Gordon wrote on Nov 7
th, 2018 at 8:05am:
aquascoot wrote on Nov 7
th, 2018 at 6:21am:
wilsons playing a dangerous game by using her weight as some sort of "virtue signal".
food is one of our most primitive primitive motivations.
its more primal then sexual behaviour and aggressive behaviour.
so if you cant regulate your food intake, then good luck with the behaviours that are more in the abstract then that.
its just easy to live in the durr state and never go down deep into your own personal psychology and confront "the shadow".
as jung said, most people see the route to enlightenment as "following your bliss, in some sort of new age wish fulfilment".
but the route to enlightment is to go deep into the parts of your character that are truly hellish.
to confront glutony and lust and the will for predatory power.
thats why most people will ,never do it.
they just find it eassier to say "i'm proud of being fat", they find it easier to hit the porn to satisfy their lust then to find a qaulity partner, they find it easier to wave an angry placard at a corporation then to harness that aggressive drive and go build a business.
people always take the easy low road instead of the "narrow road to success".
thats why its a narrow road.
90 % of people who lose weight put it all back on.
most people are failures.
but that doesnt mean we should celebrate failure.
we need to be always pushing people to climb that damm road.
people like rebel tell people its ok not to climb the road.
they tell people its ok to stop.
i think thats a very very bad idea
The human body has perfected the mechanism to avoid starvation. When dieting, the body assumes there is a famine and sets it's self for the bext round of feat so it can store as fat every calorie consumed.
That's why it's so hard for people to keep weight off, and that causes yo-yo dieting.
That aside, there is now a push on to remove obesity from being a medical issue and to make it a social construct. I think you should take thise course, Aqua
http://www.academia.edu/10355447/Syllabus_Fat_Studies_and_Feminism undoubtedly gordon, undoubtedly.
women are a standard deviation higher in compassion then men.
this is what stops them throwing the baby out the window at 3 am when its been crying all night.
so its deeply biological.
and its CORRECT for a helpless infant.
but women then come to be confused and see all "crying infants" as in need of compassion.
and thats NOT CORRECT.
so a crying fattie doesnt need to be loved on like a crying infant, and neither does a crying individual from any group that we could ask to take responsibility for themselves.
because when you dont expose an individual (say a fattie) to the harsh reality of the game, you dont make them safer, you just make them weaker.
its why the patriachal societies (like ours) are strong and successful and the societies founded on the principles of sharing and socialism and compassion (venezuela) are a catastrophe.
remember only very small infants, those severely injured or unwell and the frail elderly should recieve compassion.
to everyone else it is a catastrophic response
Forum
Pages: 1 
