Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 14 15 16 17 18 ... 42
Send Topic Print
Movies, recently seen (Read 57211 times)
Captain Nemo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 9846
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Movies, recently seen
Reply #225 - Jan 11th, 2022 at 12:10pm
 
UnSubRocky wrote on Dec 12th, 2021 at 6:58pm:
Ghostbusters Afterlife

(addendum)

Having paid $9 to watch the movie in the cinema, I was just as impressed with the movie as I was when watching the movie online in poor camera quality definition. This time, I got to see the movie with the help of high definition visuals and surround sound that we get to witness in Rockhampton's Birch Carroll and Coyle Cinemas.

If you want your children to see a good movie this summer in theatres, go see Ghostbusters Afterlife. This movie is true to its original two movies in terms of tone, style, visuals, and even the ending. The only exception would be the updated references to modern culture. I did think that I would find this movie a bit of a drag in the comedy department. But, I did not find either Ghostbusters or Ghostbusters 2 to be side-splittingly funny. We did find that the seriousness of the movie mixed up with comedy quite well. The lines were delivered deadpan. Unfortunately, some of the jokes that I found surreptitiously funny did not register a laugh with a 90% full theatre audience. But, the rest of the humour was appreciated.

"For Harold" was the ending scene's tagline. Having died in 2014, Harold Ramis could not rejoin the cast as his Egon character. However, Reitman and his production team put together a good tribute to Ramis in the form of recreating Ramis' facial appearance on a body double. Although, you do not see Ramis' face in the opening scenes of the movie, it is implied that it is him. A fitting end to a good franchise. This movie redeems what "Ghostbusters (2016)" did to ruin the series.


Wasn't expecting much from this but it was way better than anticipated.  Grin

Mckenna Grace who plays Phoebe was excellent. She has a great future in acting I reckon.  Cool
Back to top
 

The 2025 election could be a shocker.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 44322
Gender: male
Re: Movies, recently seen
Reply #226 - Jan 15th, 2022 at 10:41pm
 
The French Dispatch by Wes Anderson.

Amusing, inventive, imaginative.

Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
UnSubRocky
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Crocodile Hunter: Origins

Posts: 24537
Rockhampton
Gender: male
Re: Movies, recently seen
Reply #227 - Jan 19th, 2022 at 5:16pm
 


Scream (2022)

A fourth sequel to the Scream franchise, Scream (5) feels like another loyal sequel to the original. But this fifth installment seems to be more in line with the original movie than any of the three first sequels. In this movie, Tara is home alone and texting her friend Amber. It is later learned that she is being stalked by Ghostface who then attacks her. This sets in motion the events of her sister and her friends getting involved in being stalked and attack throughout the movie in the most casual of circumstances. Main character Samantha plays the protector role of her sister (half-sister), Tara.

Legacy character of Dewey, Gale and Sydney from the original movie coming out of movie victim retirement to act as vigilantes for this movie. However, in this sequel, they take their roles a lot more seriously, even if they poke fun at the original movie's plot. I would have to say that this movie is more dramatic than scary. Although the blood and gore are quite graphic. And you might say that this movie plays the kills somewhat more realistic than ever.

The ending is a little bit of a letdown. They had to use the house featured in the first movie as the final scenes for the reveal. And whilst I can be happy with how the killers were revealed, it seemed as if the characters were going through the motions with who was the killer and who was the victim. As if the audience needed another insulting explanation and repeat of the first movie.

Good movie for the fans of the franchise. Meh for everyone else.

