Frank wrote on Jan 26^th, 2019 at 7:11pm:


But, as with all religious people, they engage in double-think - the act of simultaneously accepting two mutually contradictory beliefs.

Karnal wrote on Jan 27^th, 2019 at 12:24am:


You would be correct, if it was not for the fact that in English usage, "a race apart," is an expression of general application, not one of anthropology.

Frank wrote on Jan 26^th, 2019 at 11:21am:


The Bible sanctifies the butchering of women and children as noble acts of faith. Oh yes it does. For centuries such butchering was sanctioned by the church as noble acts of faith. And yet, you would be the first to argue that Christianity has got over that and 'reformed'.

There is nothing in Islamic doctrine that should act as an impenetrable 'never ever' road block to muslims behaving both civily and keeping in faith with their religion. Even if you insist there are specific doctrinal passages that make slaughtering innocents a compulsory act of faith (ridiculous, but I'll humour you), there's no reason why it can't be bypassed, ignored or rationalised into something more compatible with civil society. The truth is most muslims do it anyway, and on the other side of the coin, the jihadis bypass ignore or rationalise specific commands to not be intolerant butchering thugs. If Christians can get past specific doctrinal commands to punish and/or revile homosexuals and look upon women as subservient, inferior beings who must not be heard in public - into a religion that officially embraces gay rights and women's equality - then I don't think its a stretch for muslims to get over some pretty vague and ambiguous doctrinal references that allegedly condone slaughtering innocents on the basis of personal beliefs as an act of faith. For one thing, they can instead emphasise the decidedly *NON* vague and *NON ambiguous commands to accept and embrace freedom of thought in 2:256 and 18:29.

The recent Islamic atrocities in the Philippines, after a referendum passed in Mohammedan favour, seems to indicate Islam is not reformable. Afghan women have voiced their fears that a peace deal with the Taliban, means a return to slavelike conditions. (NYT)

I say old chap how about we just throw the homosexuals off a tall building, problem solved (the muzzies will like this one)?

As for them sassy women being all uppity, why not just beat them into submission (cause qur'an says that's O.K.)?

Now if gandi was fair dinkum he'd have told us that the Bible is in two parts, *OLD* and *NEW* and  not to put too finer a point on it, but, the *NEW* bit actually said about 2019 years ago that all that bad women killing stuff was defunct.

So them people who done all the bad things in the last 2019 years are actually disobeying what's in the *NEW* (but that just slipped gandis' mind, I'd say).

So It's no big deal for them Christians to move forward with the times, so too speak (cause they just following the *NEW*.

Now I don't want to put a dampener on things but them muzzies going forward with the times, well that's a whole different ball game.

You see the theme of the qur'an is:

1/. the qur'an is perfect and can't be changed.

2/. not only is it perfect but it's totally against islamic doctrine to actually question anything bad in the qur'an.

3/. that there qur'an is opposed to them evil kufirs, why allah and his believers hate their guts if you get my drift.

4/. the qur'an is muslim supremacy ideology.

5/. the muzzies actually believe that when Jesus returns to earth He will convert to islam and kill all those uppity Christians who will never ever convert to islam.

6/. well not only does allah and his believers hate the kufir, it actually says that the muzzie who dies killing the kufir is the highest grade of muslim an he definitely will get into that big brothel in the sky with all them big titted aliens an little boys.

7/.That there qur'an says that allah could kill the kufirs if he wanted to, but wait for it, he just wants the muzzies to kill them as some sort of a test.

8/. allah says it's perfectly O.K. to rape women.

9/. allah says that the true blue muzzies should kill all them ones who are apostates and corrupters.

10/. allah makes it clear that true muzzies have to stay away from anyone who doesn't believe in allah, now wait for the good bit, they have to give their own family the shove if they are also unbelievers.

Now people may well say why is gandi making all these silly statements about ignoring the bad bits etc. etc., well you see gandi knows full well that if people start thinking for themselves and start questioning the innumerable *BAD* bits of the qur'an, they will quickly come too the conclusion that islam is nothing at all about peace and harmony on earth, it's all about muslim supremacy, and it's just a war manual to shore up the muslims and get them to spread islam across the land.

When they become thus *enlightened* the said muzzies will leave islam in droves.

polite_gandalf wrote on Jan 30^th, 2019 at 9:43am:


What's to stop Muslims paying attention to it again?

Would it be fair to describe you as a hypocrite for suggesting Muslims ignore those parts of the Quran they feel uncomfortable with? Or are you only suggesting that non-Muslims ignore them?

Karnal wrote on Jan 30^th, 2019 at 10:34pm:


Mmm, it's actually two questions, old chap.  Of course, FD, doesn't answer questions, he just asks them.  Tsk, tsk.