Jasin wrote on Aug 31
st, 2018 at 7:26pm:
You are all missing the point really.
State sanctioned execution might work in some nations, sometimes it doesn't.
But here in Australia - it would not work at all.
In fact, it would make this country worse.
Understand that Australia is different, although many here try to live it much like other parts of the world.
Like the joke: How do you kill an Aussie?
You leave them alone and they'll do it themselves.
So with that said, we would not have to execute.
We are a nation of SUICIDE (we gotta go overseas for war and for other nations for starters).
Isolate them - socially, environmentally and more ...and they'll kill themselves (like the cowards they are).
Even now, with Australia being the highest ratio of drug addicts (self destruction) in the world, per population. We are well on the way anyway.
Isolation was what failed the Aborigines and it would still do the same to anyone, today. Look around and you'll see what happens to people, when they have no-one left. It's the loneliness that's the killer.
Name and Shame and let isolationism do the rest.
You consistently write a good post -- underrated posts for the most part
however, if we're to take you literally, it would require at least one human per crim, to ensure their isolation. So it wouldn't be isolation at all. Not to mention all the do-gooders who'd drive kombi vans out to the Isolation Flats to give succour to the supposedly isolated crims. Already becoming too complicated
so, cheaper, swifter and more satisfying to simply kill them. As to means of their elimination, I'm happy with something humane, although others would go for a painful death to be administered
just as long as they're gone, preferably before they've been able to breed more of themselves