Australian Politics Forum - Chelsea Manning

Gordon Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 20488 Gordon Gender:	Re: Chelsea Manning Reply #15 - Aug 30^th, 2018 at 6:53pm Poor turdo, always wrong And remember that as president, Barack Obama simply commuted Ms Manning's sentence; the punishment remains on her record
Back to top	IBI IP Logged

Frank Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 44574 Gender:	Re: Chelsea Manning Reply #16 - Aug 30^th, 2018 at 6:54pm Aussie wrote on Aug 30^th, 2018 at 10:24am: why can't this person come in? You mean this WOMAN, shurely. Are you transphobic? I think so. Shame.
Back to top	Estragon: I can’t go on like this. Vladimir: That’s what you think. IP Logged

Secret Wars

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3928
Gender: male

Re: Chelsea Manning
Reply #17 - Aug 30^th, 2018 at 6:55pm

I would ban her, she's a piece of poo.

If, she had of selectively released a single or even a few bits of information that would demonstrate an intent to whistle blow and in the public interest I would defend that, governments deserve to be pulled up on occasion.

But she just did a dump that revealed source, methods and personnel, she set back the interests of the US and caused discord between it and its allies.

The Russians and Chinese would still have dedicated programs gleaning through it.

Many other countries instead of going on an international talking tour she would be dissapeared into an anonymous hole with a bullet in the back of the head.

Back to top

IP Logged

Gordon Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 20488 Gordon Gender:	Re: Chelsea Manning Reply #18 - Aug 30^th, 2018 at 6:56pm Ms Manning is not, and never has been, a whistleblower. She is someone convicted of espionage who was given a long prison sentence.
Back to top	IBI IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 38523
Gender: male

Re: Chelsea Manning
Reply #19 - Aug 30^th, 2018 at 6:57pm

Frank wrote on Aug 30^th, 2018 at 6:54pm:

Aussie wrote on Aug 30^th, 2018 at 10:24am:

why can't this person come in?

You mean this WOMAN, shurely. Are you transphobic? I think so. Shame.

This person is a transgender Sore End. Born male, likely still has the tackle, but identifies as female.

Do you give a stuff? I sure could not care less.

Did you fly here, Sore End, as Karnal asserts?

Back to top

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 38523
Gender: male

Re: Chelsea Manning
Reply #20 - Aug 30^th, 2018 at 7:00pm

Secret Wars wrote on Aug 30^th, 2018 at 6:55pm:

I would ban her, she's a piece of poo.

If, she had of selectively released a single or even a few bits of information that would demonstrate an intent to whistle blow and in the public interest I would defend that, governments deserve to be pulled up on occasion.

But she just did a dump that revealed source, methods and personnel, she set back the interests of the US and caused discord between it and its allies.

The Russians and Chinese would still have dedicated programs gleaning through it.

Many other countries instead of going on an international talking tour she would be dissapeared into an anonymous hole with a bullet in the back of the head.

Ancient history. "Exonerated" by the USA President, no less. Explain to me what threat s/he poses to Australia....NOW?

Back to top

IP Logged

Secret Wars

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3928
Gender: male

Re: Chelsea Manning
Reply #21 - Aug 30^th, 2018 at 7:03pm

Aussie wrote on Aug 30^th, 2018 at 7:00pm:

Secret Wars wrote on Aug 30^th, 2018 at 6:55pm:

I would ban her, she's a piece of poo.

If, she had of selectively released a single or even a few bits of information that would demonstrate an intent to whistle blow and in the public interest I would defend that, governments deserve to be pulled up on occasion.

But she just did a dump that revealed source, methods and personnel, she set back the interests of the US and caused discord between it and its allies.

The Russians and Chinese would still have dedicated programs gleaning through it.

Many other countries instead of going on an international talking tour she would be dissapeared into an anonymous hole with a bullet in the back of the head.

Ancient history. "Exonerated" by the USA President, no less. Explain to me what threat s/he poses to Australia....NOW?

Exonerated, seems to be some disagreement about that, you should scuttle way and demonstrate that first.

Back to top

IP Logged

Gnads

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 29281
Gender: male

Re: Chelsea Manning
Reply #22 - Aug 30^th, 2018 at 7:07pm

Aussie wrote on Aug 30^th, 2018 at 6:52pm:

Quote:

Southern doesn't have a criminal record like Manning & she's not a liar.

Oh yes indeedy she is. No doubt about it. I have the proof. Do you want to see it? Do you think that I am bluffing?

Farq off Noddy she does not have a criminal record.

btw who the hell cares about whether you are "bluffing" or not?