Rating: B-.
Back to top
 

At this stage...
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 40784
Re: Movies, recently seen
Reply #228 - Jan 28th, 2022 at 6:15pm
 
A Hong Kong movie, "Vampire Cleanup Department".  A sort of horror-comedy-romance about how a young man joins the VCD.  Rather reminiscent of Mr.Vampire, a very successful horror comedy franchise of the 1980s.  Well worth watching!
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 40784
Re: Movies, recently seen
Reply #229 - Jan 31st, 2022 at 12:52pm
 
Just watched "Red Joan"  with Judy Dench.  She plays a retired Soviet Spy who betrayed Tube Alloys to the Russians.  Based on a real story, the real person was not prosecuted because of her age.   A bit muddled in her thinking and her reasoning it was basically a love story between a younger (a much younger) her and a Soviet agent and his sister.   Followed her involvement to Canada and return until her boss who she also becomes involved with gets arrested for "Soviet sympathies" (and the revelation of a Soviet test) all while she was doing the spying!  Good period piece.  Her son, who is also her lawyer is upset with her, finally joins her on her doorstep in front of the press where she confesses.   Well worth watching.
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 40784
Re: Movies, recently seen
Reply #230 - Feb 1st, 2022 at 7:46pm
 
Just watched "Swimming with Men" starring Rupert Graves, Charlotte Riley, Jim Carter, Rob Brydon, Nathaniel Parker, Daniel Mays, Thomas Turgoose, Jane Horrocks, Adeel Akhtar, Christian Rubeck.  Its about a middle-aged man who leaves his wife because he is afraid of aging. He joins up with a group of male synchronised swimmers at the local pool who help him to overcome his fears.   They go to unofficial male synchronised swimming championship in Milan where they come second on their first official swimming meet. A funny movie, well worth watching. Smiley
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 44322
Gender: male
Re: Movies, recently seen
Reply #231 - Feb 1st, 2022 at 8:37pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on Feb 1st, 2022 at 7:46pm:
Just watched "Swimming with Men" starring Rupert Graves, Charlotte Riley, Jim Carter, Rob Brydon, Nathaniel Parker, Daniel Mays, Thomas Turgoose, Jane Horrocks, Adeel Akhtar, Christian Rubeck.  Its about a middle-aged man who leaves his wife because he is afraid of aging. He joins up with a group of male synchronised swimmers at the local pool who help him to overcome his fears.   They go to unofficial male synchronised swimming championship in Milan where they come second on their first official swimming meet. A funny movie, well worth watching. Smiley

That's so you, Derek, just soooo you.

Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 40784
Re: Movies, recently seen
Reply #232 - Feb 1st, 2022 at 9:59pm
 
Frank wrote on Feb 1st, 2022 at 8:37pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Feb 1st, 2022 at 7:46pm:
Just watched "Swimming with Men" starring Rupert Graves, Charlotte Riley, Jim Carter, Rob Brydon, Nathaniel Parker, Daniel Mays, Thomas Turgoose, Jane Horrocks, Adeel Akhtar, Christian Rubeck.  Its about a middle-aged man who leaves his wife because he is afraid of aging. He joins up with a group of male synchronised swimmers at the local pool who help him to overcome his fears.   They go to unofficial male synchronised swimming championship in Milan where they come second on their first official swimming meet. A funny movie, well worth watching. Smiley

That's so you, Derek, just soooo you.


*SIGH*  No sense of humour, Soren?  No wonder you don't fit in, in Australia.  Tsk, tsk, tsk...  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 47305
Gender: male
Re: Movies, recently seen
Reply #233 - Feb 3rd, 2022 at 8:07pm
 
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 40784
Re: Movies, recently seen
Reply #234 - Feb 3rd, 2022 at 9:22pm
 
The Legend of Wu Kong - Monkey before he met Tripitaka, a modern take on the tale and why he challenges heaven.  A Hong Kong movie with a dash of arrogance and humour, the tale is spectacularly told.  Well worth watching.   Smiley
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
UnSubRocky
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Crocodile Hunter: Origins

Posts: 24537
Rockhampton
Gender: male
Re: Movies, recently seen
Reply #235 - Feb 3rd, 2022 at 10:30pm
 


Moonfall

Spoilers ahead. Patrick Wilson, Halle Berry, and John Bradley star in this Roland Emmerich movie. That said about the stars and the director, you can imagine what sort of movie you are about to see. Stargate, Godzilla, The Day After Tomorrow, 2012, and Independence Day: Resurgence movies mix up their genres and put forward a movie about a crashing to Earth moon in a disaster film that would probably put you to sleep before you feel any impending doom.

