, Moses didn't rape a nine-year old girl, did he?

Neither did Mohammed, Augie. He married her first. She was apparently accepting of his advances. His marriage was no different to the numerous other dynastic ones which occurred in Arabia and Europe and Asia at the time. Tsk, tsk, always remember what L.P.Hartley said. Roll Eyes

So it's not rape if other people did it?

It isn't "rape" if the female consents, FD. Tsk, tsk, it is amazing how you don't understand what L.P.Hartley said when he stated, "the past is a different country, they do things differently there." The past was where different mores held. I don't hear you condemning the numerous European Christian dynastic marriages which occurred. I don't hear you condemning the numerous Indian dynastic (arranged) marriages which occur. I don't hear you condemning the numerous Chinese dynastic marriages which occur. Why? Why only attack one which occurred 1400 years ago, FD? Does it make you feel better? Of course it does, 'cause you're an Islamophobe. right? Tsk, tsk. Roll Eyes

Oh, and stop misquoting me. Roll Eyes

Of course they do things differently there. Like raping 9 year old girls and calling it an eternal moral example for all mankind to follow. Slaughtering Jews. Destroying civilisation. Creating a religious empire on the back of sex slavery and violence.

That doesn't make it not rape.

Produce evidence it was "rape", FD. I look forward to reading it. Roll Eyes

Back to top

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 43054

Re: Muhammad as the anti-christ
Reply #50 - Feb 28^th, 2018 at 8:15pm

Frank wrote on Feb 28^th, 2018 at 8:12pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 28^th, 2018 at 8:04pm:

freediver wrote on Feb 28^th, 2018 at 7:53pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 28^th, 2018 at 2:26pm:

Auggie wrote on Feb 28^th, 2018 at 12:14pm:

How so? First of all, Moses didn't rape a nine-year old girl, did he?

Neither did Mohammed, Augie. He married her first. She was apparently accepting of his advances. His marriage was no different to the numerous other dynastic ones which occurred in Arabia and Europe and Asia at the time. Tsk, tsk, always remember what L.P.Hartley said. Roll Eyes

So it's not rape if other people did it?

It isn't "rape" if the female consents, FD. Tsk, tsk, it is amazing how you don't understand what L.P.Hartley said when he stated, "the past is a different country, they do things differently there." The past was where different mores held.

And yet - Muslims regard them as eternal if Mohammed did it in the 7th century. Shurely shome mishtake, Bwian.

So are they eternal or are they different, Bwian? You can't just keep jumping this way and that like a demented idiot before you are caught out - once again - s being just that. Tut tut, Bwian, tut tut. And Hmmmm. Tsk tsk Roll Eyes

It is FD who regards them as different. You should direct your questions to him, Soren. Tsk, tsk. Roll Eyes

Back to top

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

freediver

Gold Member

Offline

www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49732
At my desk.

Re: Muhammad as the anti-christ
Reply #51 - Feb 28^th, 2018 at 8:16pm

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 28^th, 2018 at 8:13pm:

freediver wrote on Feb 28^th, 2018 at 8:10pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 28^th, 2018 at 8:04pm:

freediver wrote on Feb 28^th, 2018 at 7:53pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 28^th, 2018 at 2:26pm:

Auggie wrote on Feb 28^th, 2018 at 12:14pm:

How so? First of all, Moses didn't rape a nine-year old girl, did he?

Neither did Mohammed, Augie. He married her first. She was apparently accepting of his advances. His marriage was no different to the numerous other dynastic ones which occurred in Arabia and Europe and Asia at the time. Tsk, tsk, always remember what L.P.Hartley said. Roll Eyes

So it's not rape if other people did it?

It isn't "rape" if the female consents, FD. Tsk, tsk, it is amazing how you don't understand what L.P.Hartley said when he stated, "the past is a different country, they do things differently there." The past was where different mores held. I don't hear you condemning the numerous European Christian dynastic marriages which occurred. I don't hear you condemning the numerous Indian dynastic (arranged) marriages which occur. I don't hear you condemning the numerous Chinese dynastic marriages which occur. Why? Why only attack one which occurred 1400 years ago, FD? Does it make you feel better? Of course it does, 'cause you're an Islamophobe. right? Tsk, tsk. Roll Eyes

Oh, and stop misquoting me. Roll Eyes

Of course they do things differently there. Like raping 9 year old girls and calling it an eternal moral example for all mankind to follow. Slaughtering Jews. Destroying civilisation. Creating a religious empire on the back of sex slavery and violence.