Really? Roll Eyes

Back to top

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais

IP Logged

Aussie Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 38523 Gender:	Re: Chelsea Manning Reply #23 - Aug 30^th, 2018 at 7:08pm Not exonerated. I said "exonerated." What possible threat does she currently pose to Australia? Do you say she ought to be kept out, while we read today that Mutton lets in his mate's French au pairs, in total contradiction of the advice of his own Department?
Back to top	IP Logged

Gnads

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 29281
Gender: male

Re: Chelsea Manning
Reply #24 - Aug 30^th, 2018 at 7:09pm

Aussie wrote on Aug 30^th, 2018 at 7:00pm:

Secret Wars wrote on Aug 30^th, 2018 at 6:55pm:

I would ban her, she's a piece of poo.

If, she had of selectively released a single or even a few bits of information that would demonstrate an intent to whistle blow and in the public interest I would defend that, governments deserve to be pulled up on occasion.

But she just did a dump that revealed source, methods and personnel, she set back the interests of the US and caused discord between it and its allies.

The Russians and Chinese would still have dedicated programs gleaning through it.

Many other countries instead of going on an international talking tour she would be dissapeared into an anonymous hole with a bullet in the back of the head.

Ancient history. "Exonerated" by the USA President, no less. Explain to me what threat s/he poses to Australia....NOW?

Not exonerated ... released ... the criminal conviction remains.

Back to top

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 38523
Gender: male

Re: Chelsea Manning
Reply #25 - Aug 30^th, 2018 at 7:10pm

Gnads wrote on Aug 30^th, 2018 at 7:07pm:

Aussie wrote on Aug 30^th, 2018 at 6:52pm:

Quote:

Southern doesn't have a criminal record like Manning & she's not a liar.

Oh yes indeedy she is. No doubt about it. I have the proof. Do you want to see it? Do you think that I am bluffing?

Farq off Noddy she does not have a criminal record.

btw who the hell cares about whether you are "bluffing" or not?

Really? Roll Eyes

Nah, Gonads, I shall not far cough. You said she is not a liar. She is, and I have the proof. Want to see it, or am I bluffing?

Back to top

IP Logged

Secret Wars Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 3928 Gender:	Re: Chelsea Manning Reply #26 - Aug 30^th, 2018 at 7:12pm Aussie wrote on Aug 30^th, 2018 at 7:08pm: Not exonerated. I said "exonerated." Let's not dance over the exonerated bit Aussie, was she, yes or no?
Back to top	IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 38523
Gender: male

Re: Chelsea Manning
Reply #27 - Aug 30^th, 2018 at 7:17pm

Secret Wars wrote on Aug 30^th, 2018 at 7:12pm:

Aussie wrote on Aug 30^th, 2018 at 7:08pm:

Not exonerated. I said "exonerated."

Let's not dance over the exonerated bit Aussie, was she, yes or no?

S/he was 'exonerated' in the sense that the President of the USA commuted the sentence.

Yes or no. Did he or did he not commute the sentence?

Back to top

IP Logged

Secret Wars

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3928
Gender: male

Re: Chelsea Manning
Reply #28 - Aug 30^th, 2018 at 7:21pm

Aussie wrote on Aug 30^th, 2018 at 7:17pm:

Secret Wars wrote on Aug 30^th, 2018 at 7:12pm:

Aussie wrote on Aug 30^th, 2018 at 7:08pm:

Not exonerated. I said "exonerated."

Let's not dance over the exonerated bit Aussie, was she, yes or no?

S/he was 'exonerated' in the sense that the President of the USA commuted the sentence.

Yes or no. Did he or did he not commute the sentence?

Find a dictionary bozo, your opening shot was wrong, you don't get to skip past that whilst demanding answers from others. Address the post that I questioned.

Back to top

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 38523
Gender: male

Re: Chelsea Manning
Reply #29 - Aug 30^th, 2018 at 7:26pm

Secret Wars wrote on Aug 30^th, 2018 at 7:21pm:

Aussie wrote on Aug 30^th, 2018 at 7:17pm:

Secret Wars wrote on Aug 30^th, 2018 at 7:12pm:

Aussie wrote on Aug 30^th, 2018 at 7:08pm:

Not exonerated. I said "exonerated."

Let's not dance over the exonerated bit Aussie, was she, yes or no?

S/he was 'exonerated' in the sense that the President of the USA commuted the sentence.

Yes or no. Did he or did he not commute the sentence?

Find a dictionary bozo, your opening shot was wrong, you don't get to skip past that whilst demanding answers from others. Address the post that I questioned.

I found a dictionary and nowhere can I find "exonerated." Perhaps you can link me to one?

Back to top

IP Logged