[urlhttps://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/family-of-murdered-teen-leigh-bradley-furious-over-laws-protecting-her-killer/news-story/925112256bba158728c3ab7af2bbd08f][/url]

LESS than a third of offenders on the NSW Child Protection Register who breach their reporting conditions are sent to jail, with the family of one murdered teenage girl blasting the system’s protections for vile offenders.

Statistics revealed by The Daily Telegraph show the number of child predators convicted of breaching conditions of the register has more than doubled in five years — from 170 in 2013 to 361 in 2017.

The most popular punishment imposed by courts was “bond without supervision”, given to 107 offenders.

Just 95 were sent to jail, for an average of 5.7 months, according to the figures from the Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research.

Adding insult to the misery of victims, strict laws protect the privacy of offenders on the register, prohibiting the media from identifying them, even after they have reoffended.

Authorities will not even confirm how many offenders are on the register. However, The Daily Telegraph understands there are almost 4000 across the state.

The protection and lenient sentences have infuriated the family of Leigh Bradley, who was just 17 years old when she was brutally murdered in 1991.

Her killer has been on the register since his release from jail in 2008. But he twice breached the register’s reporting conditions when he made contact with a 15-year-old girl and opened a social media profile without informing authorities.

Erin Bradley, who was 12 when Leigh was murdered, was furious her sister’s killer copped a slap on the wrist for breaching his conditions. Meanwhile, she was being denied the most basic information about his case.

“It’s disgusting that as victims of crime we don’t have anyone looking out for our safety in the community, but his identity is protected by law,” Ms Bradley said.

“If he moved to my suburb we would not be told.”

Leigh Bradley’s murderer refused to talk to The Daily Telegraph when questioned recently in Wagga Wagga, where he has lived since 2014.

In May 2017, a magistrate handed him a 12-month good behaviour bond after police learned he had breached two of the register’s strict conditions by giving cigarettes to the 15-year-old and having a Facebook page without telling police.

The register is used to protect the community from people who commit violent or sexual offences against a child.

Offenders must keep police up to date on minute details of their life including travel plans, tattoos, workplace, car, mobile phone, internet devices, internet connection, email and social media.

hild.Police must also be told when an offender “befriends a child” and has any verbal, physical or written contact with a c

SPECIAL INVESTIGATION



and they seriously expect these perverts  who walk free.....to obey theri commands....  yeah right!

my heart goes out to the families that spend the rest of their lives living with this.

maybe a ROYAL....the way it is   its everyman for himself...its the same with dvos... meaningless because there is no action when they break the rules...

how many get let off a parking ticket?????>..

yet these mongrels flaunt the rules..and get nothing..

mozzaok wrote on Jun 11^th, 2018 at 11:23am:


Do you think it's time to attribute culpability to enablers in the legal system who facilitate re offenders going back out an hurting people?

One that springs to mind is Brett Peter Cowan.

He raped a boy in a toilet block in Brisbane, was given a slap on the wrist. Then he raped and nearly killed a young boy in NT, another slap on the wrist. He then killed a young lad.

At the very minimum, all the enablers should be chucked out of the legal profession but if I had my way, they'd all get 20 years.

Vigilantism and lots of it is the only way to force the perverts who've assumed control to listen to those who pay them AND who pay for their deliberate perversion of the joke we call 'law'

True story:

Little girl, aged 8, was raped and murdered by a fifty-something, overweight, bestial piece of excreta

The girl's mother attended the trial each day.  The mother was forced to listen to police and medical testimony, plus see photos of her destroyed child

The killer rapist paedophile was found guilty

On the day of sentencing, the mother duly sat in court

The killer received a lenient sentence

The mother shot him dead before attendants could usher him safely out of sight

The mother was immediately taken into custody

She received something in the region of 30 years, from memory

During her trial, she told the court that had her child's killer received a life sentence, she would not have shot him.  Having seen the photos of her child's ravaged body, having seen what the killer did to her child, she had believed a life sentence -- although not recompensing for the loss of and suffering of her child -- would have been appropriate

However, the sentence handed down by the judge was, in the belief of the mother, an insult to her child and did not represent justice

That woman, that mother, remains behind bars in Germany as far as I'm aware.  Women's movements worldwide were, last I heard, still trying to gain justice for the mother in the form of immediate release.  That went on for decades and may be continuing, not that it will do anything to undo the dreadful injustice served upon that poor mother


No doubt these days, that woman would be prevented from taking a gun into court.  The 'law' protects itself AND many of the lumps of excreta who come before the 'law'


I salute that women and wish she'd had time to also shoot the judge

PZ547 wrote on Jun 11^th, 2018 at 3:11pm:


I don't agree with Vigilantism but when legal outcomes are so far removed from community expectations, a little Vigilantism, just like a little revolution is a good thing.

A couple of judges and lawyers ending up dead would also be a good thing.

Unforgiven wrote on Jun 11^th, 2018 at 5:00pm:


Oh, I thought you'd be half way to Kabul by now.
Your sex slave is waiting for you.

Judges should be elected.

Based on their verdicts, none of the judges would get past the first round in Australia.

Who are they protecting?

Many judges have themselves been caught out in the past.
Perhaps this is how they protect their own.

I have said it before, I'll say it again.
Any filthy pedo touches my kids Or grandkids

He will suffer for as long as I can keep him alive
Is it possible to completely de- glove a than body?

F' me, I suppose I deserved that, but I was not expecting it.
I do not condone, champion, or promote vigilantism,
I abhor the idea that people would attack legal professionals because they did not like certain decisions, or outcomes.

What we may be able to reconcile actions we would be willing to live with, it is vastly different to declare that those standards be adhered to by all.

If I were the woman in court, in question, I would be happy to do what I did, then accept the consequences for that.
If you can't do the time, don't do the crime.