The opening scenes show astronauts doing a routine mission to repair a satellite. Their casual mission takes a turn for the serious when some Matrix-type multiple entities working reminiscently like a swarm of bees manages to attack the shuttle and the satellite. This leaves the mission commander Jocinda (Halle Berry) unconscious, and Brian (Patrick Wilson) the only one to save the space shuttle. Unfortunately, the consequent NASA inquiry into what went on about the incident becomes a ridiculous cover-up. NASA officials prefer the guesswork of Jocinda's account of what went on. And the supposition of an explanation about possible solar flares and meteorites are claimed to be fact. Brian's lucid recollection of the incident is rejected. So too is Brian's continued employment with NASA.

18 months after the incident, we get this seemingly nobody employee at NASA, working as a janitor, break into executive's office to try and gather information about a situation involving the moon. John Bradley plays the role of KC. For whatever it was that his role in the movie was to be, John plays the character as a lunatic conspiracy theorist with some kind of fixation with NASA. Somehow, he comes across information about the moon's orbit and leaks the information to the press.

As it eventuates, this leads to chaos with world's people going about their "end of the world" type anarchy with looting and destruction of property, as if they had seen some police officer knelt down on some drug addict's neck. But, NASA is up and running with a shuttle launch in no time to try and stop whatever is going on with the moon. Blah, blah, blah -- everything goes to schitt. It is then up to the three main leads and a skeleton crew at NASA to do their own launch and put together another strategy to kill whatever it is that is coming from the moon. KC acts like a schoolboy on a trip to the candy store. Jocinda treats the mission about as casually as you can for someone played by an over-the-hill actress who is winding down her career. And Brian plays some kind of Messiah character trying to redeem his family with a hero act.

Overall, this movie is visually impressive. That is all that saves the movie from being a complete waste of time. We might treat this movie as a science-fantasy movie instead of an end of the world type movie. I found it difficult to say that the moon has a strong enough gravitational pull to lift people off the ground. This is probably Patrick Wilson's worse movie. I will not be able to watch another movie with him without referencing this movie. So, I do hope that he recovers. And John Bradley has probably hit a relatively low point in his career. Hopefully, his Hollywood career gets better from here on.

Rating: C+ (but only because the impressive visuals helped bump up the rating. Otherwise, it is a C- movie)
Back to top
 

At this stage...
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 40784
Re: Movies, recently seen
Reply #236 - Feb 7th, 2022 at 4:05pm
 
Waking Ned Devine.  A marvellous Irish tale of what happens when an old man unexpectedly wins the state lottery in an obscure Irish village.  Two old fellows work out who the mystery recipient is only to discover him dead from the shock.  Rather than seeing all the money go to waste, they gather all the villagers together and concoct a plan to fool the lotteries.  Everybody agrees except for one old woman who decides to go against them and travels on her electric scooter out of town to the only working telephone.  There, she is about to phone the lotteries when the lotteries own agent comes around the corner and narrowly misses the phonebox and then narrowly misses another van who swerves to miss him and nearly hits the phonebox and who in turn forces it over a cliff's edge.  The village celebrates coming into money, each villager getting over 300 thousand pounds.  The final scene is them saluting Ned from a cliff top as the sun goes down...   A well acted movie with some familiar Irish faces film on the Island of Man.   Worth watching. Cool
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Captain Nemo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 9846
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Movies, recently seen
Reply #237 - Feb 7th, 2022 at 9:28pm
 
Nightmare Alley



Slow build-up but some big names giving some good performances.

Bradley Cooper as Stanton Carlisle is great as usual.

