Frank wrote on Aug 12^th, 2018 at 9:07pm:

There are plenty of sciences but not one scientific fact you can dispute, on the other hand religion does not have one single fact to go on.

Frank wrote on Aug 13^th, 2018 at 7:08pm:

Name one in the favour of religion.

Amadd wrote on Aug 15^th, 2018 at 1:39am:



People love ceremonies.

Frank wrote on Aug 12^th, 2018 at 8:01pm:


It is easy to prove that religion is a man made construct.
Therefore the null hypothosis is that there is no God.
The onus of proof lies with the religious.
There is no point in even entertaining the idea of the existence of God until there is proof.

Frank wrote on Aug 16^th, 2018 at 7:24pm:


Oh, shyte! I've seen the light! Jebus is the son of god, I mean he is god, I mean...

You mean think less, just believe.

You're correct IMO. I'd like to make a succinct reply but I think that it will be a little drawn out and it will require some more thought.

OK edit.

I'm assuming that religious people would assume that athiests, agnostics or deists have never experienced anything that could/would be regarded as paranormal. That's not correct, however, the difference being that the above stated would most probably look to some logical reason for their experience and not blindly attribute it to some ancient book of bs.

It's often stated that "non-believers" consider themselves as God. On the contrary, if there is in fact some interventional supernatural force, then those who rely on logic and reason are God's greatest servants to the gift given to them.

I would stick my neck out to say that, upon reliable proof in the existence of an interventional god, 100% of atheists would embrace God.

But that ain't gonna happen is it? We need to hope and pray that 3 + 3 = 7.
Sorry assholes, I'll stick with the truth and you fodder can go to the hell that you invented. ..and what we don't believe in, so therefore it does not exist for us...only for you.

Science exists for all of us, so therefore, we will always rule you ignorant assholes, unless you learn to compete realistically and in the good name of a non-interventionist God 

The difference between science and religion is that you can challenge science.

Scientists are doing it all the time. Every time a hypothesis is submitted and peer reviewed they tear it to shreds trying to find any flaw. But if the evidence is there it becomes accepted

Scientists continually question the current accepted scientific facts, trying to improve our understanding of the Universe.

You cannot challenge religion in this way. It is the word of god! Despite all the evidence to the contrary the earth is 6000 years old. Despite the evidence for evolution we came from a dust man and a rib woman. Even though they lack the physical ability donkeys can talk. Unicorns are real but dinosaurs aren’t.

You challenge these concepts and it’s an attack on faith, you’re persecuting them for their beliefs.

A scientist says “I don’t know the answer let’s see if we can find out.”

A religious person says “I don’t know the answer, so it must be god.”