That doesn't make it not rape.

Produce evidence it was "rape", FD. I look forward to reading it. Roll Eyes

He had sex with a 9 year old girl Brian.

He even later document his beating of this girl for leaving the house without his permission as part of his 'eternal moral example for all mankind to follow'.

Gandalf insists he beat her because he loved her.

Back to top

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.

IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 43054

Re: Muhammad as the anti-christ
Reply #52 - Feb 28^th, 2018 at 8:20pm

freediver wrote on Feb 28^th, 2018 at 8:16pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 28^th, 2018 at 8:13pm:

freediver wrote on Feb 28^th, 2018 at 8:10pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 28^th, 2018 at 8:04pm:

freediver wrote on Feb 28^th, 2018 at 7:53pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 28^th, 2018 at 2:26pm:

Auggie wrote on Feb 28^th, 2018 at 12:14pm:

How so? First of all, Moses didn't rape a nine-year old girl, did he?

Neither did Mohammed, Augie. He married her first. She was apparently accepting of his advances. His marriage was no different to the numerous other dynastic ones which occurred in Arabia and Europe and Asia at the time. Tsk, tsk, always remember what L.P.Hartley said. Roll Eyes

So it's not rape if other people did it?

It isn't "rape" if the female consents, FD. Tsk, tsk, it is amazing how you don't understand what L.P.Hartley said when he stated, "the past is a different country, they do things differently there." The past was where different mores held. I don't hear you condemning the numerous European Christian dynastic marriages which occurred. I don't hear you condemning the numerous Indian dynastic (arranged) marriages which occur. I don't hear you condemning the numerous Chinese dynastic marriages which occur. Why? Why only attack one which occurred 1400 years ago, FD? Does it make you feel better? Of course it does, 'cause you're an Islamophobe. right? Tsk, tsk. Roll Eyes

Oh, and stop misquoting me. Roll Eyes

Of course they do things differently there. Like raping 9 year old girls and calling it an eternal moral example for all mankind to follow. Slaughtering Jews. Destroying civilisation. Creating a religious empire on the back of sex slavery and violence.

That doesn't make it not rape.

Produce evidence it was "rape", FD. I look forward to reading it. Roll Eyes

He had sex with a 9 year old girl Brian.

He even later document his beating of this girl for leaving the house without his permission as part of his 'eternal moral example for all mankind to follow'.

Gandalf insists he beat her because he loved her.

Did she refuse his advances, FD? Do you have evidence that this was a case of rape? YES/NO

If you don't, then piss off. All you're doing is applying 21st century morality to the era of 700 CE.

As I have pointed out, you ignore the Christian dynastic marriages where the spouse was of a young age. You ignore the Hindu dynastic marriages, the Chinese dynastic marriages. Why? Are they too embarrassing for you to admit to? I wonder why? Tsk, tsk. Roll Eyes

Back to top

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 49062
Gender: male

Re: Muhammad as the anti-christ
Reply #53 - Feb 28^th, 2018 at 8:26pm

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 28^th, 2018 at 8:20pm:

Did she refuse his advances, FD? Do you have evidence that this was a case of rape? YES/NO

If you don't, then piss off. All you're doing is applying 21st century morality to the era of 700 CE.

As I have pointed out, you ignore the Christian dynastic marriages where the spouse was of a young age. You ignore the Hindu dynastic marriages, the Chinese dynastic marriages. Why? Are they too embarrassing for you to admit to? I wonder why? Tsk, tsk. Roll Eyes

What a disgusting, disgraceful piece of gweggy you are, Bwian.
Karnal will be along in a minute, miam-miaming you. Hideous.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Bobby. Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 108311 Melbourne Gender:	Re: Muhammad as the anti-christ Reply #54 - Feb 28^th, 2018 at 8:36pm Find an interesting chart here: Jesus and Muhammad, Islam and Christianity: A Side-by-Side Comparison. https://www.thereligionofpeace.com/pages/articles/jesus-muhammad.aspx
Back to top	IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 97261

Re: Muhammad as the anti-christ
Reply #55 - Feb 28^th, 2018 at 9:04pm

Frank wrote on Feb 28^th, 2018 at 8:26pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 28^th, 2018 at 8:20pm:

Did she refuse his advances, FD? Do you have evidence that this was a case of rape? YES/NO

If you don't, then piss off. All you're doing is applying 21st century morality to the era of 700 CE.