Back to top
 

The 2025 election could be a shocker.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
UnSubRocky
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Crocodile Hunter: Origins

Posts: 24537
Rockhampton
Gender: male
Re: Movies, recently seen
Reply #238 - Feb 13th, 2022 at 6:27pm
 


Star Trek: Into Darkness

2013's Star Trek: Into Darkness is the sequel to JJ Abrahm's Star Trek. The rebooted franchise that has done nothing more than to blind people with lens flares, in an attempt to cover up the juvenile storylines with rampant stupidity.

The opening 10 minutes of the Into Darkness movie shows the Federation somewhat meddling with a new species of humanoid, violating the prime directive in whatever ways you can think. For some reason, Captain Kirk decides that he needs to steal a scroll out of the temple of the alien's temple and run off with it whilst the natives are in hot pursuit. The escape is interrupted by a large monster that Kirk has to kill -- and Dr McCoy (standing behind the monster) informing Kirk that the monster was their getaway ride. WTF??? And if that is not enough, Sulu, Uhura, and the ever reliable Spock are trying to shuttlecraft and cable drop down into an erupting volcano to deploy a cold fusion reactor. Spock volunteers to be lowered into the volcano (nearly falling into the lava) to activate the device. I do not know about anyone else, but did they not use teleportation devices in the last movie. They could have either set the device to deploy, and then teleported the device to activate upon countdown inside the volcano. Or perhaps have Spock teleport to the volcano, deploy the device and then get out of there. Added to that was the apparent need to take the USS Enterprise out of the ocean (where it was to be hidden) just to teleport someone only kilometres away back on board the space ship.

With that mindless head-numbing scene out of the way, we cut to London. A family is going to see their dying daughter in hospital. The father is accosted by a man who claims that he can save his dying daughter. The father is given a vial of the man's own blood and something else that looks like a ring. The father later injects the blood into his daughter's IV -- with near immediate beneficial effect. The repayment the man receives is to have the father walk into his workplace to (unknowingly) conduct a bombing of some Starfleet archive.

This terrorist act means that all the starship captains are called to a meeting where they discuss what happens. Kirk, having been demoted to first officer, becomes aware that the terrorist bombing was a way of getting the starship captains to meet together in one room. The terrorist, having known this, sets to shoot up the room and kill all the officers. Kirk's commanding officer, Admiral Pike, gets killed in the attack. Kirk disables the terrorist's (John Harrison's) attack ship -- but Harrison gets away. We later learn the Harrison has transported to the Klingon homeworld of Kronos.

This schlock of a movie only gets better. Kirk gets his command reinstated. He also leads the Enterprise crew on a voyage to kill Harrison on Kronos and then flee from the system without being caught. As part of the arsenal, 72 stealth missiles are aboard the ship, to lock on to Harrison's position and annihilate him. Apparently, one of the missiles is not enough to do the job. Kirk gets a team together and orders his security team to dress in civilian clothes, so not to arouse suspicion that they are part of the Federation. Sulu, acting as captain, then broadcasts a message towards Kronos to tell Harrison to surrender or face annihilation. (If you were not face palming watching this scene play out, you really are dumb as schitt). But apparently, the message was more useful than not, as Harrison surrenders when learning more about the message from Kirk -- having just rescued Uhura and the away team from certain death.

The remainder of the movie goes to hell in a handbasket. Admiral Marcus -- the chief architect of the plan to kill Harrison -- shows up in a dreadnought version of the Enterprise. Marcus finds out that Kirk has taken Harrison prisoner instead of killing him. Marcus also learns that Kirk has found out that Harrison is actually a 300 years old super human named Khan. For whatever bloody reason, Kirk decides that running from the USS Vengeance back to Earth, so that Khan can face justice is much smarter than handing over the prisoner to Marcus for execution.