As I have pointed out, you ignore the Christian dynastic marriages where the spouse was of a young age. You ignore the Hindu dynastic marriages, the Chinese dynastic marriages. Why? Are they too embarrassing for you to admit to? I wonder why? Tsk, tsk. Roll Eyes

What a disgusting, disgraceful piece of gweggy you are, Bwian.
Karnal will be along in a minute, miam-miaming you. Hideous.

Now that's offended.

Brian - miam miam.

Back to top

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 97261

Re: Muhammad as the anti-christ
Reply #56 - Feb 28^th, 2018 at 9:07pm

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 28^th, 2018 at 7:42pm:

Karnal wrote on Feb 28^th, 2018 at 7:40pm:

polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 28^th, 2018 at 2:26pm:

I'm not sure why you are hell-bent on the idea that sacrificing yourself per se is necessarily a spiritual act. Surely a spiritual act must have some meaning vis-a-vis bringing you closer to God. Now you might say handing himself in and sacrificing himself would be 'spiritual' because it would save lives - but I would say it would likely result in the killing of his entire community - not to mention the death of his message and religion. Particularly given the fact that the revelation was not complete, and continued right up until the rest of Muhammad's life. A muslim would doubtless say that its not very 'spiritual' to cut short the revelation of the Quran mid-way through, and finish off the muslim community before it ever really began. While I'm a bit scratchy on Christian history - I'm pretty sure Jesus wasn't crucified mid-way through his message.

I also don't buy the rather simplistic notion that anything done of a temporal nature - such as preserving a state and community - is some antithesis to spirituality. True, its not exactly a 'spiritual' thing to do - but doing it doesn't necessarily make you a "non-spiritual" person. Its pretty silly to insist that the only people who can be spiritual must be completely removed from the day to day monotony of the temporal world.

Another good answer. Religions offer different things. Yeheshua modelled self-sacrifice. The Buddha taught mindfulness. Moh showed how to unite and fight for your beliefs.

Take one, take all. Just as a doctor prescribes different medicine for different diseases, we should find the right spiritual treatment for our ailments.

Each prophet has a different cure. But first, diagnose your symptoms and say Ah.

Why not just accept that we all carc it and turn to dust? That opens up a whole new world.

That's one way. Stay curious, Homo.

Either that, or be offended. We all have this choice, no?

Back to top

IP Logged

Yadda

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 22013
A cat with a view

Re: Muhammad as the anti-christ
Reply #57 - Feb 28^th, 2018 at 10:03pm

Bobby. wrote on Feb 28^th, 2018 at 8:36pm:

Find an interesting chart here:

Jesus and Muhammad,
Islam and Christianity:
A Side-by-Side Comparison.

https://www.thereligionofpeace.com/pages/articles/jesus-muhammad.aspx

Good find bobby.

SNIPPET....

Differences Between the Islamic and Christian-Based Worlds

Muslim Legacy Countries that Muslims want to escape from.

Christian Legacy Countries that Muslims want to escape to.

So true.

Back to top

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31

IP Logged

Bobby.

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 108311
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: Muhammad as the anti-christ
Reply #58 - Feb 28^th, 2018 at 10:09pm

Yadda wrote on Feb 28^th, 2018 at 10:03pm:

Bobby. wrote on Feb 28^th, 2018 at 8:36pm:

Find an interesting chart here:

Jesus and Muhammad,
Islam and Christianity:
A Side-by-Side Comparison.

https://www.thereligionofpeace.com/pages/articles/jesus-muhammad.aspx

Good find bobby.

SNIPPET....

Differences Between the Islamic and Christian-Based Worlds

Muslim Legacy Countries that Muslims want to escape from.

Christian Legacy Countries that Muslims want to escape to.

So true.

Thanks - I hope everyone reads that - it's great.
It shows that the muslims are satanic.

Back to top

IP Logged

moses

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 6353

Re: Muhammad as the anti-christ
Reply #59 - Feb 28^th, 2018 at 10:37pm

the board liar wrote:

Quote:

Reply #45 - Today at 8:04pm
it is amazing how you don't understand what L.P.Hartley said when he stated, "the past is a different country, they do things differently there." The past was where different mores held

Reply #52 - Today at 8:20pm
All you're doing is applying 21st century morality to the era of 700 CE.

Well that's nice, as the imam said when he played with himself after he sat down to pee.

Here we have a poster who lies and 99.99% of the time refers to ancient deeds to excuse 21st century muslim terrorists.

A lying self righteous hypocrite.

Back to top

IP Logged