We could go on and on about this shhhtuff and how a captain of a spaceship does not know how to deal with admirality. But, basically, Kirk decided that morality of a situation trumps reality. The USS Vengeance kicks the USS Enterprise's arse to a point that only Admiral Marcus's daughter, Carol, can intervene and try and talk the admiral out of destroying Enterprise. With Marcus deciding to destroy Enterprise anyway, he does not simply recommence firing. But, he gets out the large cannons of Vengeance's weaponry to *slowly* turn towards Enterprise. Suddenly, the weapon is disabled. Scotty, who had been aboard Vengeance since it was launched, has taken out the control that work the weaponry. Somehow, it did not occur to him to disable the warp drive or other weapons systems before Admiral Marcus had an attempt against Kirk's ship.

Kirk has to take control of Marcus' dreadnought. But, he has to team up with Khan in an attempt to overpower the crew. I wonder how this will turn out. Oh, by the way, Spock decides that the time was right to prevaricate in order to trick Khan into thinking that Khan has the upper hand. That could have been useful a few days back.

Rating B-/C+ because of the special effects.
Back to top
 

At this stage...
WWW  
IP Logged
 
UnSubRocky
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Crocodile Hunter: Origins

Posts: 24537
Rockhampton
Gender: male
Re: Movies, recently seen
Reply #239 - Feb 17th, 2022 at 5:39am
 


Dracula

Starring Christopher Lee as Dracula, Peter Cushing as Dr Van Helsing and Carol Marsh as Lucy. This 1958 film adaptation of the Bram Stoker novel of "Dracula" casts a grim account of Dr Van Helsing's attempt to thwart the menace of Count Dracula.

Jonathan Harker leads off the story of his travels to Transylvania to help with the documentation of Count Dracula's library. Upon arrival, Harker is told to eat well and rest up comfortably. It is still daylight upon Harker's arrival. Upon finishing his meal, Harker is disturbed by a woman claiming to be held captive by Dracula. She fails to mention why she claims to be held captive. The woman is then disturbed by the arrival of Count Dracula. Harker and Dracula get acquainted and begin their business arrangement. It is later revealed that Harker is there to attempt to end the life of Dracula.

Harker's escape is compounded by the need to kill both the woman and Dracula. It is revealed that the woman is also a vampire who attempts to kill Harker. Although Harker is saved by Dracula (more likely rescued to be saved as Dracula's meal), Harker falls into unconsciousness and does not recover until the afternoon. As sunset approaches, Harker tries to slay both the vampire woman and Dracula. Though, the setting of the sun only prevents Harker's plans to unfold the way he wishes.

We are shown Van Helsing's introduction at the inn -- allegedly where Harker stayed for a brief time. Van Helsing is concerned by the innkeepers's insistence on using garlic flowers. But, the innkeeper is not interested in divulging why. Van Helsing later discovers what has happened to his friend Johnathan Harker.

Van Helsing informs the Holmwood family about Harker's demise. Mr Holmwood rejects what has happened, given that his sister, Lucy, has taken priority with her declining health. We find that Lucy has taken ill due to her attachment to the newly arrived Count Dracula. Dr Seward does not know how to cure Lucy. And Dr Van Helsing's advice to keep the windows and doors locked and to put garlic flowers around the room are not liked by Lucy. Lucy is found dead in her bed the next day.

Having buried Lucy, it is revealed by the maid's daughter, Tania, that an undead Lucy had tempted to abduct Tania. Being warded off by Van Helsing's cross, Lucy is finally killed off with a stake through the heart by Van Helsing. We learn that Dracula is menacing Mina Holmwood. Mina's husband, Arthur, and Van Helsing pursue Dracula to put an end to the terror.

---

A very good movie. Stylized as a 1950s movie. We do not expect too much in terms of being any more than a stage film. This is a high brow movie. If you want special effects, it is best that you go about watching a later remake of the movie.

Rating: B+/A-
Back to top
 

At this stage...
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 14 15 16 17 18 ... 42
Send Topic Print